![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: experiences, rubinsteins, wartime |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I've read countless times that Rubinstein's experiences during the World War
I left him with bad nerves and psychological problems for the rest of his life, but I've never read anything specific. Has anyone ever come across any details about what sort of things happened to him during the war? If so, can you tell me in which book? |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bob Lablaw wrote:
I've read countless times that Rubinstein's experiences during the World War I left him with bad nerves and psychological problems for the rest of his life, but I've never read anything specific. Has anyone ever come across any details about what sort of things happened to him during the war? If so, can you tell me in which book? Dear Mr. Lablaw, I can't help you with what happened specifically; what I can do is give you an indication of the sort of things that occurred on the Eastern Front during the Great War and the Russian Civil War. Please accept my apologies if what I write is already known to you, there may others who are less aware. In what follows I have kept the names of the towns unchanged; thus it may be useful to bear in mind that Lemberg is Lwow is Lvov, more obviously Vilnius is Vilna is Wilno, and so on. I shall be slovenly in not distinguishing the Russian, Polish, Lithuanian, ... territories; suffice it to note that they were forever changing. From page 28 of "The Saving Remnant" by Herbert Agar: 'In the autumn of 1914, when the Russians occupied Lemberg, in Galicia, a journalist described the plight of the Jews: "I saw dens of naked starving people," he wrote- "people driven insane by what they had experienced." 'But there were two differences: first, even to the enemy the non-Jews had certain faint rights pertaining to them as human beings. The Jews had no rights, once war had let slip the beast that inhabits all men. Both armies robbed and murdered the Jews, seemingly as a release from nervous tension. The fact that hundreds of thousands of Jews served bravely in both armies made no difference. Second, the non-Jews at the start of the war, were not so precariously low on the ladder. ... Many of them lived on the land, where Jews were not permitted.' Continuing to page 31: 'Southwards from the German zone, however, on the border of the Russian and the Austro-Hungarian Empires, the troubles of the Jews were still more acute .... Six times the Russians invaded Galicia and Bukovina, and six times they retreated. 'Descending the ladder of horrors, we find that the worst doom of all was that of the Jews in unoccupied Russia- in the part of the Pale that the Germans never reached. The Pale itself was abolished, for all practical purposes, by 1916, so that the Jews could be got out of the way. Half a million were deported by the Russian army at the beginning of the war, under conditions which recall the German death trains of 1942-45. They were not, however, sent to be murdered, but merely to starve inconspicuously in some place where they were no trouble to the soldiers.' From page 32: 'Then came the two revolutions. After a period of high hope these proved to be the greatest calamities ever to have befallen the Jews of Eastern Europe.' From page 35: 'A week after the armistice of November 1918 the Jews of Lemberg were overwhelmed by a pogrom. This was the capital of Galicia, where all had suffered grievously for four years. Yet as soon as the shooting stopped the Jewish quarter was almost completely destroyed by its surviving neighbours.' From page 39: 'To suggest the extent of the ruin: in many parts of Lithunia, whence the Russians had deported the Jews in 1915-16, whole streets of Jewish houses had disappeared totally, leaving no trace behind... Jews who survived the war and returned "home" sometimes found that the land on which their houses once stood had been ploughed and transformed into somebody's vegetable patch.' Also on page 39, pertaining to the Russo-Polish War: 'The whole of this useless war- in Poland, the Ukraine and the edges of Lithunia- was fought through, and over, the centres of Jewish population. Hated ferociously by both sides, the Orthodox life of the shtetl might have been exterminated on the spot, without having to wait for Hitler, had it not been for the agents of the Joint.' From page 45: 'By the end of 1921, after seven years of repeated attacks on their spiritual and bodily wellbeing- and after the resuscitation of such physical assets as schools, hospitals, bathhouses, synagogues, and credit facilities- the Jews of Poland need most of all a long term project for building the health of child and adult alike. Tuberculosis, favus and trachoma were epidemic. The decay had gone too far to be arrested by a mere succouring of the decrepit- and even that was too expensive for the resources of the local communities.' From page 49; 'So the grain was seized, either as a so-called tax or in return for so-called cash. And the Jews were blamed. Meanwhile, in the Ukraine, came the worst outbreak of pogroms since the seventeeth century- sheer malice on the part of anti-revolutionay forces. They raged from the end of the war until the end of 1919, and again during the Polish-Russian War.' From page 67: 'Here is an example of the troubles they had: in June 1919 Kolchak's troops evacuated Ekaterinburg, and the town was taken over by General Anenkoff, chief ataman of the region. His cossacks set briskly to work and killed some three thousand Jews. The British Consul at Ekaterinburg, an eye-witness, said the streets were "filled with Jewish blood".' By now you probably get the drift. One book I could suggest is "Red Victory" by Bruce Lincoln. Pages 317 to 324 of the Cardinal first paperback edition recount what happened to the Jewish populations inside the borders of Czarist Russia. There are many horrors recounted in that book, on page 384 is an example of what the Cheka did to "counter-revolutionaries": 'In Kiev, Chekists installed rats in pieces of pipe that had been closed at one end, placed the open end against prisoners' stomachs, and then heated the pipes until the rats, maddened by the heat, tried to escape by gnawing their way into the prisoners' intestines.' Regards, Simon. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dear Simon,
Thank you very much for taking the time to type up all the excerpts. I have to admit I had absolutely no knowledge of this aspect of the World War I. My knowledge of it was really restricted to the sorts of things that happened on the front. Bob |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
'The whole of this useless war- in Poland, the Ukraine and the edges of
Lithunia- was fought through, and over, the centres of Jewish population. Hated ferociously by both sides, the Orthodox life of the shtetl might have been exterminated on the spot, without having to wait for Hitler, had it not been for the agents of the Joint.' And Pilsudzki and Polish government giving Polish citizenship for escapees from Denikin hordes were just a footnote, of course. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
a.d.danilecki wrote:
'The whole of this useless war- in Poland, the Ukraine and the edges of Lithunia- was fought through, and over, the centres of Jewish population. Hated ferociously by both sides, the Orthodox life of the shtetl might have been exterminated on the spot, without having to wait for Hitler, had it not been for the agents of the Joint.' And Pilsudzki and Polish government giving Polish citizenship for escapees from Denikin hordes were just a footnote, of course. Dear Mr. Danilecki, I suspect that this quote from "The Saving Remnant", particularly the initial clause has irritated you, which is a matter of regret. The Battle of Warsaw, which may be what you have in the back of your mind, has sometimes been considered one of the decisive battles in history, given that this Polish victory successfully halted the Bolsheviks until the outbreak of WWII. These are emotional subjects which can make it difficult to retain the necessary detachment. This is one reason why I have largely stuck to quotes from existant books. Note that no ethnic grouping can be considered entirely blameless, what I did not mention in my previous post is that (from memory) seven out of ten Chekhists in Kiev were Jews; "Iron Feliks" head of the Cheka had a policy of sending Chekhists from hated minorities to various regions; thus Lithuanian Chekhists served in Russia, Armenian Chekhists in Georgia, and Jewish Chekhists in the Ukraine. I shall not cover Pilsudski's intentions in this post; what I will do here is is further expand upon Denikin, quoting from the previously cited "Red Victory." From page 322: 'Although Denikin himself never approved of pogroms, he spoke out against them with caution, for there was dissension enough in the White camp without taking its officers to task for their blatant anti-semitism, especially since he believed the masses had good reason to hate the Jews. Unwilling to punish officers whose paranoid delusions about the Jewish threat made them obsessed with seeking out and eradicating "Jew-Communists", Denikin allowed the pogroms to continue as the Whites searched frantically for common ground upon which to construct a social base for support for their regime among the bitterly anti-semitic people of the Ukraine. No longer spontaneous outpourings of racial and religious hatred, pogroms now became coldly calculated incidents of wholesale rape, extreme brutality, and unprecendented destruction. In a single day at the end of August in the Jewish settlement of Kremenchug, the Whites raped 350 women, including pregnant women, women who had just given birth, and even women who were dying. 'Then, as the Reds began to challenge the Volunteer Army more effectively from the north and east that fall, the pogroms turned into orgies of mass butchery. At the end of September, a five-day pogrom destroyed two hundred buildings and slaughtered nearly two thousand Jews in Fastov, a town that Baedeker had described before the Great War as "prettily situated" along the route of the Moscow-Kiev railroad. After the pogrom, the Jewish quarter of Fastov lay in utter ruins, its synagogue strewn with the bodies of murdered men, women, children, and old people. "The flourishing town of Fastov," the Kievan Echo reported, "has been transformed into a graveyard." A few days later, the Jews of Kiev suffered a similar fate. Inflamed by articles in Shulgin's Kievlianin and its companion in anti-semitism, Vechernie ogni (Evening Lights), Denikin's men threw defenceless Jews from the upper stories of buildings, killing others with bayonets and sabers, and drowned still others in the river.' Continuing on page 323; 'Certain that they faced extermination if the Whites remained, the Jews of the Ukraine turned to the Bolsheviks, who shot pogromists and outlawed anti-semitic writings. From time to time sporadic pogroms occurred in regions held by the Reds to be sure, but when compared with the tens of thousands of murders by the Whites, the few hundred pogrom deaths that Jews suffered in Bolshevik-held territory left few among them in doubt that Lenin's regime offered better chances of survival. It therefore was no accident that entire Jewish settlements began to follow Read Army units when they retreated rather than face the tender mercies of Denikin's soldiers.' Putting the thing crudely, under the Reds Jews merely faced economic ruin; under the Whites, they faced death, a quick one if they were lucky. A final point is that the people of today can in no wise be held responsible for the events of eighty years ago. Regards, Simon. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bob Lablaw wrote:
Dear Simon, Thank you very much for taking the time to type up all the excerpts. I have to admit I had absolutely no knowledge of this aspect of the World War I. My knowledge of it was really restricted to the sorts of things that happened on the front. Bob Dear Bob, Thank you for your kind remarks. To lighten the atmosphere a bit, I quote below a Moscow joke of that day which can be found towards the end of chapter one in the book Memoirs of a British Agent by R.H. Bruce Lockhart. 'In the winter of 1915 the Kaiser visited Lodz and with a view to placating the local population made a speech. His audience was, of course, mainly Jewish. As they listened to him, they heard him refer, first, to the Almighty and the All-Highest, then to God and himself, and finally to himself and God. When the speech was ended, the leading Jews withdrew into a corner to discuss the situation. '"This man will do for us," said the Chief Rabbi. "He's the first Christian I've met who denies the Holy Trinity."' Regards, Simon. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
chapman Billy wrote in message
...(to A.D. Danilecki): I suspect that this quote from "The Saving Remnant", particularly the initial clause has irritated you, which is a matter of regret. The Battle of Warsaw, which may be what you have in the back of your mind, has sometimes been considered one of the decisive battles in history, given that this Polish victory successfully halted the Bolsheviks until the outbreak of WWII. Dear Simon, Polish victory in the Battle of Warsaw has been attributed largely to disunity among the Red Army's leaders, particularly conflict between General Tukachevski and Stalin. (Eventually, Tukachevski was executed by Stalin.) Until 1939, Poland had large minorities of Belorussians, Ukrainians, and Germans. Putting the thing crudely, under the Reds Jews merely faced economic ruin; under the Whites, they faced death, a quick one if they were lucky. "Do you want to be more humanistic than Lenin, who ordered Dzerzhinsky to throw Savinkov out a window? Dzerzhinsky had for this job special people-- Letts who fulfilled this commission. Dzerzhinsky was no match for you, but he didn't shirk the dirty work. You work like waiters in white gloves. If you want to be Chekhists, take off your gloves. Chekist work--this is for peasants and not for barons." --Stalin (November 1952, as quoted by S.D. Ignatiev) "Boris Savinkov's whole life had been spent in conspiracy. Without religion as the Churches teach it; without morals as men prescribe them; without home or country; without wife or child, or kith or kin; without friend; without fear; hunter and hunted; implacable, unconquerable, alone. Yet he had found his consolation. His being was organised upon a theme. His life was devoted to a cause. That cause was the freedom of the Russian people. In that cause there was nothing he would not dare or endure. He had not even the stimulus of fanaticism. He was that extraordinary product--a Terrorist for moderate aims. A reasonable and enlightened policy--the Parliamentary system of England, the land tenure of France, freedom, toleration and goodwill--to be achieved whenever necessary by dynamite at the risk of death. No disguise could baffle his clear-cut perceptions. The forms of government might be revolutionised; the top might become the bottom and the bottom the top; the meaning of words, the association of ideas, the roles of individuals, the semblance of things might be changed out of all recognition without deceiving him. His instinct was sure; his course was unchanging. However winds might veer or currents shift, he always knew the port for which he was making; he always steered by the same star, and that star was red." --Winston Churchill (Great Contemporaries, p. 126) (Boris Savinkov, who was supported by the British SIS, was an important leader of the Whites during the Russian Civil War.) Here's a new book: "Stalin's Last Crime: The Plot Against the Jewish Doctors, 1948-1953" by Jonathan Brent and Vladimir Naumov (2003) "Stalin's Doctors' Plot came to worldwide attention in January 1953, two months before his death. It has been called 'the provocation of the century'; it has also been described as the irrational product of the aging dictator's diseased mind. Though Stalin died before he realized his intentions, the archival record allows us to reconstruct his purpose with some confidence.... The 'dyelo vrachey' (case of the doctors), as it was called by the Soviet government, was alleged at the time to be a widespread conspiracy in the Soviet medical profession organized by Jewish physicians against Kremlin leaders. A.A. Zhdanov was one victim; A.S. Scherbakov was another.... Jewish doctors were accused of either murdering these leaders or planning their murders in league with American intelligence and a corrupt Ministry of state security (MGB). Hundreds of doctors were arrested over a period of five months, beginning in October 1952 and ending in February 1953....After Stalin's death, in March 1953, the core group of thirty-seven doctors and their wives was released from prison. More releases followed in a general amnesty; apparent calm returned to daily life. Of the thirty-seven, only seventeen were Jews. Of the original group of six doctors accused of murdering A.A. Zhdanov in 1948, none was Jewish with the exception of the EKG technician, Sophia Karpai. This fact is one of the plot's deepest tangles. Today it is generally thought that the Doctors' Plot instead of being a conspiracy of doctors against the government was a conspiracy by the government against the Jewish doctors. The documents assembled in this book tell a different story. They show us that the 'case of the doctors' was actually a conspiracy of the government, in the person of Stalin, against itself. Had it succeeded, its rabid, anti-Semitic character would have had devastating consequences for the trapped Soviet Jewish population, but it had far wider implications, well beyond those of the 1952 trial of the Jewish Anti-fascist Committee... Standing at the apex of the state, Stalin had absolute power. He achieved this not because absolute power was conferred on hm by the state but because he succeeded in finding means to delegitimize the state itself. The Doctors' Plot became his most powerful weapon in the last years of hs life in pursuing this end; it starkly demonstrates that Stalin's power did not derive from the state and its institutions but from the underlying system that allowed him to manipulate them. This book is a study in the exercise of this enormous power. Terror and naked force became the system's principal means of achieving a world in which equality was based on mass disenfranchisement. The resulting inversion of the Western ideal of the social contract caused radical distrust to prevail throughout the social-political-human world that Lenin founded and Stalin developed....As the case of the quack botanist T.D. Lysenko demonstrates, rational thought itself was subject to the dictates of the state. Coinciding with the early phase of the Cold War, Stalin's conspiracy against the Jewish doctors reflected both the general external and internal conditions of the Soviet Union at the time. As such the plot has significance far beyond specific Kremlin rivalries, Stalin's personal anti-Semitism...The Doctor's Plot was the natural outgrowth of the bureaucratic, political, psychological, and moral structure of Stalin's system of government.... The plot grew far beyond the boundaries of an anti-Semitic action. It encompassed the security services and led to widespread purges. Kremlin leaders like Molotov, Mikoyan, and Voroshilov were denounced as spies. Citizen's committees were formed to identify and denounce Jews and other dubious individuals. Scientists, doctors, and intellectuals were arrested or came under increasing suspicion. As newly discovered documents show, in the months preceding Stalin's death four new, large concentration camps were put under construction." --Jonathan Brent and Vladimir Naumov (Stalin's Last Crime, pp. 3-9) 'A fact is the most stubborn thing in the world.' --Mikhail Bulgakov (The Master and the Margarita) --Nick |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
This post corrects the inadvertent spacing flaws in my previous post.
chapman Billy wrote in message ...(to A.D. Danilecki): I suspect that this quote from "The Saving Remnant", particularly the initial clause has irritated you, which is a matter of regret. The Battle of Warsaw, which may be what you have in the back of your mind, has sometimes been considered one of the decisive battles in history, given that this Polish victory successfully halted the Bolsheviks until the outbreak of WWII. Dear Simon, Polish victory (under Pilsudski) in the Battle of Warsaw has been attributed largely to disunity among the Red Army's leaders, particularly to conflict between General Tukhachevsky and Stalin. (In 1937, Tukhachevsky was executed by Stalin.) Until 1939, Poland had large minorities of Belorussians, Ukrainians, and Germans. Putting the thing crudely, under the Reds Jews merely faced economic ruin; under the Whites, they faced death, a quick one if they were lucky. "Do you want to be more humanistic than Lenin, who ordered Dzerzhinsky to throw Savinkov out a window? Dzerzhinsky had for this job special people--Letts who fulfilled this commission. Dzerzhinsky was no match for you, but he didn't shirk the dirty work. You work like waiters in white gloves. If you want to be Chekhists, take off your gloves. Chekhist work--this is for peasants and not for barons." --Stalin (November 1952, as quoted by S.D. Ignatiev) "Boris Savinkov's whole life had been spent in conspiracy. Without religion as the Churches teach it; without morals as men prescribe them; without home or country; without wife or child, or kith or kin; without friend; without fear; hunter and hunted; implacable, unconquerable, alone. Yet he had found his consolation. His being was organised upon a theme. His life was devoted to a cause. That cause was the freedom of the Russian people. In that cause there was nothing he would not dare or endure. He had not even the stimulus of fanaticism. He was that extraordinary product--a Terrorist for moderate aims. A reasonable and enlightened policy-- the Parliamentary system of England, the land tenure of France, freedom, toleration and goodwill--to be achieved whenever necessary by dynamite at the risk of death. No disguise could baffle his clear-cut perceptions. The forms of government might be revolutionised; the top might become the bottom and the bottom the top; the meaning of words, the association of ideas, the roles of individuals, the semblance of things might be changed out of all recognition without deceiving him. His instinct was sure; his course was unchanging. However winds might veer or currents shift, he always knew the port for which he was making; he always steered by the same star, and that star was red." --Winston Churchill (Great Contemporaries, p. 126) (Boris Savinkov, who was supported by the British SIS, was an important leader of the Whites during the Russian Civil War.) Here's a new book: "Stalin's Last Crime: The Plot Against the Jewish Doctors, 1948-1953" by Jonathan Brent and Vladimir Naumov (2003) "Stalin's Doctors' Plot came to worldwide attention in January 1953, two months before his death. It has been called 'the provocation of the century'; it has also been described as the irrational product of the aging dictator's diseased mind. Though Stalin died before he realized his intentions, the archival record allows us to reconstruct his purpose with some confidence.... The 'dyelo vrachey' (case of the doctors), as it was called by the Soviet government, was alleged at the time to be a widespread conspiracy in the Soviet medical profession organized by Jewish physicians against Kremlin leaders. A.A. Zhdanov was one victim; A.S. Scherbakov was another....Jewish doctors were accused of either murdering these leaders or planning their murders in league with American intelligence and a corrupt Ministry of state security (MGB). Hundreds of doctors were arrested over a period of five months, beginning in October 1952 and ending in February 1953.... After Stalin's death, in March 1953, the core group of thirty-seven doctors and their wives was released from prison. More releases followed in a general amnesty; apparent calm returned to daily life. Of the thirty-seven, only seventeen were Jews. Of the original group of six doctors accused of murdering A.A. Zhdanov in 1948, none was Jewish with the exception of the EKG technician, Sophia Karpai. This fact is one of the plot's deepest tangles. Today it is generally thought that the Doctors' Plot instead of being a conspiracy of doctors against the government ws a conspiracy by the government against the Jewish doctors. The documents assembled in this book tell a different story. They show us that the 'case of the doctors' was actually a conspiracy of the government, in the person of Stalin, against itself. Had it succeeded, its rabid, anti-Semitic character would have had devastating consequences for the trapped Soviet Jewish population, but it had far wider implications, well beyond those of the 1952 trial of the Jewish Anti-fascist Committee... Standing at the apex of the state, Stalin had absolute power. He achieved this not because absolute power was conferred on him by the state but because he succeeded in finding means to delegitimize the state itself. The Doctors' Plot became his most powerful weapon in the last years of his life in pursuing this end; it starkly demonstrates that Stalin's power did not derive from the state and its institutions but from the underlying system that allowed him to manipulate them. This book is a study in the exercise of this enormous power. Terror and naked force became the system's principal means of achieving a world in which equality was based on mass disenfrachisement. The resulting inversion of the Western ideal of the social contract caused radical distrust to prevail throughout the social-political-human world that Lenin founded and Stalin developed....As the case of the quack botanist T.D. Lysenko demonstrates, rational thought itself was subject to the dictates of the state. Coinciding with the early phase of the Cold War, Stalin's conspiracy against the Jewish doctors reflected both the general external and internal conditions of the Soviet Union at the time. As such the plot has significance far beyond specific Kremlin rivalries, Stalin's personal anti-Semitism...The Doctor's Plot was the natural outgrowth of the bureaucratic, political, psychological, and moral structure of Stalin's system of government.... The plot grew far beyond the boundaries of an anti-Semitic action. It encompassed the security services and led to widespread purges. Kremlin leaders like Molotov, Mikoyan, and Voroshilov were denounced as spies. Citizens' committees were formed to identify and denounce Jews and other dubious individuals. Scientists, doctors, and intellectuals were arrested or came under increasing suspicion. As newly discovered documents show, in the months preceding Stalin's death four new, large concentration camps were put under construction." --Jonathan Brent and Vladimir Naumov (Stalin's Last Crime, pp. 3-9) 'A fact is the most stubborn thing in the world.' --Mikhail Bulgakov (The Master and the Margarita) --Nick |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nick wrote:
chapman Billy wrote in message ...(to A.D. Danilecki): I suspect that this quote from "The Saving Remnant", particularly the initial clause has irritated you, which is a matter of regret. The Battle of Warsaw, which may be what you have in the back of your mind, has sometimes been considered one of the decisive battles in history, given that this Polish victory successfully halted the Bolsheviks until the outbreak of WWII. Dear Simon, Polish victory in the Battle of Warsaw has been attributed largely to disunity among the Red Army's leaders, particularly conflict between General Tukachevski and Stalin. (Eventually, Tukachevski was executed by Stalin.) Until 1939, Poland had large minorities of Belorussians, Ukrainians, and Germans. Putting the thing crudely, under the Reds Jews merely faced economic ruin; under the Whites, they faced death, a quick one if they were lucky. "Do you want to be more humanistic than Lenin, who ordered Dzerzhinsky to throw Savinkov out a window? Dzerzhinsky had for this job special people-- Letts who fulfilled this commission. Dzerzhinsky was no match for you, but he didn't shirk the dirty work. You work like waiters in white gloves. If you want to be Chekhists, take off your gloves. Chekist work--this is for peasants and not for barons." --Stalin (November 1952, as quoted by S.D. Ignatiev) "Boris Savinkov's whole life had been spent in conspiracy. Without religion as the Churches teach it; without morals as men prescribe them; without home or country; without wife or child, or kith or kin; without friend; without fear; hunter and hunted; implacable, unconquerable, alone. Yet he had found his consolation. His being was organised upon a theme. His life was devoted to a cause. That cause was the freedom of the Russian people. In that cause there was nothing he would not dare or endure. He had not even the stimulus of fanaticism. He was that extraordinary product--a Terrorist for moderate aims. A reasonable and enlightened policy--the Parliamentary system of England, the land tenure of France, freedom, toleration and goodwill--to be achieved whenever necessary by dynamite at the risk of death. No disguise could baffle his clear-cut perceptions. The forms of government might be revolutionised; the top might become the bottom and the bottom the top; the meaning of words, the association of ideas, the roles of individuals, the semblance of things might be changed out of all recognition without deceiving him. His instinct was sure; his course was unchanging. However winds might veer or currents shift, he always knew the port for which he was making; he always steered by the same star, and that star was red." --Winston Churchill (Great Contemporaries, p. 126) (Boris Savinkov, who was supported by the British SIS, was an important leader of the Whites during the Russian Civil War.) Here's a new book: "Stalin's Last Crime: The Plot Against the Jewish Doctors, 1948-1953" by Jonathan Brent and Vladimir Naumov (2003) "Stalin's Doctors' Plot came to worldwide attention in January 1953, two months before his death. It has been called 'the provocation of the century'; it has also been described as the irrational product of the aging dictator's diseased mind. Though Stalin died before he realized his intentions, the archival record allows us to reconstruct his purpose with some confidence.... The 'dyelo vrachey' (case of the doctors), as it was called by the Soviet government, was alleged at the time to be a widespread conspiracy in the Soviet medical profession organized by Jewish physicians against Kremlin leaders. A.A. Zhdanov was one victim; A.S. Scherbakov was another.... Jewish doctors were accused of either murdering these leaders or planning their murders in league with American intelligence and a corrupt Ministry of state security (MGB). Hundreds of doctors were arrested over a period of five months, beginning in October 1952 and ending in February 1953....After Stalin's death, in March 1953, the core group of thirty-seven doctors and their wives was released from prison. More releases followed in a general amnesty; apparent calm returned to daily life. Of the thirty-seven, only seventeen were Jews. Of the original group of six doctors accused of murdering A.A. Zhdanov in 1948, none was Jewish with the exception of the EKG technician, Sophia Karpai. This fact is one of the plot's deepest tangles. Today it is generally thought that the Doctors' Plot instead of being a conspiracy of doctors against the government was a conspiracy by the government against the Jewish doctors. The documents assembled in this book tell a different story. They show us that the 'case of the doctors' was actually a conspiracy of the government, in the person of Stalin, against itself. Had it succeeded, its rabid, anti-Semitic character would have had devastating consequences for the trapped Soviet Jewish population, but it had far wider implications, well beyond those of the 1952 trial of the Jewish Anti-fascist Committee... Standing at the apex of the state, Stalin had absolute power. He achieved this not because absolute power was conferred on hm by the state but because he succeeded in finding means to delegitimize the state itself. The Doctors' Plot became his most powerful weapon in the last years of hs life in pursuing this end; it starkly demonstrates that Stalin's power did not derive from the state and its institutions but from the underlying system that allowed him to manipulate them. This book is a study in the exercise of this enormous power. Terror and naked force became the system's principal means of achieving a world in which equality was based on mass disenfranchisement. The resulting inversion of the Western ideal of the social contract caused radical distrust to prevail throughout the social-political-human world that Lenin founded and Stalin developed....As the case of the quack botanist T.D. Lysenko demonstrates, rational thought itself was subject to the dictates of the state. Coinciding with the early phase of the Cold War, Stalin's conspiracy against the Jewish doctors reflected both the general external and internal conditions of the Soviet Union at the time. As such the plot has significance far beyond specific Kremlin rivalries, Stalin's personal anti-Semitism...The Doctor's Plot was the natural outgrowth of the bureaucratic, political, psychological, and moral structure of Stalin's system of government.... The plot grew far beyond the boundaries of an anti-Semitic action. It encompassed the security services and led to widespread purges. Kremlin leaders like Molotov, Mikoyan, and Voroshilov were denounced as spies. Citizen's committees were formed to identify and denounce Jews and other dubious individuals. Scientists, doctors, and intellectuals were arrested or came under increasing suspicion. As newly discovered documents show, in the months preceding Stalin's death four new, large concentration camps were put under construction." --Jonathan Brent and Vladimir Naumov (Stalin's Last Crime, pp. 3-9) 'A fact is the most stubborn thing in the world.' --Mikhail Bulgakov (The Master and the Margarita) --Nick So what?! I note not a whit mention 'Zhukov' why is this? You can answer this Nick?.. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|