![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: anything, right, sam, sloan |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
In another thread, our inimitable Sam Sloan (I think the real one
this time) wrote: On Mar 14, 12:18 pm, SBD wrote: On Mar 14, 10:06 am, wrote: "Seeming to reply to Evans in his foreword to 'Paul Keres: The Quest for Perfection' (ICE, 1997), Nunn says 'Attempts to analyze the games themselves for evidence of Keres' suicidal efforts ... appear to be misguided' and notes that Vishy Anand, in his 1995 title match with Kasparov, committed two 'elementary errors far worse than any committed by Keres in ... 1948 ... and nobody seriously suggests that Anand deliberately lost'." If Nunn made the comment in 1997 then Parr quoting his 1978 rating, while trying to denigrate those who ask honest questions - well, Parr for the course. Larry comes out with a goose egg again. The real fraud here is by Taylor Kingston who writes above, "Seeming to reply to Evans in his foreword to 'Paul Keres: The Quest for Perfection' (ICE, 1997)". However, Grandmaster Evans wrote his article in 1999, two years later. Thus, Grandmaster John Nunn was not replying to Grandmaster Evans at all. Thus, this once again establishes that Taylor Kingston has LIED. Our poor Sam is so inept on even simple matters. The Evans article in question, "The Tragedy of Paul Keres," appeared in the October **--1996--** issue of Chess Life. I know, because I have that issue in front of me as I type this. I'm sure even Larry Parr, Sam's most ardent supporter in this forum, will agree Sam is wrong in claiming the Evans article did not appear until 1999. This Evans date has been stated many times on this forum, so Sam has not even the wisp of an excuse. When Sam wants to claim something is a lie, facts are of no importance, and he is quite willing to lie himself. Perhaps Sam did too much LSD back at Cal Berkeley, while listening to Jim Hendrix: "Well if 6 / Turned out to be 9 / I don't mind." Sam and Jimi may not mind, but most of us do. |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mar 14, 12:56*pm, wrote:
* In another thread, our inimitable Sam Sloan (I think the real one this time) wrote: On Mar 14, 12:18 pm, SBD wrote: On Mar 14, 10:06 am, wrote: * "Seeming to reply to Evans in his foreword to 'Paul Keres: The Quest for Perfection' (ICE, 1997), Nunn says 'Attempts to analyze the games themselves for evidence of Keres' suicidal efforts ... appear to be misguided' and notes that Vishy Anand, in his 1995 title match with Kasparov, committed two 'elementary errors far worse than any committed by Keres in ... 1948 ... and nobody seriously suggests that Anand deliberately lost'." If Nunn made the comment in 1997 then Parr quoting his 1978 rating, while trying to denigrate those who ask honest questions - well, Parr for the course. Larry comes out with a goose egg again. The real fraud here is by Taylor Kingston who writes above, "Seeming to reply to Evans in his foreword to 'Paul Keres: The Quest for Perfection' (ICE, 1997)". However, Grandmaster Evans wrote his article in 1999, two years later. Thus, Grandmaster John Nunn was not replying to Grandmaster Evans at all. Thus, this once again establishes that Taylor Kingston has LIED. * Our poor Sam is so inept on even simple matters. The Evans article in question, "The Tragedy of Paul Keres," appeared in the October **--1996--** issue of Chess Life. * I know, because I have that issue in front of me as I type this. I'm sure even Larry Parr, Sam's most ardent supporter in this forum, will agree Sam is wrong in claiming the Evans article did not appear until 1999. * This Evans date has been stated many times on this forum, so Sam has not even the wisp of an excuse. When Sam wants to claim something is a lie, facts are of no importance, and he is quite willing to lie himself. * Perhaps Sam did too much LSD back at Cal Berkeley, while listening to Jim Hendrix: * *"Well if 6 / Turned out to be 9 / I don't mind." * Sam and Jimi may not mind, but most of us do.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Dosen't syphillis cause dementia too? |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mar 14, 1:56*pm, wrote:
* In another thread, our inimitable Sam Sloan (I think the real one this time) wrote: The real fraud here is by Taylor Kingston who writes above, "Seeming to reply to Evans in his foreword to 'Paul Keres: The Quest for Perfection' (ICE, 1997)". However, Grandmaster Evans wrote his article in 1999, two years later. Thus, Grandmaster John Nunn was not replying to Grandmaster Evans at all. Thus, this once again establishes that Taylor Kingston has LIED. * Our poor Sam is so inept on even simple matters. The Evans article in question, "The Tragedy of Paul Keres," appeared in the October **--1996--** issue of Chess Life. * I know, because I have that issue in front of me as I type this. I'm sure even Larry Parr, Sam's most ardent supporter in this forum, will agree Sam is wrong in claiming the Evans article did not appear until 1999. * This Evans date has been stated many times on this forum, so Sam has not even the wisp of an excuse. When Sam wants to claim something is a lie, facts are of no importance, and he is quite willing to lie himself. * Perhaps Sam did too much LSD back at Cal Berkeley, while listening to Jim Hendrix: * *"Well if 6 / Turned out to be 9 / I don't mind." * Sam and Jimi may not mind, but most of us do. Looking back at other Sloan posts, it's quite easy to find other erroneous statements Sam has written about me over the years. Two others a 1. That chess historian Edward G. Winter and I are the same person (3 March 2006, see http://tinyurl.com/382e2z). 2. That I was born in 1956. (ibid.) Most recently, and to me most amusing, is the revelation that while Sam has for years been highly critical of my articles on the Keres- Botvinnik case, he has never actually read them. This despite their being published in Chess Life and being available at www.chesscafe.com for about 10 years now. This explains a lot, in particular Sam's railing about things supposedly in the articles, but which actually are not there at all. For example this, from http://tinyurl.com/2389j6 on 13 March 2008: "Taylor Kingston wrote here that, based on his own analysis of the games, the games were legitimate and not thrown." In fact I never wrote anything of the sort. It is a never-ending source of wonder to me that factual reality plays such a small part in Sam Sloan's world. Sam, here are a couple of theme songs for you: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DsCUopuxsxU http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnzHtm1jhL4 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Paul Truong is the Fake Sam Sloan | BarbaraVilliers | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | August 1st 06 12:33 PM |
| Sam Sloan appears in X3 | Kenneth Sloan | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 27 | June 16th 06 07:23 AM |
| Sam Sloan appears in X3 | Kenneth Sloan | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 27 | June 16th 06 07:23 AM |
| Request for Arbitration of Paul Rubin vs. Sam Sloan | Sam Sloan | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 45 | March 27th 06 04:38 AM |
| Request for Arbitration of Paul Rubin vs. Sam Sloan | Sam Sloan | alt.chess (Alternative Chess Group) | 45 | March 27th 06 04:38 AM |