![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: comments, testyourchesscom |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I recently discovered the website http://www.testyourchess.com, and am very
favorably impressed so far. After assessing your approximate chess playing ability with a quick test, it has two main features: 1. Find the Moves: You play through a (real) game, at each move deciding what you would play in the given position. Good moves are rewarded with points; less good moves receive less points and an explanation. 2. Checkmate Challenge: This is easier, since you know that there is a forced checkmate (in one or more moves). The positions are divided into eight levels from simple to mind-bending. When you succeed in finding a mate you go up a level; when you fail you go down. The Challenge is to get as many right in succession as you can. What I like about it: 1. Unlike much other tactical training, it features *real* games and positions, so you're placed inside real games and have to make decisions about moves. 2. It is catered to your level. 3. It is annotated, so you receive an explanation about why your move is wrong, or why another move is better. 4. You receive a score, so it's a challenge for you to improve yourself. Two questions for the newsgroup: 1. Have any other users tried this site, and do you have any comments about your experience with it? Like it? Useful? 2. Is there any software with similar features? Or perhaps PGN files or Chessbase files? -- Gregory Topov --------------------------------------------------------------------- "I don't necessarily agree with everything I say." - Marshall McLuhan |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gregory Topov wrote:
I recently discovered the website http://www.testyourchess.com, and am very favorably impressed so far. After assessing your approximate chess playing ability with a quick test, it has two main features: 1. Find the Moves: You play through a (real) game, at each move deciding what you would play in the given position. Good moves are rewarded with points; less good moves receive less points and an explanation. 2. Checkmate Challenge: This is easier, since you know that there is a forced checkmate (in one or more moves). The positions are divided into eight levels from simple to mind-bending. When you succeed in finding a mate you go up a level; when you fail you go down. The Challenge is to get as many right in succession as you can. What I like about it: 1. Unlike much other tactical training, it features *real* games and positions, so you're placed inside real games and have to make decisions about moves. 2. It is catered to your level. 3. It is annotated, so you receive an explanation about why your move is wrong, or why another move is better. 4. You receive a score, so it's a challenge for you to improve yourself. Two questions for the newsgroup: 1. Have any other users tried this site, and do you have any comments about your experience with it? Like it? Useful? 2. Is there any software with similar features? Or perhaps PGN files or Chessbase files? Two comments: 1. I can't stand the board colours. 2. It gives me a rating of "puma". What the heck does this mean??? |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Keith Boone" wrote in message
able.rogers.com... Gregory Topov wrote: I recently discovered the website http://www.testyourchess.com, and am very favorably impressed so far. Two comments: 1. I can't stand the board colours. 2. It gives me a rating of "puma". What the heck does this mean??? 1. Click "Your Preferences" from the left menu, and you can choose a green board instead of the brown one. Not much choice, I know, but I don't mind the green one personally. 2. Check the FAQ page for info on the animals. Apparently your final percentage matches a different kind of animal. Puma means you got between 80 and 90% - nice going! It seems to be connected with some contest the webmaster ran to kick off the site. -- Gregory Topov --------------------------------------------------------------------- "I don't necessarily agree with everything I say." - Marshall McLuhan |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gregory Topov wrote:
I recently discovered the website http://www.testyourchess.com, and am very favorably impressed so far. [...] Two questions for the newsgroup: 1. Have any other users tried this site, and do you have any comments about your experience with it? Like it? Useful? I spent a couple of hours `finding the moves' last night after reading your post. I've seen things like that on paper but, to be honest, always found them a little tedious. The online format is much more engaging and avoids trying to hide things with bits of paper. So, yes, I'm impressed, too. I'm not sure how beneficial the site is being for my chess as I'm not playing much at the moment. I seem to be getting better at answering their questions but I'm not sure if that's just because I'm learning the author's playing style. :-) 2. Is there any software with similar features? Or perhaps PGN files or Chessbase files? Fritz can annotate games and insert quiz questions but that's not really the same thing. Dave. -- David Richerby Generic Tool (TM): it's like a www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~davidr/ screwdriver but it's just like all the others! |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Keith Boone wrote:
Gregory Topov wrote: I recently discovered the website http://www.testyourchess.com, and am very favorably impressed so far. After assessing your approximate chess playing ability with a quick test, it has two main features: 1. Find the Moves: You play through a (real) game, at each move deciding what you would play in the given position. Good moves are rewarded with points; less good moves receive less points and an explanation. 2. Checkmate Challenge: This is easier, since you know that there is a forced checkmate (in one or more moves). The positions are divided into eight levels from simple to mind-bending. When you succeed in finding a mate you go up a level; when you fail you go down. The Challenge is to get as many right in succession as you can. What I like about it: 1. Unlike much other tactical training, it features *real* games and positions, so you're placed inside real games and have to make decisions about moves. 2. It is catered to your level. 3. It is annotated, so you receive an explanation about why your move is wrong, or why another move is better. 4. You receive a score, so it's a challenge for you to improve yourself. Two questions for the newsgroup: 1. Have any other users tried this site, and do you have any comments about your experience with it? Like it? Useful? 2. Is there any software with similar features? Or perhaps PGN files or Chessbase files? Two comments: 1. I can't stand the board colours. 2. It gives me a rating of "puma". What the heck does this mean??? "Puma" equates Mountain-Lion.(USA). = The American Lion commonly lives in the wilderness, mountain (rockies) closer to God. It is a fabled predator, which will not ignore an obtuse & stupid human rambler, at all!. It has no 'ruff'. See, African 'leo' - male variation, 'feline' - "King" etc. for a related image of LION - (felicitous).. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| comments please | Martin | rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) | 3 | March 16th 04 12:31 PM |
| Lev Khariton's comments on Kasparov's interview to "Financial Times" | Aryeh Davidoff | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 8 | November 18th 03 10:53 PM |
| Lev Khariton's comments on FIDE Congress and Kasparov-Fritz match | Aryeh Davidoff | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 2 | November 10th 03 09:14 PM |
| GK's Comments in My Great Predecessors | Bob Lablaw | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | October 16th 03 01:11 PM |
| PGN spec: locations of comments? | JVarsoke | rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) | 3 | July 16th 03 05:00 PM |