"Nick" wrote in message
om...

Evidently, the jury concurred that the United States government behaved
worse
than Alex Sherzer did in this case.

Hardly evident. They judged that he couldn't be convicted due to a
technicality. Do the same rules apply in your utopia? More likely he would
have found himself within a burning tire.

"They had dead cats. I could smell them." - H. Finn

StanB

"StanB" writes:
Evidently, the jury concurred that the United States government
behaved worse than Alex Sherzer did in this case.

Hardly evident. They judged that he couldn't be convicted due to a
technicality. Do the same rules apply in your utopia? More likely he would
have found himself within a burning tire.

Entrapment is not a technicality. Once the jury decided Sherzer was
entrapped, it acquitted him as the law requires.

Dear Mr. Bourbaki,

Heil Dubya!

What makes you think that Dr. Sherzer behaved poorly in this case? From what
has been posted on this forum he seems to me to have acted like a normal adult
male.

He responded to a "personal" advertisement of some sort, including a photograph
(neither of which has been posted on this bbs) by a young(er) woman.

He and the advertiser developed an internet friendship, during which, I infer,
she began to ask him for advice concerning her life and he responded to such
requests.

Her mother -- whose efficacy as a loving parent may have been reflected most
accurately in the fact that the young woman had incurred an unwanted pregnancy
and had been incarcerated -- "found" a printout of something (we don't know
what) Dr. Sherzer and/or the young woman had communicated via email. The
mother, who appears to me to have held her daughter in utter contempt, involved
an agent of the government, who then took over the young woman's email. (We've
heard nothing of the young woman's postion regarding this and other
infringements of her human rights. No one has arrested the government agent or
the mother, despite the Federal and State laws against restricting the human
rights of others.)

Dr. Sherzer was entrapped by the government agent. (For all we know, there may
have been NO hint at all of a sexual encounter between Dr. Sherzer and the
young woman before the advent of the government agent.)

What, then, did Dr. Sherzer do to incur all this animosity? NOTHING. He was
32 years old and the young woman was almost 16 years old. I have a 74 year old
brother who has lived with a 40 year old woman for a decade. He was more than
twice her age when they started living together. So what? It is true that
Romeo was only 14 years old, but he ACTUALLY DID SEDUCE a 13-year-old girl.
(Dr. Sherzer was "seduced" by the government agent in the guise of the young
woman.) I doubt that any of those who have cursed and condemned and laughed at
Dr. Sherzer on this forum feel the same way about Romeo.

As has been pointed out here (by me, among others), the majority population of
the world considers the menses a legitimate sign of womanhood. NO ONE on this
forum has denied this. (The young woman had been pregnant, so I guess she may
have had one or more periods.)

Dr. Sherzer, from what we have seen on this bbs, has acted as a perfectly
normal and civil adult male, in a very sick society.

(If anyone knows how to contact him, please let Dr. Sherzer know my email
address and tell him that I have a son, Douglass, who is a board certified
internist and the medical director of a clinic in the Boston area -- a great
chess center -- who might be able to help to help him get a residency.)

(LeModernCaveman) wrote in message
...
Tony Dilucente wrote:
Actually, the most amazing thing is that a 32 year old man is not mature

enough or sensible enough to pursue relationships with women closer to
his
own age. Most likely, he is lacking in social skills and personality.

Nick wrote:
From what I have heard of him, Alex Sherzer has been involved in (at
least
attempted) relationships with "women closer to his own age". I seem to
recall having seen him with Zsofia Polgar some years ago.

Didn't one of the Polgar entourage talk glowingly about how Zsofia married
a doctor?

Sofia Polgar married GM Yona Kosashvili, a doctor, after her relationship
(whatever it was) with Alex Sherzer had ended.

Zsuzsa Polgar married Jacob Shutzman (from whom she's now seeking a divorce)
after her relationship with GM Julio Granda Zuniga had ended.

Tony Dilucente wrote:
However, the actions which precipitated his trial are perverse, whether
or
not he was found guilty in a court of law. Clearly, he is what one
would
characterize as a 'loser'.

Nick wrote:
I hope that Alex Sherzer already has 'learned his lesson' in this case.
And I hope that Alex Sherzer's entire future life and work will not be
mischaracterised only as a consequence of his misjudgments in this case.

I think the government's sins in this case were far worse than his.

Evidently, the jury concurred that the United States government behaved worse

than Alex Sherzer did in this case.

'Those who never have been guilty of any indiscretion are generally people
who have very little active virtue.'
--Frances Moore Brooke (The History of Emily Montague)

--Nick


Heute Uhmuhrikkka, Afghanistan, und Irak. Morgen die ganze Welt!

Uhmuhrikkka, Uhmuhrikkka uber alles!

(Was 11 September 2001 Kristalnacht or the date of the Reichstag fire?)

Fraternally,

Jerome Bibuld
gens una sumus

Heil Dubya!

Firstly, Larry Parr already has defined the Boozer's "technicality" correctly;
that "tecnicality" properly is called a jury.
Secondly, in the only place where I have read about "burning tires" being used
to execute humans, it was reserved for traitors to the people of South Africa.
But it is to be expected that the racist Boozer bacillus would misapply the
analogy.

"Nick" wrote in message
. com...

Evidently, the jury concurred that the United States government behaved
worse
than Alex Sherzer did in this case.

Hardly evident. They judged that he couldn't be convicted due to a
technicality. Do the same rules apply in your utopia? More likely he would
have found himself within a burning tire.

"They had dead cats. I could smell them." - H. Finn

StanB


Heute Uhmuhrikkka, Afghanistan und Irak. Morgen die ganze Welt!

Uhmuhrikkka, Uhmuhrikkka uber Alles!

(Was 11 September 2001 Kristalnacht or the date of the Reichstag fire?)

Fraternally,

Jerome Bibuld
gens una sumus

"StanB" wrote in message
...
"Nick" wrote in message
om...
(snipped)
Evidently, the jury concurred that the United States government behaved
worse than Alex Sherzer did in this case.

Hardly evident. They judged that he couldn't be convicted due to a
technicality.

Evidently, Stan Booz believes that entrapment is just a "technicality".

"If you're looking for a personal recommendation to support your admission to
law school, you will want to ask somebody beside me. You're demonstrably not
bright enough."
--Steve Grant (to Kenneth C.)

Do the same rules apply in your utopia? More likely he would have found
himself within a burning tire.

Given his record of racist rhetoric here, perhaps Stan Booz would have felt
better if Alex Sherzer's jury had been one of StanB's presumed favourite
Alabama "all-white juries", with their historical reputation for universal
fairness (sarcasm intended).

Notwithstanding the depressing state of USCF business, Stan Booz seems to have
nothing much better to do with his time than to continue his ad hominem attacks
on someone with no connection to USCF business or politics. Or might Stan Booz
be auditioning to replace Rush Limbaugh (a popular extreme right-wing political
talk show host on American radio) as a professional NFL football commentator?

Here's a link to my post in the thread, "Tim Hanke's Cultural Prejudice",
wherein I cite evidence to prove directly that Stan Booz has *lied* about me:

http://makeashorterlink.com/?V27416E75

"They had dead cats. I could smell them." - H. Finn
StanB

"Stan, the man (or not)! You always have something so nice and positive to say!
Better be careful or you might not make it to Heaven! God don't like ugly!
Stop hating!!!"
--Debi Sherry (to Stan Booz, 7 September 2003, "Susan Polgar")

"He was a falsehood done in flesh and blood."
--Mark Twain (The Gilded Age)

--Nick

"Nick" wrote in message
om...

Evidently, the jury concurred that the United States government behaved
worse than Alex Sherzer did in this case.

Hardly evident. They judged that he couldn't be convicted due to a
technicality.

Evidently, Stan Booz believes that entrapment is just a "technicality".

Evidently, you think entrapment is worse behavior than a grown man intending
to fornicate with a fifteen year old child.

"They had dead cats. I could smell them." - H. Finn

StanB

"StanB" wrote in message
...
"Nick" wrote in message
om...
Evidently, the jury concurred that the United States government behaved
worse than Alex Sherzer did in this case.

StanB wrote:
Hardly evident. They judged that he couldn't be convicted due to a
technicality.

Nick wrote:
Evidently, Stan Booz believes that entrapment is just a "technicality".

Evidently, you think entrapment is worse behavior than a grown man
intending to fornicate with a fifteen year old child.

Has Stan Booz read my posts about the relationship between Will and Ariel
Durant (once his student), who were married when she was fifteen years old?

As a matter of public policy, the consequences of allowing such unprincipled
government entrapments are more dangerous to society and individual liberties
than any consequences likely would have been if Alex Sherzer had been able to
consummate his tryst with an almost sixteen-year-old female (Should she really
be characterised as a 'child', a 'girl', a 'young lady', or a 'woman'?).

Would Stan Booz care to comment on the behaviour of the many American soldiers
who have fornicated with (or simply raped) girls of age fifteen (or younger)
during the United States's wars in Asia?

'He was exceedingly distrustful, as ignorance usually was.'
--Charles Dickens (Bleak House)

--Nick

"Nick" wrote in message
om...

Would Stan Booz care to comment on the behaviour of the many American
soldiers
who have fornicated with (or simply raped) girls of age fifteen (or
younger)
during the United States's wars in Asia?

Sure. "Two wrongs don't make a right" --A. Cliché

StanB

"StanB" writes:
Evidently, you think entrapment is worse behavior than a grown man intending
to fornicate with a fifteen year old child.

Correction, he intended to boff a fictitious 15yo who was actually
concocted by the imagination of a depraved, fully grown FBI agent
experienced in manipulating other people's fantasies. You can be sure
that the fictitious 15yo was hardly a flower of innocence.

"Paul Rubin" wrote in message
...

"StanB" writes:
Evidently, you think entrapment is worse behavior than a grown man
intending
to fornicate with a fifteen year old child.

Correction, he intended to boff a fictitious 15yo who was actually
concocted by the imagination of a depraved, fully grown FBI agent
experienced in manipulating other people's fantasies. You can be sure
that the fictitious 15yo was hardly a flower of innocence.

None of what you say justifies or changes the despicable intent of the trip
to Alley Bammy.

StanB