The real difficulty about identifying the FSS was ever to compare the
thousands of anon messages with known diction of various writers,
their specific emphasis and even quantitative analysis of varies words
and terms used. But the FSS was careful! Never writing too much,
sometimes borrowing speech from others, and staying within a
relatively small range of words.

So... some time ago the thought was to go-fish, and by analysis
compare voluntary emotive expressions here, with the Anonymous
expressions of the FSS.

The process was sometimes hilarious, but over 2 years there were lots
of bites at Columbo's heels

Now that the matter is closed, or almost so, those who have looked on
while I fished, may have some ideas of their own. Naturally those will
not be presenting in this forum, but to all those who went after
everything dangled in front of them, thanks for playing.

Cordially, Phil "Inspector Columbo" Innes

On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 08:39:19 -0800 (PST), ChessFire
wrote:

The real difficulty about identifying the FSS was ever to compare the
thousands of anon messages with known diction of various writers,
their specific emphasis and even quantitative analysis of varies words
and terms used. But the FSS was careful! Never writing too much,
sometimes borrowing speech from others, and staying within a
relatively small range of words.

So... some time ago the thought was to go-fish, and by analysis
compare voluntary emotive expressions here, with the Anonymous
expressions of the FSS.

The process was sometimes hilarious, but over 2 years there were lots
of bites at Columbo's heels

Now that the matter is closed, or almost so, those who have looked on
while I fished, may have some ideas of their own. Naturally those will
not be presenting in this forum, but to all those who went after
everything dangled in front of them, thanks for playing.

Cordially, Phil "Inspector Columbo" Innes

Betcha goin' fishin' all the time
We all been fishin' too
Bet your life that the fake's sweet wife
Has caught more fish than you
Many fish bites if you got good bait
Here's a little somethin' I would like to relate
It's time to get your head on straight
You're two buck short and two days late
And your ass is black and blue

(Sorry, Taj)

On Feb 4, 11:39*am, ChessFire wrote:

So... some time ago the thought was to go-fish, and by analysis
compare voluntary emotive expressions here, with the Anonymous
expressions of the FSS.

And the final determination is that anyone who argues with Phil Innes
MUST be the FSS! Brilliant!

On Feb 4, 12:18*pm, The Historian wrote:
On Feb 4, 11:39*am, ChessFire wrote:

So... some time ago the thought was to go-fish, and by analysis
compare voluntary emotive expressions here, with the Anonymous
expressions of the FSS.

And the final determination is that anyone who argues with Phil Innes
MUST be the FSS! Brilliant!

In that case, we have a situation like this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuifqpgpHe0

Fascinating responses so far, on who has, who has not commented.

There are 2 groups of people who have practiced as the FSS had: one
was in a revolving e-mail account and practiced psychological abuses
in chess.computer circa 1992. Another is a group who consorted by e-
mail to defame others.

Now that the gloves are off, and I need not pretend to enjoy
'conversations' with certain louts here, one has already changed his
moniker!

But the analysis of their posts goes much much deeper than this, and
even unto their previous relations and associates — which certainly
make for motivation — and motive is very big factor in all. Ignore the
smoke and misdirection and see the trend and the pattern.

Cordially, Columbo

On Feb 4, 3:01*pm, ChessFire wrote:

Cordially, Columbo

More like Inspector Clouseau:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rolfj5MMBbA

On Feb 4, 11:25*am, Taylor Kingston
wrote:
On Feb 4, 12:18*pm, The Historian wrote:

On Feb 4, 11:39*am, ChessFire wrote:

So... some time ago the thought was to go-fish, and by analysis
compare voluntary emotive expressions here, with the Anonymous
expressions of the FSS.

And the final determination is that anyone who argues with Phil Innes
MUST be the FSS! Brilliant!

* In that case, we have a situation like this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuifqpgpHe0

Actually this was the attitude towards pursuing the FSS. LOL!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVZHB...eature=related

On Feb 4, 4:12*pm, Rob wrote:
On Feb 4, 11:25*am, Taylor Kingston
wrote:

On Feb 4, 12:18*pm, The Historian wrote:

On Feb 4, 11:39*am, ChessFire wrote:

So... some time ago the thought was to go-fish, and by analysis
compare voluntary emotive expressions here, with the Anonymous
expressions of the FSS.

And the final determination is that anyone who argues with Phil Innes
MUST be the FSS! Brilliant!

* In that case, we have a situation like this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuifqpgpHe0

Actually this was the attitude towards pursuing the FSS. * *LOL!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVZHB...eature=related

We are beyond joking around now, and beyond juvenile references to
adult malice which actually injures the lives of real people involved
in chess. I think the data is sufficient to provoke further inquiry,
and let the chips lie where they may!

Certainly 2 conspiratorial groups operated here, but of that, perhaps
no more public mention, especially with the fishing trip arguments
with the pikes themselves. They have done well enough, and a major
human compunction is to revisit the scene of the crime, and often too,
to relive it for its last frisson — even though they didn't do aught
themselves, they celebrate the sick motives of others, since they have
been become coarse thereby in what they can get away with.

Certainly some will continue to trash others and everything without
making the slightest contribution to chess, we know who these people
are, but at least they now know that there has been analysis of their
efforts these past two years - not even a secret analysis, since I
wrote this then!. But naturally they will now want accusations and
proofs, with themselves as prosecutors judges and jury all together,
but as naturally they will trash real inquiry, as they have ever
done.

The game is changed, and any need to respond to evident malice is
removed entirely.

Phil Innes

On Feb 4, 4:29*pm, ChessFire wrote:

We are beyond joking around now, and beyond juvenile references to
adult malice which actually injures the lives of real people involved
in chess. I think the data is sufficient to provoke further inquiry,
and let the chips lie where they may!

Yes. We'd better get an omgoodsman to investigate.

On Feb 4, 4:47*pm, Taylor Kingston
wrote:
On Feb 4, 4:29*pm, ChessFire wrote:



We are beyond joking around now, and beyond juvenile references to
adult malice which actually injures the lives of real people involved
in chess. I think the data is sufficient to provoke further inquiry,
and let the chips lie where they may!

* Yes. We'd *better get an omgoodsman to investigate.

You have no idea who has been investigating what these past two years,
patzer, except you personally bite at every lure, which allows others
their spite. These are no longer conversational items, and since you
yourself 'cannot recall' your own activities to repress commercial
prospects of others

ROFL

even after I returned your e-mails to you at your request, you can't
'recall' even those

ROFL

and you recruited a team of like minds in private, I wonder that you
challenge anything at all? But let that be rhetorical, since I have
the evidence, no?



Again, these are no longer questions to you; since evidential material
over time is so much more compelling than current protest and spin,
and since you are such an obvious Hiss-teric, encouraging those who
follow such sweet nothings, you are likely stupid or culpable.

Please say as much more as you wish, but for gawd's sake say
something! Otherwise you are merely marked as a pedant nit-wit, and by
GMs who read your crap. You are likely not much suspect as the FSS,
since no-one at all could think you mere more than sly in the open.
The FSS was better than you at abuse, Kingston.

But it is all over now. You can relax since you are too obviously
stupid and hiss-terical to be the FSS — no personal control whatever,
though you encourage a sort of negativity here, eh?

ROFL

Your slip is showing, comrade.

ROFL

Do not 'translate' my message, it's as plain as day to anyone about
your own orientation, public and private, and why you whine.

Phil Innes