Greetings to Goran Tomic,

After reviewing your posted games, and the considerable doscourse as
to if you are (or, are not) an alter ego of Robert James Fischer, I
would be honoured to engage you for a game in which the moves are
posted to this forum.

For my part, I plan to ignore the kibbitzers.

Feel free to take the White pieces, and post your opening move.
Otherwise, I move 1. e4. I am comfortable with the possibility of two
games simultaneously (one each with White and Black).

As a forewarning, I should let you know that I have studied chess on
and off in my sparetime for years. Although I have an aversion to
tournament playing conditions, I do regard myself as a fully capable
player. In the style and intensity of my approach to our game, I
won't manifest in any way a casual approach to the experience.

If we are men of honour, then there is no need for any time rules; the
goal is to play great chess, and to post when a firm decision as to
each move has been made.


Sincerely,
Michael Sayers

(Michael Sayers) wrote in message . com...
Greetings to Goran Tomic,

After reviewing your posted games, and the considerable doscourse as
to if you are (or, are not) an alter ego of Robert James Fischer, I
would be honoured to engage you for a game in which the moves are
posted to this forum.

For my part, I plan to ignore the kibbitzers.

Feel free to take the White pieces, and post your opening move.
Otherwise, I move 1. e4. I am comfortable with the possibility of two
games simultaneously (one each with White and Black).

As a forewarning, I should let you know that I have studied chess on
and off in my sparetime for years. Although I have an aversion to
tournament playing conditions, I do regard myself as a fully capable
player. In the style and intensity of my approach to our game, I
won't manifest in any way a casual approach to the experience.

If we are men of honour, then there is no need for any time rules; the
goal is to play great chess, and to post when a firm decision as to
each move has been made.


Sincerely,
Michael Sayers

You're on Michael Sayers. I cannot be beaten on my favorite opening.
Bring on the world to be with you on this if you like. Let's play!

Goran Fischer vs. Michael Sayers

1.e4

It's your move!

Best Regards,

Goran Fischer

You see what has happened?

GOran has disappeared once again...just as we were onto him. Before he
would not let a fischer post go by unargued. Just to mention Fischer on
the group was a crime according to Goran.

Goran is Bobby Fischer.

And Goran Fischer is an imposter!

..

(Goran Fischer) wrote in message . com...
You're on Michael Sayers. I cannot be beaten on my favorite opening.
Bring on the world to be with you on this if you like. Let's play!

Goran Fischer vs. Michael Sayers

1.e4

It's your move!

Best Regards,

Goran Fischer

Greetings,

I wish you the best with this game. I prefer not have assistance from
other players, as there will be more satisfaction in the game if I
rely on my own resources. I love chess, but not the methods of most
chess players - out of the players whom I admire enough to respect
their advice, all but a few are long since dead.

I proceed thus:

1. ... e5


Regards,
Michael Sayers

Michael Sayers wrote:
(Goran Fischer) wrote:
You're on Michael Sayers. I cannot be beaten on my favorite opening.
Bring on the world to be with you on this if you like. Let's play!

Goran Fischer vs. Michael Sayers

1.e4

I wish you the best with this game. I prefer not have assistance from
other players, as there will be more satisfaction in the game if I
rely on my own resources.

If you don't want the participation of the group, please take this to
E-mail.


Dave.

--
David Richerby Love Toy (TM): it's like a fun child's
www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~davidr/ toy that you can share with someone
special!

Goran Fischer vs. Michael Sayers

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3

Richerby is right, we are in a chess forum therefore he should be able
to participate in the discussion. I don't have any problems with that.

Goran

Eric Hicks wrote in message ...
You see what has happened?

GOran has disappeared once again...just as we were onto him. Before he
would not let a fischer post go by unargued. Just to mention Fischer on
the group was a crime according to Goran.

Goran is Bobby Fischer.

And Goran Fischer is an imposter!

Maybe, but Goran Fischer is using AOL and signing in from the
Philippines, in the city of Bagiuo.

David Richerby wrote in message ...
If you don't want the participation of the group, please take this to
E-mail.


Dave.

Greetings,

As I infer from his email, Goran Fischer may support group
participation. Feel free to offer advice to him as the game proceeds.
For my part, I feel that the Black piece army will function better
with one general at the top.

The moves so far in Goran Fischer vs. Michael Sayers:

1. e4 e5

Regards,
Michael Sayers

(Goran Fischer) wrote in message . com...
You're on Michael Sayers. I cannot be beaten on my favorite opening.
Bring on the world to be with you on this if you like. Let's play!

Goran Fischer vs. Michael Sayers

1.e4

It's your move!

Best Regards,

Goran Fischer

Greetings,

The moves so far in our game a 1. e4 e5

Are you afraid I will be able to equalize against you, by merely
having opted for a classical opening? You CAN be beaten on your
favourite opening, so this might also be a reason for your sudden
timidity. Everyone who has played chess any at all, has lost games.

As I said, I am adverse to tournament playing conditions, since chess
is an art which requires a fully honourable approach for its
fulfillment. Honourable men do not benefit from chess clocks in the
rendering of profound moves at the chess board, and many great
contests have marred by time pressure. I recently went through all
the games again from the '53 Zurich-Neuhausen tournament, and need the
unnecessary checks in the game Averbakh - Kotov, near the time
control, from round 14. The quality of a chess time can not only be
diminished by the allocation of a limited amount of time to a given
number of moves, but also by an insufficient total time quantity for
the game (or, match rules in which draws in a very limited number of
games, a given number of wins, are the primary deciding factor in
designating a victor). Morphy's games would not be what they were,
had clocks been in use, mainly due to the fact that his opponents
would not have had the time needed to put up a real struggle against
his ingenuity, and perhaps slightly due to the time needs required for
Morphy to work out his ingenuities. Lasker almost lost his match with
Schlechter, in an outcome for which Schlechter would have won merely a
single game.

While there is no time stipulation in our game, I won't wait
indefinitely for your reply in the 1. e4 e5 position, as there is no
TN in that position worthy of such detailed analysis as to require so
many days for an examination. Next Monday (May 24th), I will quit
checking this Google group for your reply, and assume that either you
from been diverted from continuing in the game, regard it is an
endeavor unworthy of your attention, or else are afraid to play.

Perhaps you will care to obviate the lattermost speculation.


Regards,
Michael Sayers

P.S. - Michael Basman, if your reading this, feel free to send me an
email. I have wanted to take the Black pieces vs. your Grob opening
for a long time, but will never play you in a tournament.

We can conduct the game via private email.

"Maybe, but Goran Fischer is using AOL and signing in from the
Philippines, in the city of Bagiuo. "

Is this true or were you joking?

Did you really trace back the post?

..