A Chess forum. ChessBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ChessBanter forum » Chess Newsgroups » rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

If 6 Was 9, or, Can Sam Sloan Get Anything Right?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 14th 08, 05:56 PM posted to rec.games.chess.misc,rec.games.chess.politics
ttk5079@gmail.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 789
Default If 6 Was 9, or, Can Sam Sloan Get Anything Right?

In another thread, our inimitable Sam Sloan (I think the real one
this time) wrote:

On Mar 14, 12:18 pm, SBD wrote:

On Mar 14, 10:06 am, wrote:


"Seeming to reply to Evans in his foreword to 'Paul Keres: The Quest
for Perfection' (ICE, 1997), Nunn says 'Attempts to analyze the games
themselves for evidence of Keres' suicidal efforts ... appear to be
misguided' and notes that Vishy Anand, in his 1995 title match with
Kasparov, committed two 'elementary errors far worse than any
committed by Keres in ... 1948 ... and nobody seriously suggests that
Anand deliberately lost'."


If Nunn made the comment in 1997 then Parr quoting his 1978 rating,
while trying to denigrate those who ask honest questions - well, Parr
for the course. Larry comes out with a goose egg again.


The real fraud here is by Taylor Kingston who writes above, "Seeming
to reply to Evans in his foreword to 'Paul Keres: The Quest for
Perfection' (ICE, 1997)".


However, Grandmaster Evans wrote his article in 1999, two years later.
Thus, Grandmaster John Nunn was not replying to Grandmaster Evans at
all.


Thus, this once again establishes that Taylor Kingston has LIED.


Our poor Sam is so inept on even simple matters. The Evans article
in question, "The Tragedy of Paul Keres," appeared in the October
**--1996--** issue of Chess Life.

I know, because I have that issue in front of me as I type this. I'm
sure even Larry Parr, Sam's most ardent supporter in this forum, will
agree Sam is wrong in claiming the Evans article did not appear until
1999.
This Evans date has been stated many times on this forum, so Sam has
not even the wisp of an excuse. When Sam wants to claim something is a
lie, facts are of no importance, and he is quite willing to lie
himself.
Perhaps Sam did too much LSD back at Cal Berkeley, while listening
to Jim Hendrix:

"Well if 6 / Turned out to be 9 / I don't mind."

Sam and Jimi may not mind, but most of us do.

Ads
  #2  
Old March 14th 08, 07:15 PM posted to rec.games.chess.misc,rec.games.chess.politics
Rob
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,112
Default If 6 Was 9, or, Can Sam Sloan Get Anything Right?

On Mar 14, 12:56*pm, wrote:
* In another thread, our inimitable Sam Sloan (I think the real one

this time) wrote:

On Mar 14, 12:18 pm, SBD wrote:





On Mar 14, 10:06 am, wrote:
* "Seeming to reply to Evans in his foreword to 'Paul Keres: The Quest
for Perfection' (ICE, 1997), Nunn says 'Attempts to analyze the games
themselves for evidence of Keres' suicidal efforts ... appear to be
misguided' and notes that Vishy Anand, in his 1995 title match with
Kasparov, committed two 'elementary errors far worse than any
committed by Keres in ... 1948 ... and nobody seriously suggests that
Anand deliberately lost'."

If Nunn made the comment in 1997 then Parr quoting his 1978 rating,
while trying to denigrate those who ask honest questions - well, Parr
for the course. Larry comes out with a goose egg again.
The real fraud here is by Taylor Kingston who writes above, "Seeming
to reply to Evans in his foreword to 'Paul Keres: The Quest for
Perfection' (ICE, 1997)".
However, Grandmaster Evans wrote his article in 1999, two years later.
Thus, Grandmaster John Nunn was not replying to Grandmaster Evans at
all.
Thus, this once again establishes that Taylor Kingston has LIED.


* Our poor Sam is so inept on even simple matters. The Evans article
in question, "The Tragedy of Paul Keres," appeared in the October
**--1996--** issue of Chess Life.

* I know, because I have that issue in front of me as I type this. I'm
sure even Larry Parr, Sam's most ardent supporter in this forum, will
agree Sam is wrong in claiming the Evans article did not appear until
1999.
* This Evans date has been stated many times on this forum, so Sam has
not even the wisp of an excuse. When Sam wants to claim something is a
lie, facts are of no importance, and he is quite willing to lie
himself.
* Perhaps Sam did too much LSD back at Cal Berkeley, while listening
to Jim Hendrix:

* *"Well if 6 / Turned out to be 9 / I don't mind."

* Sam and Jimi may not mind, but most of us do.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Dosen't syphillis cause dementia too?
  #3  
Old March 16th 08, 07:27 PM posted to rec.games.chess.misc,rec.games.chess.politics
ttk5079@gmail.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 789
Default If 6 Was 9, or, Can Sam Sloan Get Anything Right?

On Mar 14, 1:56*pm, wrote:

* In another thread, our inimitable Sam Sloan (I think the real one
this time) wrote:

The real fraud here is by Taylor Kingston who writes above, "Seeming
to reply to Evans in his foreword to 'Paul Keres: The Quest for
Perfection' (ICE, 1997)".

However, Grandmaster Evans wrote his article in 1999, two years later.
Thus, Grandmaster John Nunn was not replying to Grandmaster Evans at
all.
Thus, this once again establishes that Taylor Kingston has LIED.


* Our poor Sam is so inept on even simple matters. The Evans article
in question, "The Tragedy of Paul Keres," appeared in the October
**--1996--** issue of Chess Life.

* I know, because I have that issue in front of me as I type this. I'm
sure even Larry Parr, Sam's most ardent supporter in this forum, will
agree Sam is wrong in claiming the Evans article did not appear until
1999.
* This Evans date has been stated many times on this forum, so Sam has
not even the wisp of an excuse. When Sam wants to claim something is a
lie, facts are of no importance, and he is quite willing to lie
himself.
* Perhaps Sam did too much LSD back at Cal Berkeley, while listening
to Jim Hendrix:

* *"Well if 6 / Turned out to be 9 / I don't mind."

* Sam and Jimi may not mind, but most of us do.


Looking back at other Sloan posts, it's quite easy to find other
erroneous statements Sam has written about me over the years. Two
others a

1. That chess historian Edward G. Winter and I are the same person
(3 March 2006, see http://tinyurl.com/382e2z).
2. That I was born in 1956. (ibid.)

Most recently, and to me most amusing, is the revelation that while
Sam has for years been highly critical of my articles on the Keres-
Botvinnik case, he has never actually read them. This despite their
being published in Chess Life and being available at www.chesscafe.com
for about 10 years now.
This explains a lot, in particular Sam's railing about things
supposedly in the articles, but which actually are not there at all.
For example this, from http://tinyurl.com/2389j6 on 13 March 2008:

"Taylor Kingston wrote here that, based on his own analysis of the
games, the games were legitimate and not thrown."

In fact I never wrote anything of the sort.

It is a never-ending source of wonder to me that factual reality
plays such a small part in Sam Sloan's world. Sam, here are a couple
of theme songs for you:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DsCUopuxsxU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnzHtm1jhL4
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Paul Truong is the Fake Sam Sloan BarbaraVilliers rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 0 August 1st 06 12:33 PM
Sam Sloan appears in X3 Kenneth Sloan rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 27 June 16th 06 07:23 AM
Sam Sloan appears in X3 Kenneth Sloan rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 27 June 16th 06 07:23 AM
Request for Arbitration of Paul Rubin vs. Sam Sloan Sam Sloan rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 45 March 27th 06 04:38 AM
Request for Arbitration of Paul Rubin vs. Sam Sloan Sam Sloan alt.chess (Alternative Chess Group) 45 March 27th 06 04:38 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 ChessBanter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Hotels - Credit Cards - Bad Credit Loan - Car Insurance - Money