![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: botvinnik, ogoniek |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
In Cheron, and other sources, the following study by Botvinnik is
given: 8/8/4kpp1/8/2KPP3/8/6P1/n7 w - - 0 1 White to play and draw It is a very nice study, a very nice addition to the "knight in the corner" groups of studies of N+P(s) vs. Ps. It is well worth taking the time to try to solve it, and if you can't, just about any computer (except GETCLUB and IVAN, of course) will find the continuation - although my Fritz9 takes a bit. My question is about the magazine Ogoniek, which is the original source for the study, having been published in 1952. In one place, it is listed as an "avant-garde" magazine, not a place where you would expect to find a Botvinnik study (let alone a Russian magazine of that type being in existence at all at that time). Can anyone supply brief details? Thanks! SBD |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mar 24, 12:28*pm, SBD wrote:
In Cheron, and other sources, the following study by Botvinnik is given: 8/8/4kpp1/8/2KPP3/8/6P1/n7 w - - 0 1 White to play and draw It is a very nice study, a very nice addition to the "knight in the corner" groups of studies of N+P(s) vs. Ps. It is well worth taking the time to try to solve it, and if you can't, just about any computer (except GETCLUB and IVAN, of course) will find the continuation - although my Fritz9 takes a bit. My question is about the magazine Ogoniek, which is the original source for the study, having been published in 1952. In one place, it is listed as an "avant-garde" magazine, not a place where you would expect to find a Botvinnik study (let alone a Russian magazine of that type being in existence at all at that time). Can anyone supply brief details? Thanks! SBD Steve, you might have better luck posting this in a Russian-oriented newsgroup. I'll tell you what (very) little I know, which comes from a caption to a cartoon reprinted in a 1954 BCM. There it was transliterated as Ogonyok. It seems to have a been a weekly, and it may have been more chess-oriented than you think. I say this because the 1954 cartoon depicted the Russian chess team returning in triumph from the 1954 Olympiad. Whether the magazine was at all "avant-garde" I can't say. The cartoon (which I used in the 2004 International Chess Calendar) just seems a straightforward "Hooray for our guys!" celebration of national triumph, quite in keeping with mainstream Soviet culture at the time. But one can hardly generalize from such a small sample. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks again Taylor. Your help in factual matters is always
appreciated. Having that name the way you spelled it revealed the following: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ogonyok It may not have that much chess content. You would be surprised how many Russian newspapers and magazines still run little chess columns with original problems. You're a big help, and if I ever write that book..... |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Botvinnik argues with Taimanov | zdrakec | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 5 | January 18th 08 05:00 PM |
| Botvinnik becomes a grandmaster | zdrakec | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 6 | January 2nd 08 02:38 PM |
| The Devil's Disciple | parrthenon@cs.com | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 208 | November 24th 07 01:42 AM |
| The Devil's Disciple | parrthenon@cs.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 206 | November 24th 07 01:42 AM |
| Botvinnik v Dus Chotimorsky | Alan OBrien | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 4 | March 22nd 06 03:08 PM |