![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: answers |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why is it called The 'Romantic' King's Gambit?
What makes it 'Romantic'? |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
King Leopold wrote:
Why is it called The 'Romantic' King's Gambit? What makes it 'Romantic'? `Romantic' in the sense of romanticism, which Collins defines as `a movement in European art, music and literature in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, characterized by an emphasis on feeling and content rather than order and form.' Dave. -- David Richerby Expensive Permanent Goldfish (TM): www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~davidr/ it's like a fish but it'll be there for ever and break the bank! |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
King Leopold wrote:
Why is it called The 'Romantic' King's Gambit? What makes it 'Romantic'? Don't forget to ask 'when', as well. Wasn't it Spielmann who was described as the last knight of the king's gambit? That should give you the perspective: 1920's or so, when the hyper-modern chess began to become accepted. Playing King's Gambit then probably seemed like hankering for the good old days when an Evans still would be a suprise. And so, of course, romantic -- though 'nostalgic' probably is the better word to use here. Of course, it was said much later than that, some other notion of romanticism may have been used instead. -- Anders Thulin http://www.algonet.se/~ath |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
It follows a 'romantic' notion of chess that despises defense and
admires the all-out attack. Anders Thulin wrote: King Leopold wrote: Why is it called The 'Romantic' King's Gambit? What makes it 'Romantic'? Don't forget to ask 'when', as well. Wasn't it Spielmann who was described as the last knight of the king's gambit? That should give you the perspective: 1920's or so, when the hyper-modern chess began to become accepted. Playing King's Gambit then probably seemed like hankering for the good old days when an Evans still would be a suprise. And so, of course, romantic -- though 'nostalgic' probably is the better word to use here. Of course, it was said much later than that, some other notion of romanticism may have been used instead. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Subject: I need your answers
King Leopold wrote: Why is it called The 'Romantic' King's Gambit? What makes it 'Romantic'? Don't forget to ask 'when', as well. Wasn't it Spielmann who was described as the last knight of the king's gambit? That should give you the perspective: 1920's or so, when the hyper-modern chess began to become accepted. Playing King's Gambit then probably seemed like hankering for the good old days when an Evans still would be a suprise. And so, of course, romantic -- though 'nostalgic' probably is the better word to use here. Of course, it was said much later than that, some other notion of romanticism may have been used instead. -- Anders Thulin http://www.algonet.se/~ath The "Romantic Era" of chess is well described in the German reference book Grosses Schach Lexikon (compiled by Klaus Lindoerfer), which states: "romantische Schachepoche - eine Stilrichtung vom 18. Jahrhundert bis zur ersten Haelfte des 19. Jahrhunderts bis etwa 1860. Lief parallel mit der kulturgeschichtlichen Epoche der Romantik, die zu dieser Zeit in Deutschland, Frankreich und England aufkam. Das Spiel der damaligen Meister betonte die schoepferische, spontane Linie. Aus dieser Zeit stammen viele geniale Kombinationen: die Partien der Meister Legal, Deschappeles, La Bourdonnais, Kieseritzky, Anderssen und Morphy sind voller geistpruehender Ideen." George Mirijanian |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Miriling wrote:
The "Romantic Era" of chess is well described in the German reference book Grosses Schach Lexikon (compiled by Klaus Lindoerfer), which states: "romantische Schachepoche - eine Stilrichtung vom 18. Jahrhundert bis zur ersten Haelfte des 19. Jahrhunderts bis etwa 1860. Only a pity he doesn't address the question of 'when'. Who was it that first called it the 'romatic era'? They hardly used the term themselves -- and so would not have any idea of the Kings Gambit as being particularly romantic. I suspect the hyper-modernists coined the phrase to indicate a type of play they *didn't* follow. (Or perhaps Lasker ... ? Steinitz talked about 'old school' and 'modern school' but he would hardly see the old school in a romantic light ...) -- Anders Thulin http://www.algonet.se/~ath |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
One definition for 'romantic' in my Random House College Dictionary
refers to "a desire for adventure". Certainly the Kings Gambit represents adventurous chess. There is a well-known book by Zagorovsky called "Romantic Chess Openings", covering the Ponziani Opening, Scotch Gambit, Evans Gambit, etc. The Kings Gambit is not included, probably because there was no room in this very short book for such a complicated opening. The book jacket refers to the openings which "were popular in the 'romantic period' of the last century...." "King Leopold" wrote in message ... Why is it called The 'Romantic' King's Gambit? What makes it 'Romantic'? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Who is Nick? | Sam Sloan | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 82 | April 12th 04 02:43 AM |
| I need your answers | King Leopold | rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) | 2 | January 7th 04 10:36 AM |
| Kasparov's remarks about chess software had answers staring him in the face | Alberich | rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) | 3 | November 22nd 03 10:00 PM |
| Take an IQ test here. | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 6 | October 9th 03 05:36 AM | |
| Corrected. | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 3 | October 9th 03 04:31 AM | |