On Apr 1, 9:01 pm, Kenneth Sloan wrote:
samsloan wrote:

This game is a hoax. I never played any such game.

Also, the game is a beginner's game. No reasonable player would play
like this.

Sam Sloan

Sam is absolutely correct. Here is the way that Sam really plays:

http://www.cis.uab.edu/sloan/ChessGames/SloanVsSloan/

--
Kenneth Sloan
Computer and Information Sciences +1-205-932-2213
University of Alabama at Birmingham FAX +1-205-934-5473
Birmingham, AL 35294-1170 http://KennethRSloan.com/

OK. I realize that this looks like a terrible game and I made many bad
moves, but I usually win games like this because my opponent gets
confused.

If I had just played 24. Rg2, I would have survived a bit longer and
might have eventually won the game.

The game posted by Rob Mitchell is by vastly weaker players. It looks
like a game that Sonny might have played.

Sam Sloan

On Apr 1, 10:20 pm, samsloan wrote:
On Apr 1, 9:01 pm, Kenneth Sloan wrote:



samsloan wrote:

This game is a hoax. I never played any such game.

Also, the game is a beginner's game. No reasonable player would play
like this.

Sam Sloan

Sam is absolutely correct. Here is the way that Sam really plays:

http://www.cis.uab.edu/sloan/ChessGames/SloanVsSloan/

--
Kenneth Sloan
Computer and Information Sciences +1-205-932-2213
University of Alabama at Birmingham FAX +1-205-934-5473
Birmingham, AL 35294-1170 http://KennethRSloan.com/

OK. I realize that this looks like a terrible game and I made many bad
moves, but I usually win games like this because my opponent gets
confused.

If I had just played 24. Rg2, I would have survived a bit longer and
might have eventually won the game.

The game posted by Rob Mitchell is by vastly weaker players. It looks
like a game that Sonny might have played.

Sam Sloan

Sam,
You are a vastly weaker player! LOL

On Apr 1, 10:21 pm, Rob wrote:

Sam,
You are a vastly weaker player! LOL

Rob Mitchell does not play chess AT ALL.

On Apr 1, 10:23 pm, samsloan wrote:
On Apr 1, 10:21 pm, Rob wrote:

Sam,
You are a vastly weaker player! LOL

Rob Mitchell does not play chess AT ALL.

LOL
Thats right. I don't "play" when I sit down at the board.
SOmething that surprised you

On Apr 1, 7:36 pm, samsloan wrote:

This game is a hoax.

The OP must be trying to emulate his buddy the Fake Sam Sloan. Talk
about the ape imitating the lion; in this case it's the ape imitating
the liar.

On Apr 1, 8:28 am, Rob wrote:
Here is the recent loss Sloan suffered. Jerry Nash of the USCF
officiated the match. It was a single game, no time limit. Mitchell
drew white and began the game. Sloan defended with black.
At the end of the game Nash presented Mitchell with a cashiers check
in the amount of 10k.

A check which will possibly go towards a Chess Masterminds broadcast.
Lucky us.

On Apr 1, 10:23 pm, samsloan wrote:
On Apr 1, 10:21 pm, Rob wrote:

Sam,
You are a vastly weaker player! LOL

Rob Mitchell does not play chess AT ALL.

Chessbase will be publishing the game soon.

On Apr 1, 9:28 am, Rob wrote:

Here is the recent loss Sloan suffered. Jerry Nash of the USCF

Hey, would that be Nash as in Nash-ville,
Tennessee?


officiated the match. It was a single game, no time limit.


Bad idea. Did you not see what happened
when those two Russians with the K-names
went at it, no time limit, no substitutions? It
was something akin to the movie "Rollerball",
starring James Caan.


Mitchell
drew white and began the game. Sloan defended with black.
At the end of the game Nash presented Mitchell with a cashiers check
in the amount of 10k.


Ten kroner, eh? Not very much, but then, it
was only a one-game match.


Here is the PGN

Mitchell white
vs
Sloan black

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f5 3.d4


Ohmygawd! This reminds me of a recent
game I played at GetClub, where I had
Black and after 1. e4 e5, 2. Bc4 Nf6, the
confounded machine hit me with 3. d4!?!,
and I was forced to calculate actual
variations-- right in the opening! That was
a close one, too. If I recall, we had
quite a tussle and ended up in a drawable
Rook ending, which I quite naturally won.


fxe4 4.Nxe5 Nf6 5.Nc3 d5 6.f3 Bf5 7.fxe4 Nxe4
8.Nxe4 Bxe4 9.Bd3 h5 10.Bxe4 Qh4+ 11.Kf1 Qxe4 12.Qf3 Qxf3+ 13.Nxf3 Nc6
14.Bg5 Kf7 15.Ke2 Re8+ 16.Kd2 Re4 17.c3 Rg4 18.g3 Kg6 19.Bf4 Bd6
20.Ne5+ Nxe5 21.dxe5 Be7 22.h3 Rg5 23.Bxg5 Bxg5+ 24.Kd3 c5 25.Rhf1 Be7
26.Rae1 c4+ 27.Kc2 Kh6 28.Rf7 Re8 29.e6 b5 30.a3 a5 31.Rf5 Rd8 32.Ree5
g6 33.Rf7 1-0


The trouble with this ruse is that nobody
would take the idea seriously-- unless it
were preceded by vicious attacks back
and forth between the two players, and I
think it goes without saying that SS
would be expected to give QN odds and
still win.


-- help bot