Blessings group,

Anyone knowing anything about the recent solving of old math. problem
(3D into 2D) care to expound? tia..

michael adams wrote:
Anyone knowing anything about the recent solving of old math. problem
(3D into 2D) care to expound?

I'm not sure which mathematical problem you're talking about -- could you
be more specific? Are you referring to Grigori Perelman's purported proof
of the Poincare conjecture? (I say purported merely because the proof has
not yet been published, to the best of my knowledge, and the peer-review
process may find errors. People in the field seem confident that
Perelman's work contains no serious errors.)

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/news/2003-04-15/poincare/
http://www.claymath.org/Millennium_P...re_Conjecture/


Dave.

--
David Richerby Erotic Radio (TM): it's like a radio
www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~davidr/ but it's genuinely erotic!

David Richerby wrote:

michael adams wrote:
Anyone knowing anything about the recent solving of old math. problem
(3D into 2D) care to expound?

I'm not sure which mathematical problem you're talking about -- could you
be more specific? Are you referring to Grigori Perelman's purported proof
of the Poincare conjecture? (I say purported merely because the proof has
not yet been published, to the best of my knowledge, and the peer-review
process may find errors. People in the field seem confident that
Perelman's work contains no serious errors.)

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/news/2003-04-15/poincare/
http://www.claymath.org/Millennium_P...re_Conjecture/

Dave.

Yep! - thanks much, Dai've..