On Dec 7, 7:22 am, David Richerby
wrote:
Chess One wrote:
In Europe, chess management is a different form of activity than
professional wrestling. This is largely true because requirements
for 'membership' are more relaxed or even do not exist. You can get
a rating with 'joining' anything, for example.

*Without* joining anything. (A typo, I'm sure.)

Are you sure? It might be Andean.

"The Historian" wrote

Perhaps it's the same answer to the question, "Why isn't there a
"Fake Phil Innes?"

Because FSS wanted others to read the posts?

- Tom Martinak

JHC

On Dec 7, 1:04 pm, "Tom Martinak" wrote:
"The Historian" wrote

Perhaps it's the same answer to the question, "Why isn't there a
"Fake Phil Innes?"

Because FSS wanted others to read the posts?

- Tom Martinak

LOL, Tom. LOL!

"The Historian" wrote in message
...
On Dec 7, 1:04 pm, "Tom Martinak" wrote:
"The Historian" wrote

Perhaps it's the same answer to the question, "Why isn't there a
"Fake Phil Innes?"

Because FSS wanted others to read the posts?

- Tom Martinak

LOL, Tom. LOL!

Couple chuckleheads chuck around choice crap and character assassination, as
usual.

Martiniak is like to joke with a known net-stalker, whose profile is mighty
similar to the FSS, since that is Martiniak's measure - he can't write this
at USCF's forum since he is banned there, since he also cannot state a
context for his writing which is not ad hominist, as here - maybe Jerry's
policy at CJA would allow it? It allows so very much! And besides, no-one
will complain since no-one will read it! )

Martiniak has no doubts since, in all his writing, he has avoided them
entirely, preferring the certainties he finds in association with such as
abusenik Neil Brennan.



This is also not in Chess Life, and for good reason.

Phil Innes