![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: game, situation |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#71
|
|||
|
|||
|
ROFL
"Terry" wrote in message ... LOL "Dan Pressnell" wrote in message om... Oh, and Mr. Jordan, I forgot to say this.... You may now resume kissing Jason's ass. I'm I being sufficiently impolite to you now? Dan "Dan Pressnell" wrote in message om... "Benjamin Jordan" wrote in message ... Despite Jason's abrasive manner, he HAS answered the question and it makes sense. He has reiterated several times that he is talking about _sportsmanship_, which includes concepts like "courtesy, striving spirit, and grace in losing" (American Heritage Dictionary) A badly losing player who is running out the clock to annoy his opponent is not exhibiting these. The USCF already has a Code of Ethics. One of the examples of unethical conduct is "Deliberately failing to play at one's best in a game, in any manner inconsistent with the principles of good sportsmanship, honesty, or fair play." It also describes sanctions such as Censure, Suspension, etc. There is already an "Insufficient Losing Chances" rule so that players will not lose patently drawn positions on time. Why not have a similar "Insufficient Survival Chances" rule. As Jason described, the TD would not tell someone when to resign, but a player could claim a win due to unethical conduct and the TD would arbitrate. He described no such thing. If you think he did, please post his reply for me to see. Why should this need to be spelled out? Repeating demands that he "answer the question" in overly polite language is baiting and harassment. Par for the Dan Pressnell course, I guess. Please repost or direct me to the post he made describing the penalty. And how does "failing to play your at one's best" include failing to resign? Also, it's pretty stupid to say that the penalty for resigning too late should be to have an arbirated win. As for "unethical conduct" please point me to any rule of FIDE or the USCF that says failure to resign, but playing on for a chance, is unethical conduct. If you think asking a question politely is harassment, then you need to learn what manners are. I've made no personal attacks in this thread. If you object to my being polite, then I'll say "**** you, you stupid prick." Are you pleased now, you sorry excuse for a human being? Will you now post your chess rating under the moronic impression that the number is the measure of your worth as a human being? Let me say it again, Mr. I-don't-like-polite-posters. **** YOU. Let's not have any more complains about polite postings, okay? Dan |
| Ads |
|
#72
|
|||
|
|||
|
You're the idiot that was put in your place pressnell and you know it. He
got you so made you didn't know if you were coming or going, making random insults and swearing like a little baby. Jason Repa |
|
#73
|
|||
|
|||
|
Amazing how similar this post is to the one placed into
rec.games.chess.computer... but both have different names. Dan "Benjamin Jordan" wrote in message news ![]() Please don't go back to your psychic crop circle group Pressnell. I need some more of your posts to print out for when I have insomnia. Actually, I have to admit that it is amusing watching you backpedal into flames. Face it, you got trounced and have nothing meaningful left to say. Let's search Google for your past threads and see what comes up: Kook nomination - Dan Pressnell CONTINUED HARRASSMENT FROM MR. DAN PRESSNELL Lies by Dan Pressnell-NAZI THREAD Dan Pressnell SMEARS a synonym for liar: Dan Pressnell Dan Pressnell's delusions REPOST: Supernews continues to allow spamming by Dan ... Wow, and that's just the first page. TKO! |
|
#74
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is it amazing? I'll take your word for it - I didn't see it. If you search
Google groups for my e-mail address you will find hundreds of posts going back a couple of years, and they aren't flames. This is the only address I've used on Usenet. I don't run around trolling with different identities and throwing tantrums when someone disagrees with me. Before you try to insinuate such things, you should do a quick search. As I mentioned, you might try learning chess to improve your mind. I'm sure you could find someone at the alzheimer home to practice with. "Dan Pressnell" wrote in message om... Amazing how similar this post is to the one placed into rec.games.chess.computer... but both have different names. Dan "Benjamin Jordan" wrote in message news ![]() Please don't go back to your psychic crop circle group Pressnell. I need some more of your posts to print out for when I have insomnia. Actually, I have to admit that it is amusing watching you backpedal into flames. Face it, you got trounced and have nothing meaningful left to say. Let's search Google for your past threads and see what comes up: Kook nomination - Dan Pressnell CONTINUED HARRASSMENT FROM MR. DAN PRESSNELL Lies by Dan Pressnell-NAZI THREAD Dan Pressnell SMEARS a synonym for liar: Dan Pressnell Dan Pressnell's delusions REPOST: Supernews continues to allow spamming by Dan ... Wow, and that's just the first page. TKO! |
|
#75
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dan Pressnell" wrote in message om... Amazing how similar this post is to the one placed into rec.games.chess.computer... but both have different names. Dan Amazing how you keep crying like a little kid after being put in your place. Jason Repa |
|
#76
|
|||
|
|||
|
"newsnewsnews" wrote in message
news:bCk7c.871756$X%5.60213@pd7tw2no... "Dan Pressnell" wrote in message om... Amazing how similar this post is to the one placed into rec.games.chess.computer... but both have different names. Dan Amazing how you keep crying like a little kid after being put in your place. Are you referring to where I was put into my place by those kooks you rely on? You are a piece of ****, Jason. And you still haven't had the guts to answer my question. You are a fraud. Dan |
|
#77
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Benjamin Jordan" wrote in message
... Is it amazing? I'll take your word for it - I didn't see it. If you search Google groups for my e-mail address you will find hundreds of posts going back a couple of years, and they aren't flames. This is the only address I've used on Usenet. I don't run around trolling with different identities and throwing tantrums when someone disagrees with me. Before you try to insinuate such things, you should do a quick search. As I mentioned, you might try learning chess to improve your mind. I'm sure you could find someone at the alzheimer home to practice with. Mr. Jordan, I have no intent of indulging in obsessive behavior such as conducting a background search for your postings for the last several years. I saw what you posted. You saw what a disgusting piece of filth Jason is, yet you chose to attack me. You call me a troll, you say my "overly polite" postings get under your skin and you say I'm sanctimonious. You are here implying that I'm a troll who uses different identities to throw tantrums. You now throw out the pointless insinuation that I should learn chess to improve my mind, and you say I can find somebody with Alzheimer's disease to practice with. Additionally, you claimed that I was asking Jason a question that he had already answered, when the fact was that he never had answered it. It was you who came to his defense and suggested an answer for him because "it got under your skin" that I repeated politely the unanswered question, which he only responded to with profane personal insults. To put that all in the same post where you brag about not flaming is pure hypocrisy. You defended Jason because you didn't want to see him shown up in polite postings. I have seen all I need to know about you in your attacks against me. If you don't want your victims responding to your hypocrisy, it would be better not to display the hypocrisy in the first place. Your sympathies clearly lie with Jason. The only question remaining now is why. Dan |
|
#78
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dan Pressnell" wrote in message . com... "Benjamin Jordan" wrote in message ... Is it amazing? I'll take your word for it - I didn't see it. If you search Google groups for my e-mail address you will find hundreds of posts going back a couple of years, and they aren't flames. This is the only address I've used on Usenet. I don't run around trolling with different identities and throwing tantrums when someone disagrees with me. Before you try to insinuate such things, you should do a quick search. As I mentioned, you might try learning chess to improve your mind. I'm sure you could find someone at the alzheimer home to practice with. Mr. Jordan, I have no intent of indulging in obsessive behavior such as conducting a background search for your postings for the last several years. I saw what you posted. You saw what a disgusting piece of filth Jason is, yet you chose to attack me. You call me a troll, you say my "overly polite" postings get under your skin and you say I'm sanctimonious. You are here implying that I'm a troll who uses different identities to throw tantrums. You now throw out the pointless insinuation that I should learn chess to improve my mind, and you say I can find somebody with Alzheimer's disease to practice with. Additionally, you claimed that I was asking Jason a question that he had already answered, when the fact was that he never had answered it. It was you who came to his defense and suggested an answer for him because "it got under your skin" that I repeated politely the unanswered question, which he only responded to with profane personal insults. To put that all in the same post where you brag about not flaming is pure hypocrisy. You defended Jason because you didn't want to see him shown up in polite postings. I have seen all I need to know about you in your attacks against me. If you don't want your victims responding to your hypocrisy, it would be better not to display the hypocrisy in the first place. Your sympathies clearly lie with Jason. The only question remaining now is why. Dan What a ****ing moron you are Dan! You are now clearly the best candidate for the idiot of the newsgroup award. People are attacking you because you are a rude, uninformed jackass troll that contributes nothing to the newsgroup other than harassment and nonense. Jason Repa |
|
#79
|
|||
|
|||
|
You have proven to all what a worthless snivelling little coward you are
Dan. You were totally put in your place by Jorden and have not stopped crying and whining about it since. Do the group a favour and **** OFF. Jason Repa |
|
#80
|
|||
|
|||
|
"newsnewsnews" wrote in message
news:Ofm7c.872377$X%5.112372@pd7tw2no... What a ****ing moron you are Dan! You are now clearly the best candidate for the idiot of the newsgroup award. People are attacking you because you are a rude, uninformed jackass troll that contributes nothing to the newsgroup other than harassment and nonense. I've only seen two people attacking me. You and Benjamin Jordan. Dan |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| IS IT WRONG TO PLAY VIOLENT VIDEO GAMES? | Gunny Bunny | rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) | 5 | June 2nd 04 09:44 PM |
| Game Situation | Sam Sloan | rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) | 196 | March 30th 04 05:28 AM |
| Game > Play > Outcome > Analysis > Game Theory | Soph Omore | rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) | 6 | November 23rd 03 02:01 AM |
| Game > Play > Outcome > Analysis > Game Theory | Soph Omore | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 6 | November 23rd 03 02:01 AM |
| Game > Play > Outcome > Analysis > Game Theory | Soph Omore | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 7 | November 23rd 03 02:01 AM |