![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: age, based, predictor, rating, university, yale |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Interesting toy to mess with. Interesting to test it with actual
performances. http://fairmodel.econ.yale.edu/aging/chess.htm |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Nov 7, 12:16 pm, Rob wrote:
Interesting toy to mess with. Interesting to test it with actual performances. http://fairmodel.econ.yale.edu/aging/chess.htm Ridiculous! It predicts that at age 100, I will be back where I started at 1000 on GetClub. Seriously, I think they factored in certain assumptions about players starting out young, reaching their peaks fairly rapidly -- that sort of thing. My decline should be much faster than predicted by this tool, unless rampant ratings inflation returns soon (like right now). -- help bot |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Nov 7, 12:20 pm, help bot wrote:
On Nov 7, 12:16 pm, Rob wrote: Interesting toy to mess with. Interesting to test it with actual performances. http://fairmodel.econ.yale.edu/aging/chess.htm Ridiculous! It predicts that at age 100, I will be back where I started at 1000 on GetClub. Seriously, I think they factored in certain assumptions about players starting out young, reaching their peaks fairly rapidly -- that sort of thing. My decline should be much faster than predicted by this tool, unless rampant ratings inflation returns soon (like right now). -- help bot LOL It predicted Korchnois to within 100 points. He actually scored higher than the predictor... but thats not bad over a 30 to 40 year span. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Nov 8, 11:45 am, Rob wrote:
It predicted Korchnois to within 100 points. He actually scored higher than the predictor... but thats not bad over a 30 to 40 year span. But GM Kortchnoi was an anomaly. A typical, mature chess player here in the USA started around the time of the Fischer boom, peaked not too long afterward, then began a gradual decline and now is considerably weaker than his peak (and is still obsessed with Bobby Fischer and remains in denial... until death). Seriously, the rate of decline was way, way off. (At 130 years old, I will /still/ be better than Sanny?) I think they have assumed that people are going to live much longer in the future, and are ignoring the reality of super-size-me fast food, HDTV, and robots which will soon do all the household chores so you only need to get out of your easy chair once a month, to replace the worn-down batteries in your remote controls. Look, my neighbor's car can park itself, there are robots which mow the lawn automatically and find their own rechargers, etc. Even now, they are working on speech recognition so I will no longer burn calories typing out text... . -- help bot |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Nov 7, 9:16 am, Rob wrote:
Interesting toy to mess with. Interesting to test it with actual performances. http://fairmodel.econ.yale.edu/aging/chess.htm Arnad Elo had a similar statistic (a chart) in his pioneer book. RL |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Ockham rating function | Wlodzimierz Holsztynski (Wlod) | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 8 | June 21st 06 01:43 PM |
| The Ockham rating function | Chess One | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 5 | June 21st 06 01:43 PM |