In another thread, Sam Sloan wrote:

"The fact is that Taylor Kingston has never beaten a master."

Would you care to bet on that, Sam? If so, how much? I'd like a
minimum bet of at least $10,000, but I'll go higher if you like.

SLAMMIN' SAMMY SLOAN

The Rapper-Tapper man has returned -- not to
confirm his initial statement that Taylor Kingston
did not contribute a shining moment when he
claimed to be 2300+ Elo.

Nope, Rapper-Tapper does this new song and
dance: I originally put the pressure on Kingston re
his playing strength. So what?

The issue was not a comment by me but the kind of
battering that NMnot Kingston was taking from Slammin'
Sammy during the delicious debate over their playing a
grudge match for money. Kingston chickened out on the
grounds that he couldn't stand to be in the same room and
breathe the same air with Sloan. Bill Brock, to his credit,
accepted the challenge and lost to Sam Sloan in Chicago.
..
Slammin' Sammy gets the credit or discredit for
brutally cornering into a weakminded lie.

Rapper-Tapper's rap-a-tappin'-tappin' on behalf
of his forum ally has nothing to do with Kingston's
idiotic lie that he was rated 2300+ Elo at the "peak"
of his career, whereas he was always a solid A player.

My money is on Sloan if Mr. 2300+ Elo ever
dares to face him over-the-board.

Yours, Larry Parr

THE PAULIE-GRAF CHALLENGE

Concerning NMnot Taylor Kingston's challenge to
Sam Sloan for a $10,000 or larger bet: I may as well
renew my challenge to NMnot and, given his recent
contributions to this site, one David Kane.

The bet size would be $10,000 plus another
several thousand to cover my travel and other
expenses Stateside for a polygraph test.

The question asked of me would be whether I ever
posted under bogus names such as wmiketwo, jr or any
other name my adversaries would care to adduce.
We can easily agree on a third party as stakesholder.
I would prefer a disinterested referee with the
respective funds placed in escrow.

Mr. 2300+ Elo would be asked whether he posted
under such monickers as paulie graf and Xylothist.

Heh, heh, heh.

I'm a ready teddie for such a bet. Perhaps the
Messrs. David Kane, Louie Blair and Taylor Kingston
can pool their resources to fund their side of the bet.

Yours, Larry Parr

On Mar 14, 3:35 am, " wrote:

I would prefer a disinterested referee

He won't be hard to find YAAAAWN

* "The fact is that Taylor Kingston has never beaten a master."

* Would you care to bet on that, Sam? If so, how much? I'd like a
minimum bet of at least $10,000, but I'll go higher if you like.

We should not leave it on chances/luck. There should be 3 Matches. And
the person winning 2/3 or Maximum wins will be declared winner.

As in Chess sometimes good players make blunders. So taking 3 games
will give better judgement.

Master Level at GetClub plays somewhat like a Master in Middle game.

Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html

So have 3 games with Master Level and see how many of them can you
win. I suppose you will need 3 days for completing 3 games with Master
Level.

If Taylor Kingston win 2/3 games Sam Sloan will pay $10,000 to Taylor
Kingston and if Taylor kinggston looses more games to Master Level,
Then Taylor Kingston will pay to SamSloan.

If the Players (Sam Sloan/ Taylor Kingston) are poor (Financial
Problem) we can have Match for $1000 or even $100. Depending on their
financial status.

And the Winner send me 10% of your Earning for suggesting such an
idea.

2 things

1. Taylor Kingston will not take help from his Fritz Computer.
2. Will not refer any Books for Opening.

Bye
Sanny

Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html

On Mar 14, 8:24 am, Sanny wrote:
"The fact is that Taylor Kingston has never beaten a master."

Would you care to bet on that, Sam? If so, how much? I'd like a
minimum bet of at least $10,000, but I'll go higher if you like.

We should not leave it on chances/luck. There should be 3 Matches. And
the person winning 2/3 or Maximum wins will be declared winner.

Three matches, all of them first to 10 wins, draws not counting. The
first match to begin March 10, 2010. If the score reaches 8-8 then I
don't know what the fcku's going to happen.

* In another thread, Sam Sloan wrote:

* "The fact is that Taylor Kingston has never beaten a master."

* Would you care to bet on that, Sam? If so, how much? I'd like a
minimum bet of at least $10,000, but I'll go higher if you like.

Well, we've heard from three people, none of them Sam Sloan, and
none of them addressing the point here. Come on, Sam, put up or shut
up.

On Mar 13, 8:35*pm, " wrote:
7 THE PAULIE-GRAF CHALLENGE
7
7 * * * Concerning NMnot Taylor Kingston's challenge to
7 Sam Sloan for a $10,000 or larger bet: *I may as well
7 renew my challenge to NMnot and, given his recent
7 contributions to this site, one David Kane.
7
7 * * * The bet size would be $10,000 plus another
7 several thousand to cover my travel and other
7 expenses Stateside for a polygraph test.
7
7 * * * The question asked of me would be whether I ever
7 posted under bogus names such as wmiketwo, jr or any
7 other name my adversaries would care to adduce.
7 We can easily agree on a third party as stakesholder.
7 I would prefer a disinterested referee with the
7 respective funds placed in escrow.
7
7 * * * Mr. 2300+ Elo would be asked whether he posted
7 under such monickers as paulie graf and Xylothist.
7
7 * * * Heh, heh, heh.
7
7 * * * I'm a ready teddie for such a bet. *Perhaps the
7 Messrs. David Kane, Louie Blair and Taylor Kingston
7 can pool their resources to fund their side of the bet.
7
7 Yours, Larry Parr

_
"I hereby issue a $10,000 lie detector
challenge to gutless Larry Parr!" - Vince
Hart (26 Feb 2006 07:47:25 -0800)
_
"What will be asked?" - Larry Parr
(26 Feb 2006 18:17:37 -0800)
_
"We can start with whether or not I am 'help bot'"
- Vince Hart (27 Feb 2006 04:51:14 -0800)
_
"Let's start with whether I genuinely suspect that
Vinnie Hart is our Help Bot. I certainly do but, of
course, I can't prove it." - Larry Parr (27 Feb 2006
16:50:41 -0800)
_
(Larry Parr subsequently changed his mind about the
identity of helpbot.)

On Mar 14, 5:53*pm, wrote:
** In another thread, Sam Sloan wrote:

** "The fact is that Taylor Kingston has never beaten a master."

** Would you care to bet on that, Sam? If so, how much? I'd like a
*minimum bet of at least $10,000, but I'll go higher if you like.

* Well, we've heard from three people, none of them Sam Sloan, and
none of them addressing the point here. Come on, Sam, put up or shut
up.

Sam has gone into winter Sleep ZZZzzzzz..... May be he wakes up next
year.... ZZZzzzzz......

I present again Sam Sloan's claim:

"The fact is that Taylor Kingston has never beaten a master."

Interested readers can check the original post he http://tinyurl.com/27n2xd

Sam's claim is quite absolute and unequivocal, and also
unequivocally false. I have challenged Sam to put his money where his
mouth is. I have 10,000 actual, official American dollars that say I
have beaten an actual officially-titled USCF master in an actual,
serious, USCF-rated chess game.
I propose this bet not out of egotism; I readily acknowledge that my
chess-playing achievements are nothing great. But it takes only one
contrary instance to refute "never," and I can always use a few
bucks.
Our Sam expressed his opinion with great vehemence and certainty,
yet since I proposed the bet, he has remained silent on the subject.
If he is so sure, what's the problem? He'd make an easy ten grand. As
I see it, the problems could be any or all of the following:

1. Sam is such an economic failure that he can't muster ten bucks in
the same place at the same time, let alone ten thousand.
2. Sam has perhaps been trying to arrange a loan for the bet, acting
on the "greater fool" theory, but has not been able to find anyone
more foolish than himself.
3. Sam is not sane, and cannot distinguish between factual truth and
his own dream-world.
4. Sam is an inveterate liar and smear-monger who will say anything,
but he slinks away in silence when his lies are exposed.