A Chess forum. ChessBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ChessBanter forum » Chess Newsgroups » rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: ,

Dazed and Confused



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 6th 03, 02:52 AM
Nick
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Dazed and Confused

(Liam Too) wrote in message
. com...
I know him as NickBourbaki2.
I was able to corner him into saying that Bobby Fischer is crazy,
but of course, he was able to deny it and twisted it around by posting
more than a couple of gigazillion lines of goobledygook.


Lance Smith has just reiterated his *false statement*, which Louis Blair
and I have already addressed. (Also, Lance Smith does not know how to count.)

In the thread, "The Great Annotated Empty Moving Boxes Robbery"
(13 September 2003), Lance Smith wrote to Louis Blair:
"...Then you and Nick called Fischer crazy."

In that same thread (13 September 2003) Louis Blair wrote to Lance Smith:
"That last statement is false."

Here's a link to my response to Lance Smith in that thread (13 September 2003):

http://makeashorterlink.com/?I2C22IDF5

Lance Smith has provided *no evidence* that Louis Blair or I called Bobby
Fischer "crazy", which is Lance Smith's specific term. I did concur with
Robert Musicant that "Bobby Fischer today probably has a serious personality
disturbance".

Robert Musicant was closely following the discussions in that thread, and so
he should be well-qualified to corroborate whether or not Louis Blair or I
have ever called Fischer "crazy", as Lance Smith keeps alleging.

Here's a link to my response to another dishonest attack by Lance Smith,
wherein he distorted my statement by snipping its first half in order to
attack its second half out of context:

http://makeashorterlink.com/?N28225DF5

Only a troll would continue knowingly reiterating false statements.

I totally agree, NickBourbaki2 is not the sharpest tool in the pen box.
Lance Smith


'How wondrous familiar is a fool.'
--Herman Melville (Moby Dick)

It's hardly surprising to me that nearly illiterate trolls such as Greg Kennedy
("NoMoreChess") and Lance Smith ("Liam Too") should agree on whom they detest.

Here's a link to Lance Smith's post to me about Bobby Fischer:

http://makeashorterlink.com/?O10321DF5

"Then Bobby Fischer is a very normal politician."
--Lance Smith (9 September 2003)

Given Bobby Fischer's public statements about the attacks of 11 September 2001,
how would Lance Smith care to explain his profound insight that "Bobby Fischer
is a very normal politician"? I might not be 'sharp' enough to understand.

'One must be somewhat hated to be independent of folly.'
--Henry Mackenzie (Julia de Roubigne)

--Nick
Ads
  #2  
Old October 6th 03, 03:11 AM
Parrthenon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Dazed and Confused

MR. NOMORECHESS

By Larry Parr

A word for Nick Bourbaki: Nomorechess is Greg Kennedy. The "style,"
if that is quite the word, is inimitable. Right down to the grammatical and
spelling mistakes.

Years ago Mr. Kennedy used to talk about finding a spellchecker that
would empower him. He never did. The malapropisms are ever present, and at
this late date, one guesses they always will be.

Mr. Kennedy and a few such as he have taken up false e-mail addresses,
and their criticism of this writer is that I fail to guess who's who. There was
a lot of resentment from our Nomorechess when I twigged his identity almost
immediately.


  #3  
Old October 6th 03, 06:37 AM
Parrthenon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Dazed and Confused

KENNEDY'S STRANGE FIXATION

By Larry Parr

Greg Kennedy has been incensed that this writer and others realized so quickly
that he was behind the anonymouse address of Nomorechess. The combination of
guttersnipe spite, malapropisms, basic errors of usage and attempts to sound
like this writer gave him away

A longtime Kennedy practice has been to hit this writer for failing to guess
correctly who sits behind other false names. A strange criticism, to say the
least.

  #4  
Old October 6th 03, 07:45 AM
Nick
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Dazed and Confused

This post corrects an important link in my previous post.

(Nick) wrote in message om...
(Liam Too) wrote in message
. com...
I know him as NickBourbaki2.
I was able to corner him into saying that Bobby Fischer is crazy,
but of course, he was able to deny it and twisted it around by posting
more than a couple of gigazillion lines of goobledygook.


Lance Smith has just reiterated his *false statement*, which Louis Blair
and I have already addressed. (Also, Lance Smith does not know how to count.)

In the thread, "The Great Annotated Empty Moving Boxes Robbery"
(13 September 2003), Lance Smith wrote to Louis Blair:
"...Then you and Nick called Fischer crazy."

In that same thread (13 September 2003) Louis Blair wrote to Lance Smith:
"That last statement is false."


Here's a (corrected, I hope) link to my response to Lance Smith in that thread
(13 September 2003):

http://makeashorterlink.com/?I2C221DF5

Lance Smith has provided *no evidence* that Louis Blair or I called Bobby
Fischer "crazy", which is Lance Smith's specific term. I did concur with
Robert Musicant that "Bobby Fischer today probably has a serious personality
disturbance".

Robert Musicant was closely following the discussions in that thread, and so
he should be well-qualified to corroborate whether or not Louis Blair or I
have ever called Fischer "crazy", as Lance Smith keeps alleging.

Here's a link to my response to another dishonest attack by Lance Smith,
wherein he distorted my statement by snipping its first half in order to
attack its second half out of context:

http://makeashorterlink.com/?N28225DF5

Only a troll would continue knowingly reiterating false statements.

I totally agree, NickBourbaki2 is not the sharpest tool in the pen box.
Lance Smith


'How wondrous familiar is a fool.'
--Herman Melville (Moby Dick)

It's hardly surprising to me that nearly illiterate trolls such as Greg
Kennedy ("NoMoreChess") and Lance Smith ("Liam Too") should agree on whom
they detest.

Here's a link to Lance Smith's post to me about Bobby Fischer:

http://makeashorterlink.com/?O10321DF5

"Then Bobby Fischer is a very normal politician."
--Lance Smith (9 September 2003)

Given Bobby Fischer's public statements about the attacks of
11 September 2001, how would Lance Smith care to explain his
profound insight that "Bobby Fischer is a very normal politician"?
I might not be 'sharp' enough to understand.

'One must be somewhat hated to be independent of folly.'
--Henry Mackenzie (Julia de Roubigne)

--Nick

  #5  
Old October 6th 03, 02:56 PM
StanB
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Dazed and Confused

"They had dead cats. I could smell them." -- H. Finn

StanB

"Nick" wrote in message
om...
This post corrects an important link in my previous post.

(Nick) wrote in message

om...
(Liam Too) wrote in message
. com...
I know him as NickBourbaki2.
I was able to corner him into saying that Bobby Fischer is crazy,
but of course, he was able to deny it and twisted it around by posting
more than a couple of gigazillion lines of goobledygook.


Lance Smith has just reiterated his *false statement*, which Louis Blair
and I have already addressed. (Also, Lance Smith does not know how to

count.)

In the thread, "The Great Annotated Empty Moving Boxes Robbery"
(13 September 2003), Lance Smith wrote to Louis Blair:
"...Then you and Nick called Fischer crazy."

In that same thread (13 September 2003) Louis Blair wrote to Lance

Smith:
"That last statement is false."


Here's a (corrected, I hope) link to my response to Lance Smith in that

thread
(13 September 2003):

http://makeashorterlink.com/?I2C221DF5

Lance Smith has provided *no evidence* that Louis Blair or I called

Bobby
Fischer "crazy", which is Lance Smith's specific term. I did concur

with
Robert Musicant that "Bobby Fischer today probably has a serious

personality
disturbance".

Robert Musicant was closely following the discussions in that thread,

and so
he should be well-qualified to corroborate whether or not Louis Blair or

I
have ever called Fischer "crazy", as Lance Smith keeps alleging.

Here's a link to my response to another dishonest attack by Lance Smith,
wherein he distorted my statement by snipping its first half in order to
attack its second half out of context:

http://makeashorterlink.com/?N28225DF5

Only a troll would continue knowingly reiterating false statements.

I totally agree, NickBourbaki2 is not the sharpest tool in the pen

box.
Lance Smith


'How wondrous familiar is a fool.'
--Herman Melville (Moby Dick)

It's hardly surprising to me that nearly illiterate trolls such as Greg
Kennedy ("NoMoreChess") and Lance Smith ("Liam Too") should agree on

whom
they detest.

Here's a link to Lance Smith's post to me about Bobby Fischer:

http://makeashorterlink.com/?O10321DF5

"Then Bobby Fischer is a very normal politician."
--Lance Smith (9 September 2003)

Given Bobby Fischer's public statements about the attacks of
11 September 2001, how would Lance Smith care to explain his
profound insight that "Bobby Fischer is a very normal politician"?
I might not be 'sharp' enough to understand.

'One must be somewhat hated to be independent of folly.'
--Henry Mackenzie (Julia de Roubigne)

--Nick



  #6  
Old October 7th 03, 06:43 AM
NoMoreChess
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Dazed and Confused

..
I for one have yet to see ANY poster who "sounds like" Larry Parr. No other
poster I know of places a "title" or heading at the top of each of their posts,
like they are writing an article for some magazine.

Additionally, precious few other posters go so far out of their way to use
very uncommon words.
A recent study determined that such writers are, opposite to what they no
doubt expect and hope for, judged LESS intelligent when they use such words,
possibly because they are not as well understood by readers.


and attempts to sound like this writer gave him away



Trust me on this one, Mr. Parr: nobody here is trying to "sound like" you.
Why would they want to?

I think I posted one off-the-cuff parody in which I attempted to "anticipate"
Larry Parr's next vehement personal attack on another poster here, but had I
really wanted to "sound like" Larry Parr, I would have done some research
first. I needed to toss in a few obscure words, and several references to
Russian history. Oh yes, and a slap at Stalin!




A longtime Kennedy practice has been to hit this writer for failing to guess
correctly who sits behind other false names.



I never attempted to take credit for exposing *all* of Mr. Parr's bungling.
Render unto Caesar....
My list so far includes just two of Mr. Parr's erroneous attempts, which not
only backfired, but revealed that Mr. Parr has a serious problem with "ghosts,"
or paranoia.

I think I saw yet another misidentification by Larry Parr last night, but I
myself am not yet certain just who was who. Does anyone here remember the Dr.
Graue/Rolf Tueschen confusion? How many identities did Mr. Tueschen turn out
to have had? Was not one of the identities which Mr. Parr quite confidently
attributted to Mr. Tueschen, actually that of a young boy named Sean Evans?
What sort of "genius" cannot differentiate between the ravings of an old man,
and the scribblings of a mere child? Perhaps the answer lies somewhere near
the Paranoid Delusion islands -- just north of Borneo.









  #7  
Old October 7th 03, 06:47 AM
Parrthenon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Dazed and Confused

"I AM HIM"

By Larry Parr

"I am him" -- a typical Greg Kennedy barbarism.

If Mr. Kennedy wishes to see the kind of error that allowed us to twig
within a few postings that he is Nomorechess, he can consult his effort below.

It's "I am HE," Mr. Kennedy. It's "I am HE."

"He" is what grammarians call a predicate nominative.

  #8  
Old October 7th 03, 07:05 AM
NoMoreChess
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Dazed and Confused

..

"They had dead cats. I could smell them." -- H. Finn



Not only do these clowns have "dead cats" and smell just awful, but one of
them went 'round calling *everyone* he didn't like, names. And it goes without
saying that he mainly liked himself!

Like an echo, Mark Baloney repeats the mantra of his lord and master: Trolls!
Liars! Fools! Well, okay, the Baloney man refrains from that last one --
probably a confounded Christian, in the servitude of a heathen. :-)




I don't recall in which book Huck made that remark about dead cats, but
these two clowns remind me instead of the luny duo which ended up getting
tarred and feathered in Huckleberry Finn, after first pulling the wool over a
lot of townspeople's eyes, and making off with their money.







  #9  
Old October 9th 03, 03:27 AM
Nick
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Dazed and Confused

(Liam Too) wrote in message
om...
(Nick) wrote in message
om...
It's hardly surprising to me that nearly illiterate trolls such as
Greg Kennedy ("NoMoreChess") and Lance Smith ("Liam Too") should agree
on whom they detest.


This is how you respond to intelligent debates, by calling me an illiterate
troll?


1) I wrote that Lance Smith is a "nearly illiterate troll".
2) Lance Smith has been trolling me, not engaging in an "intelligent debate".
3) I doubt that Lance Smith is capable of engaging in an "intelligent debate".

http://makeashorterlink.com/?O10321DF5

"Then Bobby Fischer is a very normal politician."
--Lance Smith (9 September 2003)

I will NOT stoop down to your level though and resort to name calling
and personal attacks as you did above.


Instead, Lance Smith prefers to make his personal attacks against me by
reiterating false statements about me that already have been confuted by
Louis Blair, Mark Houlsby, or me.

You have been posting in RGCM that you do not go to RGCP to browse and
respond to the ones that are being posted there. Well, as you can see,
those statements were NOT true.


Those statements were all true at the time that they were written.

1) Suppose that today I were to write that I am unmarried and
I have no plans to be married.
2) Suppose that tomorrow I were to meet 'Miss Right' (for me).
3) Suppose that she and I were to get married.

Would you like me to elborate further?


Then would Lance Smith conclude that my first statement was not true?

"Folly does not amuse, or even employ one's notice long."
--John Cleland (Memoirs of a Coxcomb)

--Nick
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dazed and Confused NoMoreChess rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 42 October 12th 03 07:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 ChessBanter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Free Ringtones - MP3 Players - Gardening - Loans - Loans