A Chess forum. ChessBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ChessBanter forum » Chess Newsgroups » rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Playing higher rated opponents

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old November 30th 16, 01:49 PM posted to rec.games.chess.misc
Anonymous Remailer (austria)
external usenet poster
Posts: 29
Default Playing higher rated opponents

Hash: SHA512

In article
The Horny Goat wrote:

On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 05:36:54 -0800 (PST), Eliyahu

On Friday, October 7, 2016 at 8:34:23 PM UTC+3, azigni wrote:
On Fri, 07 Oct 2016 03:52:05 +0200, Radrook wrote:
I think it is very unwise to play higher rated opponents.

I would like to add...it all depends on ones reasons for playing chess.
Not every chess player aspires to be be a world class player. Not every
chess player wishes to play someone who could beat them.


What I want, what every normal chess player wants, is WINNING!!

In order to achieve that goal, you can start learning very hard, read a lot of books, play higher rated players, and get your a.. kicked.

I prefer the shortcut, playing weaker players, and winning without effort.

But to each his own. Those who like to lose because they wanna get better in order to win, also have their place. If everybody did like me, I wouldn't have opponents anymore.

My daughter played for awhile but gave it up as I let her win
occasionally to keep up her spirit but she was good enough to know
when the punches were being pulled. This would have been roughly 1750
vs 1100. I tried to get into the rudiments of analysis but she figured
it was going to take far too long to get the broad points down.

Which given the size of my library (which I haven't put nearly enough
time to master so it's at least as much a collection as a compilation
of assimilated chess knowledge) that's a real shame since it's big
enough and of high enough quality that a properrly motivated junior
could easily make master strength with enough time.

Moral: mastery at chess is one heckuva lot more than an ability to
appreciate quality in chess books and buy them!

This has, unfortunately, been my experience as well. Oh, and
sleeping with a chess book under the pillow did NOT help.

Eugene Delmar's Ghost

Version: N/A

DVDrG8B/QuyCtUaf2VQfZg+5UFRs1dCHQXWIonigwdEvGct4r9fKdWlr6N NGiIio
ijeiyCci5ElILBKKvAEDjcP3mAgsvOgMoub6Al0AngMpTgrCUr v9nEeSuujFNa0p
COo8oHibfl42L89vEntb5OHU3vy0xDTenogYDQHIs3tUswr2Mc CIIGer2G6CpzRd


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My highest Elo scalp on Playchess for far: beat a player rated 516points higher than me. raylopez99 rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 8 August 18th 10 11:17 PM
First Draft: Blue Book Encyclopedia of Chess samsloan rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 9 February 29th 08 04:55 PM
Should the USCF rate the Olympiads? Sam Sloan rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 9 March 30th 06 12:52 AM
Should the USCF rate the Olympiads? Sam Sloan rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 9 March 30th 06 12:52 AM
Why is a woman rated 1663 playing for the US title? Ray Gordon rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 1 March 10th 06 03:31 PM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright 2004-2018 ChessBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.