These remarks are all being posted today on Susan's Blog at:
http://susanpolgar.blogspot.com/2008...-for-uscf.html

Some of the remarks are so typical of Paul Truong a/k/a "The Fake Sam
Sloan" that he must have written them. For example:

"I bet you we'll be able to get rid of Polgar and deport her back to
Hungary soon.

"Hah! That is a laugh Mr. Laughing Laugherty!

"I will laugh when you get put in prison to be constantly sodomized by
the big men you put in prison while you were a pathetic crooked
judge."

Now, go back and look at "The Fake Sam Sloan" postings. You will see
that the style is the same, especially the sexual references. The
illusion to being sodomized while in prison was a frequent theme in
the Fake Sam Sloan postings. Since Truong disappeared for 16 years
from 1986 to 2002 and there is no hint nor clue as to where he was or
what he was doing during those 16 years, there are those who suspect
that he might have been in prison then. Also, remember that Susan's
blog is "moderated" meaning that no posting is allowed to appear there
unless it has been approved by Susan.

Sam Sloan

"samsloan" wrote in message
...
These remarks are all being posted today on Susan's Blog at:
http://susanpolgar.blogspot.com/2008...-for-uscf.html

Some of the remarks are so typical of Paul Truong a/k/a "The Fake Sam
Sloan" that he must have written them. For example:

'must have' says the real sam sloan, well... the http://groups.google.com
Sam Sloan, who... to be clear continues to diss Paul Truong and Susan
Polgar - and if PT wrote this his English is much improved! as well as his
sense of humor, read on, its a hoot!

but it is so untypical of the real paul Truong, and by the way, of the real
Sam Sloan, that we must challenge an apparent Sloan post to why 'must'
since, what i personally observe of both men, is that both 'must not' need
express themselves in such excessive crudity, its not even a full moon!

"I bet you we'll be able to get rid of Polgar and deport her back to
Hungary soon.

"Hah! That is a laugh Mr. Laughing Laugherty!

"I will laugh when you get put in prison to be constantly sodomized by
the big men you put in prison while you were a pathetic crooked
judge."

which is signed, anonymous

Now, go back and look at "The Fake Sam Sloan" postings.

Not so fast! let us report what 'anonymous' said next:-

Ahhh, the same drivel from Lafferty as usual. He should go back and visit
the good folks at Chessville.com again. They miss abusing him and Payne over
there. :-)

Let's see, with Goichberg & his friends running the show, how are things
working out for the USCF? Losing money, losing sponsors, accurately
ridiculed as one of the worst national federations in the world, yet the
same fools want to keep them in charge and lie through their teeth and use
personal attacks & absolutely stupid "go back to Hungary" remarks to try and
run off the very people who could actually turn that incredibly inept
organization around. Does anybody see any sign that Lafferty, Goichberg,
Payne, etc are actually trying to better the USCF or promote chess in the
US?

Saturday, April 12, 2008 12:34:00 AM CDT
Anonymous said...

Everyday we have the Laugherty, Sloani, Gordoni, Robertsi, Hankeni and
Paynei show, back and forth while doing zilch for chess. But they're good
with insults and lies. What kind of obnoxious pigs would attack children and
women while worshiping Sloani?

Other people, not owning their names, continued...

Anonymous said...

I think that in the next 10-20 years, we'll see a huge payoff from all
Susan's efforts in promoting chess among children... a new crop of strong
successful players.

Saturday, April 12, 2008 6:45:00 AM CDT
Anonymous said...
"a new crop of strong successful players."

Is that a target set? Just wondering. Or only a phrase?

Saturday, April 12, 2008 7:31:00 AM CDT
Anonymous said...
A new organization....that is what we need. It's time and since so many GM's
are disgruntled with the USCF, it's logical to assume that they might be
interested in a new organization.

I think many would go along with it. The USCF is slowly dying, anyway. Why
wait? Begin anew.


You will see
that the style is the same, especially the sexual references. The
illusion to being sodomized while in prison was a frequent theme in
the Fake Sam Sloan postings.

Golly gosh! Is Sam Sloan suggesting that the FSS actually supports Susan
Polgar guffaw

Or is the FSS suggesting it? guffaw

or that this is some fear a person has, projected outward - is this a
dominant theme in the FSS material? At least I credit Sloan and/or the FSS
with perfunctory analysis of the material, which is more than his supporters
have dared attempt in public

Since Truong disappeared for 16 years
from 1986 to 2002 and there is no hint nor clue as to where he was or
what he was doing during those 16 years, there are those who suspect
that he might have been in prison then.

There are 'those'




R



O






F









L









!








!










Also, remember that Susan's
blog is "moderated" meaning that no posting is allowed to appear there
unless it has been approved by Susan.

we all know that, don't we? don't we?

what a farce of a post by a fixated person this past 20 years, who sadly got
beat out of the race by a Vietnamese boat-bloke, and who weepeth here
everafter

maybe the FSS and the Sloan share certain attributes? neither getting their
Suzie, and I cry too for Laughterty and the Crim-anons

snubbed again, by the ever-elusive skirt

/ arthur rimbaud


)))


Phil Innes

PS: chess computer snipped, since,

Q. how many chess-computer guys does it take to screw in a light bulb?

A. one, and it isn't funny



Sam Sloan

On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:28:08 -0400, "Chess One"
wrote:


Golly gosh! Is Sam Sloan suggesting that the FSS actually supports Susan
Polgar guffaw

As I recall, the FSS quite regularly attacked or forged the identities
of folks who either criticized Polgar or were on the opposite sides of
issues from Polgar. For example, after J. Shahade, in her book,
"Chess Bitch", made light of some of Polgar/Truong's coaching
techniques, a number of FSS sexist remarks appeared about her.

Does this *prove* anything? Not necessarily ( I agree with Guy Macon
on this) but it makes one wonder what Innes is guffawing about.

Mike Murray wrote:

As I recall, the FSS quite regularly attacked or forged the identities
of folks who either criticized Polgar or were on the opposite sides of
issues from Polgar. For example, after J. Shahade, in her book,
"Chess Bitch", made light of some of Polgar/Truong's coaching
techniques, a number of FSS sexist remarks appeared about her.

Does this *prove* anything? Not necessarily ( I agree with Guy Macon
on this)

The phrase I like to use in such cases is, "Not proof, but certainly
suggestive." When I see a field full of white sheep, that isn't proof
that they are white -- it only proves that the side of each sheep
facing me is white -- but it does suggest that the sheep are white
on both sides.


--
Guy Macon
http://www.guymacon.com/