![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: interesting, question, think |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Mhoulsby" -remove- wrote in message
... Thanks for the reference, I, too, was unsure which game it was (despite the fact that I know the game... D'Oh!) Mark Wow, my response to Dan Yobry propagated fast. The reply from Fred (1958) is also me, now I have synched the names in my newsgroup programs. Naturally this game has indelibly imprinted on my mind, so I expect everyone else to instantly recognize it too. Defintely my most memorable game. |
| Ads |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
FredH. wrote (13 Jul 2003 16:59:50 -0700):
Paul Morphy vs The Duke of Brunswick & Count Isouard, Paris Opera House, 1958 If you do a Google search on Paul Morphy Opera you will get lots of hits. _ 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 Bg4 4.dxe5 Bxf3 5.Qxf3 dxe5 6.Bc4 Nf6 7.Qb3 Qe7 8.Nc3 c6 9.Bg5 b5 10.Nxb5 cxb5 11.Bxb5+ Nbd7 12.O-O-O Rd8 13.Rxd7 Rxd7 14.Rd1 Qe6 15.Bxd7+ Nxd7 16.Qb8+ Nxb8 17 Rd8# |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dan Yobry" wrote in message ... Thanks! I am a little less clueless now. ![]() This is a fun game. Definitely not high calibur play, but it shows that Morphy knew exacly what he was doing. It's amazing because it seems as if he has this checkmate planned all the way back at 1.e4. All the moves come together at the end. Just beautiful. Thanks again! -Dan It was quite funny really. I could have played the entire game in under30 seconds, but I forced myself to use over 90 minutes on the clock. Thought long and hard before the first sacrifice. My opponent was very impressed, of course I accepted his praise with humility. LOL |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dan Yobry wrote:
Thanks! I am a little less clueless now. ![]() This is a fun game. Definitely not high calibur play, but it shows that Morphy knew exacly what he was doing. It's amazing because it seems as if he has this checkmate planned all the way back at 1.e4. All the moves come together at the end. Black missed several chances to improve. 9. .. h6 10. Bxf6 gxf6 would have been much better than 9. .. b5? Morphy had seen he would have recovered all his sacrificed material with Bxf6 and Rxd7 with extra pawns and a fantastic position, but 14. .. Qe6? (or your opponent's .. Qc5) allowed a quick(er) mate. After 14. .. h6 (what else?), Black dies a slower death. Still, it is a favorite for chess coaches. I've had the White side about three times in casual games. One didn't play .. b5 and another played 7.. Qd7. I played 8. Qxb7 since Qb4+ was no longer on the table, but 8. .. Qc6 9. Bb5 was. -Dan -- email me at danyobry(at)attbi.com "Dan Yobry" wrote in message ... What famous game would that be? Yes, I'm clueless. ![]() -Dan -- email me at danyobry(at)attbi.com "FredH." wrote in message om... "Tom E." wrote in message ... Has the same game ever been played twice? (unintentionally) I'm not talking about scholars mates here, but something like 20-30 moves past a 10 move main line opening of the French or something. Tom Well, this isn't quite what you asked for, but here is a game I had the good fortune of playing (honest!), as White of course, in a tournament game. It is oh so close to another "somewhat" famous game. Fred. [Event ""] [Site ""] [Date "1983"] [Round ""] [White "Fred"] [Black ""] [Result ""] [Eco "C41"] [Annotator ""] [Source ""] 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 Bg4 4.dxe5 Bxf3 5.Qxf3 dxe5 6.Bc4 Nf6 7.Qb3 Qe7 8.Nc3 c6 9.Bg5 b5 10.Nxb5 cxb5 11.Bxb5+ Nbd7 12.O-O-O Rd8 13.Rxd7 Rxd7 14.Rd1 Qc5 15.Bxd7+ Nxd7 16.Qb8+ * -- Warren Porter (remove digits to reply) |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ratings question; need input | Eric Mark | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 5 | July 15th 04 06:48 PM |
| Question on analysis | Ralph Jones | rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) | 4 | March 17th 04 06:46 PM |
| Puzzle solving: an urgent question | Samik | rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) | 4 | February 20th 04 09:25 PM |
| Question About Move Order 1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.e3 | edwood | rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) | 7 | October 3rd 03 02:08 AM |
| Chessbase Question | Mike Ogush | rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) | 0 | August 11th 03 10:23 PM |