![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#141
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jul 18, 4:20*pm, (SAT W-7) wrote:
Ivans move is Knight E-6 to D-4 *check .. GetClub Played King at f3 to g2. So IVAN can draw the game if same moves are repeated 3 times. This move was played by thinking for 168 sec by Easy Level. Easy[40 sec / move] - IVAN [80 sec/ move] 1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 cxe4 4. Nxe4 Bf5 5. Nc5 e5 6. Nxb7 Qxd4 7. Qxd4 exd4 8. Nf3 Bc8 9. Na5 Bb4+ 10. Bd2 Bxd2 11. Nxd2 Bf5 12. 0-0-0 Ne7 13. Nd2-b3 0-0 14. Nxd4 Bg4 15. Be2 Bxe2 16. Nxe2 Na6 17. Rd7 Rfe8 18. Nc3 Nc5 19. Rd6 Rad8 20. RxR RxR 21. R-d1 Rxd1 22. Kxd1 f6 23. Nc4 K-f7 24. K-e1 K-e6 25. N-e2 K-d5 26. N-d2 N-f5 27. b3 g5 28. K-f1 g4 29. c3 Nd3 30. a3 c5 31. h3 gxh3 32. c4+ K-d6 33. gxh3 Ne7 34. h4 Nc6 35. Ng3 Nd4 36. N-e4+ Ke5 37. Nc3 h5 38. Nd5 a5 39. K-g2 Nc1 40. b4 cxb4 41. axb4 axb4 42. Nxb4 Ne6 43. Kf3 Nd4 44. Kg2 GetClub is at advantage of 0.91 points It can be drawn if IVAN plays back its knight and the moves are repeated 3 times. Bye Sanny Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html |
|
#142
|
|||
|
|||
|
* BTW, Sanny, are you still predicting GetClub will win within 45
moves? Where's the mate in two, then? In this game IVAN exchanged most of the pieces and End Games started just after 20th move. So GetClub is finding it difficult to finish quickly. Second thing helping IVAN is that GetClubs end Game is very weak. Incase this game were in middlegame till 40th move GetClub would have easily won the game in 45 moves. In just first 15 moves GetClub was 1 pawn ahead. So middlegame of Easy level is so strong that every 20 moves IVAN will loose 1 pawn. IVAN is as strong as Beginner Level. And Easy level is 4 times stronger than Beginner Level. You should play a game with Easy Level and see how strong it has become. I am sure it will be very hard to beat the Easy Level as many new openings have been taught to GetClub. Bye Sanny Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html |
|
#143
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jul 19, 1:12*am, Sanny wrote:
* BTW, Sanny, are you still predicting GetClub will win within 45 moves? Where's the mate in two, then? In this game IVAN exchanged most of the pieces and End Games started just after 20th move. So GetClub is finding it difficult to finish [...formerly "win"] quickly. Second thing helping IVAN is that GetClubs end Game is very weak. Incase this game were in middlegame till 40th move GetClub would have easily won the game in 45 moves. In just first 15 moves GetClub was 1 pawn ahead. So middlegame of Easy level is so strong that every 20 moves IVAN will loose 1 pawn. IVAN is as strong as Beginner Level. Ivan repeatedly *defeated* the Beginner level. And Easy level is 4 times stronger than Beginner Level. You should play a game with Easy Level and see how strong it has become. I am sure it will be very hard to beat the Easy Level as many new openings have been taught to GetClub. In this game, GetClub obtained a winning advantage in the opening and hung onto it for a long time... before throwing the win away. Yes, GetClub is very weak in the endgame. I just played a couple of games (after a longish break) against the lower levels and found the games to be very interesting. In one I was undoubtedly busted in the open- ing, and in the other I gambled on a far-advanced passed pawn I easily obtained early on. In the second of these two games I overlooked an obvious exchange-winning move, but a bit further on it was I who landed the real bone-crusher tactical blow. Very interesting chess-- unlike this boring stuff between GetClub and Ivan, which one could aptly describe as mere wood-shuffling. That's the trouble with computers (and dullards)-- they lack imagination and daring, and long-range strategy. It's always "optimize this" or "neutralize that" with these strange creatures. Why can't a computer be more like a man? If I wanted to play inferior openings, neglect the study of endgames or stay out late, a man would not complain-- oh no! If I failed to call, played chess all night long or even showed up hungover, a bloke would never complain-- certainly not. So then, why can't a computer be more like a man? -- help bot |
|
#144
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ivans move is D-4 to E-6 Knight
Ok if the make the same moves we can call it a draw .. That move was ten seconds .. |
|
#145
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jul 19, 4:20*pm, (SAT W-7) wrote:
Ivans move is D-4 to E-6 *Knight GetClub Played King at g2 to f1. This move was played by thinking for 100 sec by Easy Level. Easy[40 sec / move] - IVAN [80 sec/ move] 1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 cxe4 4. Nxe4 Bf5 5. Nc5 e5 6. Nxb7 Qxd4 7. Qxd4 exd4 8. Nf3 Bc8 9. Na5 Bb4+ 10. Bd2 Bxd2 11. Nxd2 Bf5 12. 0-0-0 Ne7 13. Nd2-b3 0-0 14. Nxd4 Bg4 15. Be2 Bxe2 16. Nxe2 Na6 17. Rd7 Rfe8 18. Nc3 Nc5 19. Rd6 Rad8 20. RxR RxR 21. R-d1 Rxd1 22. Kxd1 f6 23. Nc4 K-f7 24. K-e1 K-e6 25. N-e2 K-d5 26. N-d2 N-f5 27. b3 g5 28. K-f1 g4 29. c3 Nd3 30. a3 c5 31. h3 gxh3 32. c4+ K-d6 33. gxh3 Ne7 34. h4 Nc6 35. Ng3 Nd4 36. N-e4+ Ke5 37. Nc3 h5 38. Nd5 a5 39. K-g2 Nc1 40. b4 cxb4 41. axb4 axb4 42. Nxb4 Ne6 43. Kf3 Nd4 44. Kg2 Ne6 45. Kf1 GetClub is at advantage of 0.89 points GetClub Changed its move as it do not want to draw the game. Ok if the make the same moves we can call it a draw .. That move was ten seconds .. GetClub is one point ahead So it changed its move and do not accept draw. It will be very long game. As IVAN will not be able to stop the c4 pawn unless it gives its one knight. Then it has to draw the game without one knight. Bye Sanny Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html |
|
#146
|
|||
|
|||
|
IVAN is as strong as Beginner Level.
* Ivan repeatedly *defeated* the Beginner level. After the game was improved there was only one game where IVAN won. In that game Beginner was well ahead. But there was a tactical Blunder and it lost a knight. due to that blunder. Beginner is slightly stronger than IVAN. And Easy is 4 times stronger than Beginner as it takes 4 times longer time. * In this game, GetClub obtained a winning advantage in the opening and hung onto it for a long time... before throwing the win away. *Yes, GetClub is very weak in the endgame. That has to be improved now as now Middle & Opening are very good. Once End Game is made stronger too It will play like Heaven. * I just played a couple of games (after a longish break) against the lower levels and found the games to be very interesting. *In one I was undoubtedly busted in the open- ing, and in the other I gambled on a far-advanced passed pawn I easily obtained early on. * *In the second of these two games I overlooked an obvious exchange-winning Yes, I found you took arround 70 moves to win the game with Beginner Level. Try a game with Easy Level. Easy will be a good challenge for you. Bye Sanny Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html |
|
#147
|
|||
|
|||
|
ivans move King E-5 to F-5 .
that move 25 seconds .. GC + I.0 yes lets play until one is checkmated .. |
|
#148
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jul 20, 7:05*am, (SAT W-7) wrote:
yes lets play until one is checkmated .. But that must have already happened. Sanny said "Easy Will win this game in 45 moves." Wasn't that move 45 just now? If so, check the position; you must be in mate already. Sanny couldn't be *_wrong_*, could he? |
|
#149
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jul 20, 2:18*am, Sanny wrote:
IVAN is as strong as Beginner Level. * Ivan repeatedly *defeated* the Beginner level. After the game was improved there was only one game where IVAN won. In that game Beginner was well ahead. But there was a tactical Blunder and it lost a knight. due to that blunder. Beginner is slightly stronger than IVAN. It seems that Sanny is another of those ratpacker style "thinkers" for whom wins are only accepted as evidence of superiority /on a whim/. If his program should repeatedly lose, that too is rejected at his whim, in favor of some random delusion. However, it is noteworthy that in the rare cases in which the GetClub program has won or even drawn, such facts are presented by Sanny as convincing evidence of GetClub's superiority or equality, in strict accordance with well-known principles of logic and reason (not Sanny's momentary whims). Contrasting the above two approaches, one might easily conclude that there is something fishy going on in Sanny's mind... . * In this game, GetClub obtained a winning advantage in the opening and hung onto it for a long time... before throwing the win away. *Yes, GetClub is very weak in the endgame. That has to be improved now as now Middle & Opening are very good. Once End Game is made stronger too It will play like Heaven. Don't worry so much about the endgame. I have noticed that Rybka is also very weak in certain end- games. For instance, if you work through a few key Rook-and-pawn endings with Rybka and the table- bases, you will often see Rybka thinking the position is clearly won when in fact it is a "book" draw. On the other hand, Rybka does seem to find very good moves, in spite of her position-scoring delusions. * I just played a couple of games (after a longish break) against the lower levels and found the games to be very interesting. *In one I was undoubtedly busted in the open- ing, and in the other I gambled on a far-advanced passed pawn I easily obtained early on. * *In the second of these two games I overlooked an obvious exchange-winning Yes, I found you took arround 70 moves to win the game with Beginner Level. Granted that it can be a bit tedious to play through such longish games, but what do you think about them-- are they not far /more interesting/ games than the wood-shifting we have seen in contests between Ivan and GetClub? Try a game with Easy Level. Easy will be a good challenge for you. I had a bit of a rough time with the two easiest levels due to my experimentation in the openings and attempting to not merely trade down and win easily in a theoretically drawable ending. Against higher levels I am more inclined to play it safe, steer toward positional play, bore all the spectators to death, trade pieces and just win by exploiting the all-too-well-known gaping weak- nesses of the opponent. In fact, I do much the same thing in tournament play, but to a lesser degree. I think the fallacy of Sanny's thinking is that the human opponents' play must remain fixed, while his program's will improve if given more thinking time. In reality, many of us humans can -- if we apply ourselves properly -- improve our play by thinking longer, while the ability of the GetClub program consists mainly in spinning its wheels longer, although /some/ improvement in quality of play is inevitable due to the fact that more of the basic tactics are computed. GetClub is still a long way from mastering these basics and so the spectators continue to clamour for Sanny to raise his program's level against Ivan-- a com- mercial program with, presumably, at least a very basic mastery of elementary tactics. I think the delusional approach to chess has been highlighted by the fact that at one point, I had suggested Sanny "correct" the ratings of his various levels by putting them in the correct order with Advance rated highest, then Master and so on down the line; his reply was to let the ratings fall where they may... to let the *results* determine the relative rankings and ratings. As we now know, Sanny eventually did an about-face, "correcting" the obviously screwed up rankings and tossing out their respective results. Certain players were manipulating these ratings by playing commercial programs against the top levels (mainly), thus driving their ratings into the ground while other levels remained as they were, as did the ratings of all the other players. The simplest safeguard against this sort of manipulation is to "fix" the ratings of the program's various levels, and let the ratings of human players "float"; but there has been a lot of tweaking of the pro- gram over time, and as we know, its strength has varied dramatically-- on rare occasion, even approaching that of some commercial programs, like Ivan. -- help bot |
|
#150
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jul 20, 4:05*pm, (SAT W-7) wrote:
ivans move King E-5 to F-5 . GetClub Played King at f1 to e1. This move was played by thinking for 110 sec by Easy Level. Easy[40 sec / move] - IVAN [80 sec/ move] 1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 cxe4 4. Nxe4 Bf5 5. Nc5 e5 6. Nxb7 Qxd4 7. Qxd4 exd4 8. Nf3 Bc8 9. Na5 Bb4+ 10. Bd2 Bxd2 11. Nxd2 Bf5 12. 0-0-0 Ne7 13. Nd2-b3 0-0 14. Nxd4 Bg4 15. Be2 Bxe2 16. Nxe2 Na6 17. Rd7 Rfe8 18. Nc3 Nc5 19. Rd6 Rad8 20. RxR RxR 21. R-d1 Rxd1 22. Kxd1 f6 23. Nc4 K-f7 24. K-e1 K-e6 25. N-e2 K-d5 26. N-d2 N-f5 27. b3 g5 28. K-f1 g4 29. c3 Nd3 30. a3 c5 31. h3 gxh3 32. c4+ K-d6 33. gxh3 Ne7 34. h4 Nc6 35. Ng3 Nd4 36. N-e4+ Ke5 37. Nc3 h5 38. Nd5 a5 39. K-g2 Nc1 40. b4 cxb4 41. axb4 axb4 42. Nxb4 Ne6 43. Kf3 Nd4 44. Kg2 Ne6 45. Kf1 Kf5 46. Ke1 GetClub is at advantage of 0.99 points GC + I.0 yes lets play until one is checkmated .. Bye Sanny Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2900+ Rated player against Easy Level. | Sanny | rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) | 0 | November 14th 08 03:34 PM |
| 2900+ Rated player against Easy Level. | Sanny | rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) | 0 | November 14th 08 03:34 PM |
| 2900+ Rated player against Easy Level. | Sanny | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 0 | November 14th 08 03:34 PM |
| Please Analyze this game between Easy Level & Chrisf | Sanny | alt.chess (Alternative Chess Group) | 33 | April 24th 08 05:47 PM |
| Worlds best game by Rybka against Easy Level. | Sanny | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | April 2nd 08 05:38 PM |