A Chess forum. ChessBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ChessBanter forum » Chess Newsgroups » rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: ,

AF4C Proposal



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 5th 04, 02:35 PM
Sam Sloan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default AF4C Proposal

On 05 Jun 2004 09:01:24 GMT, (WPraeder) wrote:

PROPOSED PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN USCF AND AMERICA'S FOUNDATION FOR CHESS

[snip] ...

BASIC PRINCIPLES

The following are the basic principles any such arrangement should observe:
1) The USCF remains the overall membership organization for any arrangement,
and the governing body for chess in the US. In case of a merger, the
organization continues as the US Chess Federation.

2) Very large donations are arranged by AF4C to stabilize USCF's current
condition.

3) In return for these very substantial donations and future contributions of
resources, a new model for the USCF Board will be established. That model will
allow certain positions to be provided to large donors, while others will be
elected by USCF.


Since you are a candidate for election, we need to know whether you,
Wayne Praeder, are in favor of this.

I will tell you right now that I am opposed. For many years you have
been the strongest advocate of the OMOV or "One Member One Vote"
system. I am surprised to see that now you are suggesting that several
members of the USCF Board be wealthy people who are not elected but
who instead make large donations to the organization.

The USCF has been in existence since 1939. The American Foundation for
Chess has only been around for three years. While you speak of how
wealthy the American Foundation for Chess Board Members are, you fail
to mention the fact that they reneged on the deal they made and could
not come up with the money to hold the US Championship as schedluled
in January 2004. This in turn led to the crisis involving the US
Woman's Olympic Team.

How can we agree to merge with and give seats on our board to an
unreliable business partner? This seems to be one of those half-baked
ideas which will prove unworkable in practice. Your proposal (most of
which I have snipped) involves a major corporate reorganization which
would be almost impossible to accomplish legally.

Sam Sloan
I am also a candidate for USCF Executive Board.
Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Proposal Goran Tomic rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 14 June 18th 04 08:29 PM
AF4C Proposal WPraeder rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 22 June 14th 04 12:47 AM
A modest proposal for the electronic rating supplements Bill Smythe rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 5 May 24th 04 04:31 PM
A proposal similar to Fischer's idea: turn off opening books. Alberich rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 9 November 14th 03 05:47 PM
Tim's Dues Proposal. Will it Fly? Bruce Draney rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 50 September 2nd 03 01:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 ChessBanter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Compare - Mortgage Calculator - Mortgage - Home Loan - Car Insurance