![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: champion, chess, was, weakest, womens, world |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Peter, Ms. Polgar is showing class and charity. She's in a much better position to judge him in that light than we are. Let the Fischer nonsense go. Angelo "Peter van der Hoog" wrote in message news ![]() "GM Susan Polgar" wrote in message om... Dear Susan, Would you really still want to play chess against Fischer, despite all the things he said in the radio-interviews? I wonder who is more remarkable, you or Fischer! "If I ever decide to do any project relating to Bobby, I would want his consent". Either you have a very special contact with Fischer or this is very naiv. Only a few persons, who spoke publicly about their friendship with Fischer still have contact with him. I can only think of Benko and Leko. Perhaps he has a special contact with Hungarians. Do you think Fischer knew his father came from Hungary? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- I have great respect for Bobby's chess skills and I wish him the best with his life as well as being a Dad. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- What do you think, should Fischer teach Jinky Ong chess? In my opinion he'd better teaches his daughter Go. Then she really has a change to become world champion. Within the first 300 on the international Go-rating list you already find 15 women. The highest ranked woman (after Judit) on the chess-rating list is Stefanova Antoaneta on 601. Isn't that worrying? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- He was very nice to me and my family. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Those three lovely girls softened his heart :-) Best regards, Peter van der Hoog |
| Ads |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Angelo DePalma" wrote in message ...
Peter, Ms. Polgar is showing class and charity. She's in a much better position to judge him in that light than we are. Let the Fischer nonsense go. Angelo Angelo, I have the highest respect for Ms. Polgar but I also have a great interest in Bobby Fischer. Since she is in a better situation to judge him, I ask her questions and she is perfectly free to answer those questions. I'm sure she does not need knight Angelo DePalma, galloping on his horse, to come to her rescue. Peter |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am amazed she responded to you. It shows she has a warm heart indeed. If people like this are on Sherzer's side then Sherzer couldn't have been the monster he was portrayed to be. Yeah he screwed up royally but you know who your friends are at times like this. His " true " friends didn't abandon him. EZoto |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
"GM Susan Polgar" wrote in message om... Dear Susan, --------------------------------------------------------- I am more proud of making positive impacts for the game and be a great role model for young children (especially girls) than winning chess titles. That is why my friends and I are working very hard to change the industry for the better. As my business manager has stated many times before, chess in America will change dramatically for the better in 2004. I am quite confident of that. --------------------------------------------------------- I wish you lots of success. I have never listened to Bobby's interviews on the radio. That explains a lot. We are chess players. This is a chess forum. Then here is a chess-related question: Why is there such an enormous gap between Judit and the next woman on the chess-rating list? Is Judit so special? Best regards, Peter |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well said
We did not abandon Alex. His friends may scream at himbehind closed door but we support him. Some very important things that we treasu Trust, Loyalty, Integrity and Honesty, etc. Unfortunately, we see many people sold their souls for personal and political gains in our chess community. People like Susan is one in a million. Hope you and your family are doing well. Best Regards, Paul EZoto wrote in message ws.com... I am amazed she responded to you. It shows she has a warm heart indeed. If people like this are on Sherzer's side then Sherzer couldn't have been the monster he was portrayed to be. Yeah he screwed up royally but you know who your friends are at times like this. His " true " friends didn't abandon him. EZoto |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Judit is very special. She is one of the hardest worker in chess. It
is not easy to train day in day out for 20-25 years. Talent alone without hard work won't do it. She sacrificed a lot to get to where she is right now and I am very proud of her. Family support is also very important. Best wishes, GM Susan Polgar www.SusanPolgar.com www.USScholasticChess.org "Peter van der Hoog" wrote in message m... "GM Susan Polgar" wrote in message om... Dear Susan, --------------------------------------------------------- I am more proud of making positive impacts for the game and be a great role model for young children (especially girls) than winning chess titles. That is why my friends and I are working very hard to change the industry for the better. As my business manager has stated many times before, chess in America will change dramatically for the better in 2004. I am quite confident of that. --------------------------------------------------------- I wish you lots of success. I have never listened to Bobby's interviews on the radio. That explains a lot. We are chess players. This is a chess forum. Then here is a chess-related question: Why is there such an enormous gap between Judit and the next woman on the chess-rating list? Is Judit so special? Best regards, Peter |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
says... Judit is very special. She is one of the hardest worker in chess. It is not easy to train day in day out for 20-25 years. Talent alone without hard work won't do it. She sacrificed a lot to get to where she is right now and I am very proud of her. Family support is also very important. Best wishes, GM Susan Polgar www.SusanPolgar.com www.USScholasticChess.org This is all well and good. But how do you explain the lone rising star of Kateryna Lahno? Why ONLY someone of her caliber is able to reach as far as she could? She is the only other woman I can think of that can be considered another Judit Polgar. But this is because she makes it a point to avoid playing women only tournaments. Is there something to be learned by this? Or is there still a reason why women chess tournaments still exist? I'm all for bringing up the quality of women playing chess but something has to be done to speed up the process. If I was in Kirsan's shoes I'd make the bold suggestion to bring the best women chess players to compete alongside the usual contestants for the World Championship. Players like Alisa Maric, Galliamova, Skripchenko, Paehtz and Kosteniuk should have the same chance to fight for the World Chess championship title. Even you, GM Susan Polgar could win the World championship under such a rule change. But even if none of the contestants I mentioned win...at least their inclusion in the FIDE world championship cycles would open the door more widely for women players and give them the inspiration to play against the men more. This would help narrow the gap between men and women much faster. snipped |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Already discussed this in my ChessCafe.com column
Last year, HumpyKoneru was replacing Judit. This year, it is Lahno. Next year, there will be talk of someone else. I have heard this for 30 years. Many women reached 2400-2500 level. The question is will they have the support or intensity to reach the next level? Will there be any motivation for them to do so? When was the last time the Women's World Championship held? There are many things that can be done, but who is going to do it? USCF? FIDE? With what money and whose money? For every issue that was brought up here, there are 10-20-30 different opinions. No good promoter can survive the chess politicians. In the mean time, stay tune for 2004 ![]() Best wishes, GM Susan Polgar www.SusanPolgar.com www.USScholasticChess.org Alberich wrote in message ... In article , says... Judit is very special. She is one of the hardest worker in chess. It is not easy to train day in day out for 20-25 years. Talent alone without hard work won't do it. She sacrificed a lot to get to where she is right now and I am very proud of her. Family support is also very important. Best wishes, GM Susan Polgar www.SusanPolgar.com www.USScholasticChess.org This is all well and good. But how do you explain the lone rising star of Kateryna Lahno? Why ONLY someone of her caliber is able to reach as far as she could? She is the only other woman I can think of that can be considered another Judit Polgar. But this is because she makes it a point to avoid playing women only tournaments. Is there something to be learned by this? Or is there still a reason why women chess tournaments still exist? I'm all for bringing up the quality of women playing chess but something has to be done to speed up the process. If I was in Kirsan's shoes I'd make the bold suggestion to bring the best women chess players to compete alongside the usual contestants for the World Championship. Players like Alisa Maric, Galliamova, Skripchenko, Paehtz and Kosteniuk should have the same chance to fight for the World Chess championship title. Even you, GM Susan Polgar could win the World championship under such a rule change. But even if none of the contestants I mentioned win...at least their inclusion in the FIDE world championship cycles would open the door more widely for women players and give them the inspiration to play against the men more. This would help narrow the gap between men and women much faster. snipped |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
You seem to be suggesting the situation is hopeless. No matter how
talented the women players are, there doesn't seem to be an end to the obstacles they have to traverse in order to be taken seriously. Even when your sister Judit Polgar finally beat Gary Kasparov recently, it was pointed out the game was only rapid time controls. And with all due respect GM Susan Polgar, I think your sister has to do more. She's been an exemplary example of how a chess player should conduct herself in the public arena. She's thoughtful, engaging and intelligent. But unfortunately (and this is just my opinion),I believe Judit Polgar doesn't know how to play the "political game" of chess. Granted, it's possible she has no desire to muddy her hands in the dirty political backwaters in the chess world. But for the sake of women chess players, I believe Judit has to do more. She must take a stand against FIDE and force it to wake up. She doesn't have to do this alone. She has family like yourself to help her. But for goodness sake, GM Susan Polgar...this situation with women chess players lagging behind the men has to stop. The "nerdiness' charge alone about the game would go away if your sister would take up the sad, but necessary step of publicity for the game's sake. The wonders it would do for the chess world if Judit Polgar were interviewed by Katie Couric is priceless. And I've always wondered why Judit Polgar HASN'T been interviewed by Katie Couric. I can't imagine why it SHOULDN'T happen. Especially now. With all the backstabbing going on due to the controversies of Ponomariov, Kramnik-Leko and Kasparov is enough to make anyone throw up their hands in disgust. But your sister can put an end to that. Her recent match with Anand should have been televised live on ESPN. That would have done wonders for chess. I don't understand why it wasn't. At least that match wouldn't have made people fall asleep like it did for me during the Kasparov Deep Junior match. But what do we get instead? A mind numbing 17 hours coverage of Kasparov against Deep Fritz in 3D! You think people starting to get interested in chess will be at all impressed with this game if the time control is 40 moves in 2 hours per game?! That amounts to over 4 hours of staring at the computer screen or television! Correct me if I'm wrong here GM Susan Polgar, but your sister played Anand in the 8 game blitz match in Mainz at 25 minutes per side. That's 50 minutes per game. Far more appealing for TV advertisers and sponsors. In sum...FIDE is not going to go out of its way to modernize the way chess gets presented to the world. It's going to take someone like yourself and your sister to rouse FIDE from its slumber. Otherwise women chess players will never be taken seriously and may never get the chance to compete fairly for the world chess championship. In article , says... Already discussed this in my ChessCafe.com column Last year, HumpyKoneru was replacing Judit. This year, it is Lahno. Next year, there will be talk of someone else. I have heard this for 30 years. Many women reached 2400-2500 level. The question is will they have the support or intensity to reach the next level? Will there be any motivation for them to do so? When was the last time the Women's World Championship held? There are many things that can be done, but who is going to do it? USCF? FIDE? With what money and whose money? For every issue that was brought up here, there are 10-20-30 different opinions. No good promoter can survive the chess politicians. In the mean time, stay tune for 2004 ![]() Best wishes, GM Susan Polgar www.SusanPolgar.com www.USScholasticChess.org Alberich wrote in message ... In article , says... Judit is very special. She is one of the hardest worker in chess. It is not easy to train day in day out for 20-25 years. Talent alone without hard work won't do it. She sacrificed a lot to get to where she is right now and I am very proud of her. Family support is also very important. Best wishes, GM Susan Polgar www.SusanPolgar.com www.USScholasticChess.org This is all well and good. But how do you explain the lone rising star of Kateryna Lahno? Why ONLY someone of her caliber is able to reach as far as she could? She is the only other woman I can think of that can be considered another Judit Polgar. But this is because she makes it a point to avoid playing women only tournaments. Is there something to be learned by this? Or is there still a reason why women chess tournaments still exist? I'm all for bringing up the quality of women playing chess but something has to be done to speed up the process. If I was in Kirsan's shoes I'd make the bold suggestion to bring the best women chess players to compete alongside the usual contestants for the World Championship. Players like Alisa Maric, Galliamova, Skripchenko, Paehtz and Kosteniuk should have the same chance to fight for the World Chess championship title. Even you, GM Susan Polgar could win the World championship under such a rule change. But even if none of the contestants I mentioned win...at least their inclusion in the FIDE world championship cycles would open the door more widely for women players and give them the inspiration to play against the men more. This would help narrow the gap between men and women much faster. snipped |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| USCF Catalogue Remainers | ASCACHESS | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 2 | May 13th 04 08:46 AM |