![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: check, players, saying, stopped |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
John A Swartz wrote:
Yes, I used to play an older gentleman that would say "Madame" when he attacked my queen. A cousin of mine insisted that it was illegal to attack a queen without announcing it with "Gardé!", or "En Gardé!", and "Touché!" when capturing the queen, so I need to do other capture after a nice fork or something like (that time, I was a 10 year old patzer, now, besides still being a patzer, I know a little more...). Sorry for the "engrish". []s -- ..O. Cesar A. K. Grossmann ICQ UIN: 35659423 ...O http://www.LinuxByGrossmann.cjb.net/ OOO Quidquid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur |
| Ads |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
"Ray Gordon" wrote: If you think that's bad, I once announced a mate in six without realizing that tradition had changed in the past 150 years or so. Yeah, well, can't you just say that that's what people did when you learned to play? ;-) --Harold Buck "I used to rock and roll all night, and party every day. Then it was every other day. . . ." -Homer J. Simpson |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
I almost forgot. When someone checks you and says "check," after you get out
you say, "uncheck". We did this for a night at club one time. It was fun--once. I can imagine a room full of tournament players doing this. |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
PJDBAD wrote:
I almost forgot. When someone checks you and says "check," after you get out you say, "uncheck". We did this for a night at club one time. It was fun--once. I can imagine a room full of tournament players doing this. Well, I will try this someday. Or another thing more funny: adding sound effects to the moves. Can you imagine that? A room full of people making strange noises while playing chess? You almost can tell the nurse is late with the medication... Sorry for the "engrish". []s -- ..O. Cesar A. K. Grossmann ICQ UIN: 35659423 ...O http://www.LinuxByGrossmann.cjb.net/ OOO Quidquid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur Clique e Ajude! http://www.clickfome.com.br/ http://www.sitedafome.com.br/ http://www.clickajuda.com.br/ http://www.clickarvore.com.br/ Soja Transgênica: http://tinyurl.com/2pfou |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Cesar A. K. Grossmann" wrote:
.... Or another thing more funny: adding sound effects to the moves. Can you imagine that? .... I'm reminded of Bomb Chess. At the beginning of the game, each player secretly designates one of his pieces as the Bomb. If a player captures the opponent's Bomb, he loses immediately. Invariably, the player whose Bomb is captured waits for his opponent to press the clock, then makes an exploding noise. Incidentally, to make it a real game, it is necessary to outlaw making the Queen the Bomb. Too easy to get it forcibly captured. Of course, there would be no point in designating your King as the Bomb, either. Bill Smythe |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
"Bill Smythe" wrote: "Cesar A. K. Grossmann" wrote: .... Or another thing more funny: adding sound effects to the moves. Can you imagine that? .... I'm reminded of Bomb Chess. At the beginning of the game, each player secretly designates one of his pieces as the Bomb. If a player captures the opponent's Bomb, he loses immediately. Invariably, the player whose Bomb is captured waits for his opponent to press the clock, then makes an exploding noise. Incidentally, to make it a real game, it is necessary to outlaw making the Queen the Bomb. Too easy to get it forcibly captured. Of course, there would be no point in designating your King as the Bomb, either. Yeah, but MY king is "da bomb"! --Harold Buck "I used to rock and roll all night, and party every day. Then it was every other day. . . ." -Homer J. Simpson |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bill Smythe" wrote in message ... "Cesar A. K. Grossmann" wrote: .... Or another thing more funny: adding sound effects to the moves. Can you imagine that? .... I'm reminded of Bomb Chess. At the beginning of the game, each player secretly designates one of his pieces as the Bomb. If a player captures the opponent's Bomb, he loses immediately. Invariably, the player whose Bomb is captured waits for his opponent to press the clock, then makes an exploding noise. Incidentally, to make it a real game, it is necessary to outlaw making the Queen the Bomb. Too easy to get it forcibly captured. Of course, there would be no point in designating your King as the Bomb, either. Can you designate pawns? |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
While on the subject, is it in the rules anywhere that you have to announce
"En Passant" captures? I just got off the phone with a friend who was insisting that you must announce all "En Passant" captures. ================================ "A computer never gets tired, frustrated, thirsty, needs to use the bathroom or comes down with a horrible headache during a match." Kaspy ================================ "gorkov43" wrote in message ... Was he putting the other player in check? There is no rule that I am aware of that says you can't announce check if it is check. Now if it wasn't check, I'd guess you have a complaint. Ken Actually, im pretty sure check or no check, the only time you speak to your opponent is to offer a draw or to accept/decline such, to resign the game, or to warn that you are about to adjust the pieces. Calling out "check" to indicate such is against the rules, I do believe, and the TD should make him stop at someones complaint. |
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
Chuck wrote:
While on the subject, is it in the rules anywhere that you have to announce "En Passant" captures? I just got off the phone with a friend who was insisting that you must announce all "En Passant" captures. As gorkov43 says, the only times at which one must speak to one's opponent in a game of chess is to offer or accept a draw, to resign or to give notice that you're about to adjust the pieces. To that, one could add speaking to the TD to raise issues about the game. Dave. -- David Richerby Unholy Evil Drink (TM): it's like a www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~davidr/ refreshing juice beverage but it's genuinely evil and also a crime against nature! |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Alan O'Brien" wrote:
Can you designate pawns? Sure. I had one opponent who, as Black, always designated his QN. He would promptly maneuver it from b8-c6-b4-c2, and I had trouble getting away from all the checks without capturing the Bomb. Eventually, I simply designated my c2-pawn as my Bomb, never moved it from its original square, and simply waited for his QN (alias his Bomb) to capture it. Bomb takes Bomb, of course, is a losing move. Bill Smythe |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Statistics on USCF rated tournaments in 2003 | Mike Nolan | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 20 | February 28th 04 03:04 AM |
| Statistics on USCF rated tournaments in 2003 | Sam Sloan | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 1 | February 26th 04 02:37 AM |
| Can FIDE really rate players down to 1001 ?? | Sam Sloan | rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) | 9 | January 28th 04 09:02 PM |
| Can FIDE really rate players down to 1001 ?? | Sam Sloan | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 11 | January 28th 04 09:02 PM |
| Can FIDE really rate players down to 1001 ?? | Sam Sloan | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 11 | January 28th 04 09:02 PM |