![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: chess, copyrighting, games |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ -- rgc.misc and rgc.politics ]
KidDon wrote: "Ray Gordon" wrote: Are there any REALLY strong players who want this to happen? We've been over this before. The moves of the games (or positions), even with mention of the players or the event, are not copyrightable. see, e.g. http://www.ernietheattorney.net/erni...orting_ev.html I don't think that's a very good reference as chess obviously isn't an athletic sport. Dave. -- David Richerby Transparent Simple Wine (TM): it's www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~davidr/ like a vintage Beaujolais but it has no moving parts and you can see right through it! |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 04 Mar 2004, David Richerby said:
I don't think that's a very good reference as chess obviously isn't an athletic sport. rec.games.go has been discussing this recently. Some of the links that came out of that discussion we http://www.bcmchess.co.uk/britbase/about.htm: British Chess Magazine: ``Legally the actual moves of any game as played are considered to be in the public domain and not subject to any copyright laws.'' http://senseis.xmp.net/?KifuCopyrightDiscussion: ``Games cannot be subject to copyright; being a product of conflict (however we like to think of Go as an amicable conversation, it's at least a heated debate), neither player can lay claim to ownership; neither can it be claimed to be jointly owned, since the sides worked at cross purposes and not with the intent of creating the end product.'' http://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-general.html: ``Copyright does not protect facts, ideas, systems, or methods of operation, although it may protect the way these things are expressed.'' I think an interpretation as ``The actual moves of a game are in the public domain; once someone has added value such as commentary to a game, though, the new product can be considered copyrighted'' is sane. - Chris. -- Chris Ball http://www.mrao.cam.ac.uk/~cjb/ Inference Group: http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/is/ |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 20:35:59 +0000, Chris Ball
wrote: I think an interpretation as ``The actual moves of a game are in the public domain; once someone has added value such as commentary to a game, though, the new product can be considered copyrighted'' is sane. I agree with that. Replace you know what by j to email |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"David Richerby" skrev i meddelandet ... [ -- rgc.misc and rgc.politics ] KidDon wrote: "Ray Gordon" wrote: Are there any REALLY strong players who want this to happen? We've been over this before. The moves of the games (or positions), even with mention of the players or the event, are not copyrightable. see, e.g. http://www.ernietheattorney.net/erni...orting_ev.html I don't think that's a very good reference as chess obviously isn't an athletic sport. No, but the similarities are that facts are not copyrightable. Any recordings, transcriptions, or commentaries are copyrightable. The fact that something did happen is not. Some persons might be present. They could move some chess pieces. Maybe it was a sunny day? If you prepare a report on that, the report is protected by your copyright. The fact that something actually did occur, is not. Bo Persson |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jud McCranie" wrote in message ... On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 20:35:59 +0000, Chris Ball wrote: I think an interpretation as ``The actual moves of a game are in the public domain; once someone has added value such as commentary to a game, though, the new product can be considered copyrighted'' is sane. I agree with that. Replace you know what by j to email Bizarre, though, that Rubinstein or Schlechter make not dollar one from the printing of their games - but commentators do! Their comments are copyright! |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:37:32 +0100, "Bo Persson" wrote:
No, but the similarities are that facts are not copyrightable. Any recordings, transcriptions, or commentaries are copyrightable. The fact that something did happen is not. I think you're right. When sports events are broadcast in the US, the legal statement given refers to the accounts and descriptions of the game being copyrighted, not the game itself. Replace you know what by j to email |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| IS IT WRONG TO PLAY VIOLENT VIDEO GAMES? | Gunny Bunny | rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) | 5 | June 2nd 04 09:44 PM |
| rec.games.chess.misc FAQ [2/4] | pribut@yahoo.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | March 3rd 04 11:06 AM |
| Thoughts on 'Bobby Fischer Teaches Chess'? | Vic Martinez | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 33 | October 29th 03 01:49 PM |