![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: kramnik |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
A new feature of FIDE website: http://ratings.fide.com/card.phtml?event=4101588:
Color Percentage: White : Win: 52% Draw: 22% Loss: 26% Black : Win: 0% Draw: 46% Loss: 54% Statistics are valid for the tournaments submitted with color information after January 2007. 0 wins with Black? Shocking! |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Chvsanchez" wrote in message ... A new feature of FIDE website: http://ratings.fide.com/card.phtml?event=4101588: Color Percentage: White : Win: 52% Draw: 22% Loss: 26% Black : Win: 0% Draw: 46% Loss: 54% Statistics are valid for the tournaments submitted with color information after January 2007. 0 wins with Black? Shocking! Statistics are valid for the tournaments submitted with color information AFTER JANUARY 2007. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 14 May 2008 21:42:56 -0700 (PDT), Chvsanchez
wrote: A new feature of FIDE website: http://ratings.fide.com/card.phtml?event=4101588: Color Percentage: White : Win: 52% Draw: 22% Loss: 26% Black : Win: 0% Draw: 46% Loss: 54% Statistics are valid for the tournaments submitted with color information after January 2007. 0 wins with Black? Shocking! That's because Kramnik has been playing the Petroff rather than the Svesnikov Sicilian lately. Most people don't know that Kramnik is probably the best player of the Svesnikov Sicilian. EZoto |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On May 15, 12:42*am, Chvsanchez wrote:
A new feature of FIDE website:http://ratings.fide.com/card.phtml?event=4101588: Color Percentage: White : Win: 52% *Draw: 22% *Loss: 26% Black : Win: 0% *Draw: 46% *Loss: 54% Statistics are valid for the tournaments submitted with color information after January 2007. 0 wins with Black? Shocking! How can White have lost 26% of these games, yet Black has won 0%? And White has drawn 22%, but Black drew 46%?? Who was White playing against -- Beige? Pink? Chartreuse? With whom did Black draw -- Magenta? Puce? Teal? |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On May 15, 7:28*pm, wrote:
On May 15, 12:42*am, Chvsanchez wrote: A new feature of FIDE website:http://ratings.fide.com/card.phtml?event=4101588: Color Percentage: White : Win: 52% *Draw: 22% *Loss: 26% Black : Win: 0% *Draw: 46% *Loss: 54% Statistics are valid for the tournaments submitted with color information after January 2007. 0 wins with Black? Shocking! * How can White have lost 26% of these games, yet Black has won 0%? And White has drawn 22%, but Black drew 46%?? Who was White playing against -- Beige? Pink? Chartreuse? With whom did Black draw -- Magenta? Puce? Teal? Oh, Taylor. Say he played 100 games as White, and won 52 of them, drew 22 of them, and lost 26 of them. That would mean that he won 52% of his games with White, drew 22%, and lost 26%. Similarly, say he played 100 games as Black, and drew 46 of them, and lost 54 of them. You see where we go with this... ![]() Regards, zdrakec |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On May 16, 10:34*am, zdrakec wrote:
On May 15, 7:28*pm, wrote: On May 15, 12:42*am, Chvsanchez wrote: A new feature of FIDE website:http://ratings.fide.com/card.phtml?event=4101588: Color Percentage: White : Win: 52% *Draw: 22% *Loss: 26% Black : Win: 0% *Draw: 46% *Loss: 54% Statistics are valid for the tournaments submitted with color information after January 2007. 0 wins with Black? Shocking! * How can White have lost 26% of these games, yet Black has won 0%? And White has drawn 22%, but Black drew 46%?? Who was White playing against -- Beige? Pink? Chartreuse? With whom did Black draw -- Magenta? Puce? Teal? Oh, Taylor. Say he played 100 games as White, and won 52 of them, drew 22 of them, and lost 26 of them. That would mean that he won 52% of his games with White, drew 22%, and lost 26%. Similarly, say he played 100 games as Black, and drew 46 of them, and lost 54 of them. You see where we go with this... ![]() He who? The page the link takes me to doesn't say. I had thought the percentages referred to the results of a group of players against each other. But if it refers to just one individual, then I was mistaken and the stats are plausible. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On May 16, 10:21*am, wrote:
On May 16, 10:34*am, zdrakec wrote: On May 15, 7:28*pm, wrote: On May 15, 12:42*am, Chvsanchez wrote: A new feature of FIDE website:http://ratings.fide.com/card.phtml?event=4101588: Color Percentage: White : Win: 52% *Draw: 22% *Loss: 26% Black : Win: 0% *Draw: 46% *Loss: 54% Statistics are valid for the tournaments submitted with color information after January 2007. 0 wins with Black? Shocking! * How can White have lost 26% of these games, yet Black has won 0%? And White has drawn 22%, but Black drew 46%?? Who was White playing against -- Beige? Pink? Chartreuse? With whom did Black draw -- Magenta? Puce? Teal? Oh, Taylor. Say he played 100 games as White, and won 52 of them, drew 22 of them, and lost 26 of them. That would mean that he won 52% of his games with White, drew 22%, and lost 26%. Similarly, say he played 100 games as Black, and drew 46 of them, and lost 54 of them. You see where we go with this... ![]() * He who? The page the link takes me to doesn't say. I had thought the percentages referred to the results of a group of players against each other. But if it refers to just one individual, then I was mistaken and the stats are plausible.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I certainly read them as referring to one player, namely, Kramnik. If indeed the stats refer to a group of players, then they are impossible, of course ![]() |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 16 mayo, 12:24, zdrakec wrote:
On May 16, 10:21*am, wrote: On May 16, 10:34*am, zdrakec wrote: On May 15, 7:28*pm, wrote: On May 15, 12:42*am, Chvsanchez wrote: A new feature of FIDE website:http://ratings.fide.com/card.phtml?event=4101588: Color Percentage: White : Win: 52% *Draw: 22% *Loss: 26% Black : Win: 0% *Draw: 46% *Loss: 54% Statistics are valid for the tournaments submitted with color information after January 2007. 0 wins with Black? Shocking! * How can White have lost 26% of these games, yet Black has won 0%? And White has drawn 22%, but Black drew 46%?? Who was White playing against -- Beige? Pink? Chartreuse? With whom did Black draw -- Magenta? Puce? Teal? Oh, Taylor. Say he played 100 games as White, and won 52 of them, drew 22 of them, and lost 26 of them. That would mean that he won 52% of his games with White, drew 22%, and lost 26%. Similarly, say he played 100 games as Black, and drew 46 of them, and lost 54 of them. You see where we go with this... ![]() * He who? The page the link takes me to doesn't say. I had thought the percentages referred to the results of a group of players against each other. But if it refers to just one individual, then I was mistaken and the stats are plausible.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I certainly read them as referring to one player, namely, Kramnik. If indeed the stats refer to a group of players, then they are impossible, of course - Ocultar texto de la cita -- Mostrar texto de la cita - The correct link is http://ratings.fide.com/card.phtml?event=4101588 Now FIDE is adding the number of games played: Kramnik, Vladimir Color Percentage: 29 game(s) with White : Win: 52% Draw: 22% Loss: 26% 28 game(s) with Black : Win: 0% Draw: 46% Loss: 54% Statistics are valid for the tournaments submitted with color information after January 2007. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cosmic Programmer wrote:
"Chvsanchez" wrote: White : Win: 52% Draw: 22% Loss: 26% Black : Win: 0% Draw: 46% Loss: 54% Statistics are valid for the tournaments submitted with color information after January 2007. 0 wins with Black? Shocking! Statistics are valid for the tournaments submitted with color information AFTER JANUARY 2007. I'm still slightly surprised that Kramnik hasn't won a single game with black in the last fifteen months. And that he's only scored 23% with the black pieces in that time. Seems that Drawnik ought to be renamed Winwithwhitenik or Losewithblacknik. ;-) Dave. -- David Richerby Accelerated Chocolate Widget (TM): www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~davidr/ it's like a thingy that's made of chocolate but it's twice as fast! |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Those previous figures seemed to be a bit odd, so I asked FIDE if
there was something wrong with the calculations, and they answered saying "statistics have been updated". The new figures of Kramnik a Color Percentage: 29 game(s) with White : Win: 52% Draw: 45% Loss: 3% 28 game(s) with Black : Win: 0% Draw: 93% Loss: 7% 0 win with Black. 1 loss with White. 2 losses with Black. Better! |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Support for Kramnik from other GMs | parrthenon@cs.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 11 | October 6th 06 04:50 AM |
| HUGE NEWS!!! Kramnik Forfeits Game # 5 | morphy@rookhouse.com | rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) | 14 | October 2nd 06 03:21 PM |
| Kramnik Internet Simul | Duncan Oxley | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 2 | July 31st 06 01:43 PM |
| Kramnik Internet Simul | Duncan Oxley | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 2 | July 31st 06 01:43 PM |