![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: adams, before, day, equalized, rest, tomorrow |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
My guess is that it's a novelty gone wrong, but it makes for an exciting
match! |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"PeteCasso" wrote in message ... My guess is that it's a novelty gone wrong, but it makes for an exciting match! Adams wound up in a 2 pawn-up endgame in round 3, with both sides having Q=R and pawns. He won.Phil |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, yes, I followed the game, as I think many of us here do. What I meant
to say though, is that the underlying cause of the loss of Kasimdzhanov was him introducing an opening novelty that backfired. That may explain the somewhat lopsided course of the game. "Chess One" wrote in message news ![]() "PeteCasso" wrote in message ... My guess is that it's a novelty gone wrong, but it makes for an exciting match! Adams wound up in a 2 pawn-up endgame in round 3, with both sides having Q=R and pawns. He won.Phil |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I just looked at the comment on the chessbase web site and it looks as if it
is Adams who was successful with an opening novelty, 10.Qb2 and subsequent fianchetto of the Queen's Bishop, and Kasimdzhanov then couldn't find a proper plan for the entire game. "PeteCasso" wrote in message ... Well, yes, I followed the game, as I think many of us here do. What I meant to say though, is that the underlying cause of the loss of Kasimdzhanov was him introducing an opening novelty that backfired. That may explain the somewhat lopsided course of the game. "Chess One" wrote in message news ![]() "PeteCasso" wrote in message ... My guess is that it's a novelty gone wrong, but it makes for an exciting match! Adams wound up in a 2 pawn-up endgame in round 3, with both sides having Q=R and pawns. He won.Phil |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oops, it is 10.Qd2 and also getting late or early morning ...
"PeteCasso" wrote in message ... I just looked at the comment on the chessbase web site and it looks as if it is Adams who was successful with an opening novelty, 10.Qb2 and subsequent fianchetto of the Queen's Bishop, and Kasimdzhanov then couldn't find a proper plan for the entire game. "PeteCasso" wrote in message ... Well, yes, I followed the game, as I think many of us here do. What I meant to say though, is that the underlying cause of the loss of Kasimdzhanov was him introducing an opening novelty that backfired. That may explain the somewhat lopsided course of the game. "Chess One" wrote in message news ![]() "PeteCasso" wrote in message ... My guess is that it's a novelty gone wrong, but it makes for an exciting match! Adams wound up in a 2 pawn-up endgame in round 3, with both sides having Q=R and pawns. He won.Phil |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Adams proves why garbage openings ruin title chances | Oliver Maas | rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) | 1 | July 15th 04 11:22 AM |
| Topalov out: will Adams win? | Isidor Gunsberg | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 2 | July 8th 04 10:22 PM |
| IM Silman Rest of World match | Tryfon Gavriel | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 5 | March 16th 04 03:05 PM |
| Mcnabs Carbuncle.. | michael adams | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 12 | February 27th 04 07:21 AM |
| IM Jeremy Silman vs. Rest of World match | Tryfon Gavriel | rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) | 4 | January 6th 04 07:50 PM |