This is what I wrote to prosecutor Murray, and what he snipped 2 parts of

1) Look at the name of the thread - d4 the only way ... snort
2) Daft isn't it?
3) If I misrepresented Spassky's use of the KG, where?

I really would rather talk the chess, not Murray's rendition of what I said
which he is not brave enough to actually mention, and also cannot contest.
He snipped it!

This is a chess newsgroup, if you can't discuss the chess aspect of it, then
go away with your asinine opinions. Most strong players just gave this group
up in terms of talking chess. Am I the last one here to attempt it?

I really am not attached to talking chess with people who have no interest
in it whatever. So ... inevitably, I must consider who engages chess
subjects which interest me, and if there is nothing, then, pfft! Let
Help-Bog rule the place, aided by his enemy, the great postal GM. And I will
go away too, and leave you to the joys of the Brennan, the nadir principle,
of those fascinated/afraid people who only ever write **** about others who
do not.

Murray will not even understand what I wrote above. But I do not write it
for him. This used to be an interesting group to discuss chess, but a
fellowship of negativity grew here, like a cancer on it.

Phil Innes

On Apr 1, 6:23 pm, "Chess One" wrote:


This is a chess newsgroup, if you can't discuss the chess aspect of it, then
go away with your asinine opinions. Most strong players just gave this group


I think maybe certain weak players drove them
away... and worst of all, the pretenders, who lay
claim to their hard-earned titles; you know, like
nearly-an-IM, for instance. Some even try to
fake a FIDE rating, tossing out numbers like
2450... numbers which only seem to exist in
the realms of the imagination.


Let Help-Bog rule the place


Oh, sure-- pretend that you "let me" win! LOL

Fact is, as at GetClub, I *worked* my way to
the top -- the hard way -- by losing to everybody
below me. Wait-- that didn't come out right.


Murray will not even understand what I wrote above. But I do not write it
for him. This used to be an interesting group to discuss chess, but a
fellowship of negativity grew here, like a cancer on it.


From what I've seen, the dregs like the Evans
ratpack have always polluted rgc; nothing much
has changed except the temporary -- I hope --
takeover by Sam Sloan Lawsuits, inc.

One titanic improvement would be for these
dregs to disappear, so discussion could turn
from battling their never-ending supply of ad
hominem and lies to rationally discussing
issues relating to chess. I'm not holding my
breath.


-- help bot