![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: adams, chances, garbage, openings, proves, ruin, title |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Overall, I got the impression that K was playing the half hour chess game as
a half hour chess game, i.e. tailored to reality, whereas A was trying to play the half hour chess game as a classical chess game, i.e. not tailored to reality. Therefore, A had a winning position and would have certainly won under regular time control. But K got practical chances that A did not take into account in his attempt to play classical chess, and at the end, K won, I would say, deservedly so. "Chess One" wrote in message ... "Ray Gordon" wrote in message ... he plays, as white: 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 We'll hear about how the system is "playable," but the fact is, 3. d4 is "theory" for a reason: it's the OBVIOUSLY BEST MOVE. He just handed equality to Black at MOVE THREE. In top level games, the player who deviates from the best theory first usually loses. This game is yet another example. I note that in the middle game Adams was exchange and a passed pawn up. He did not find the right line to simplify into an ending while maintaining an advantage in material or initiative, whereas his opponent did exactly the right thing, he 'complicated' seeking counter chances and found them. Given a respectable time frame in which to play the game his opponent might even have resigned at move 24 as hopelessly behind. In a fast game he did the right thing and Adams lost the thread of it, and succumbed to a cheapo. The scandal is that this is a purportedly a world quality chess tournament which is organised so as to produce results like a who-cares game in a coffee-shop. Phil Innes Adams was trying to cheat theory with a simple move that leads to relatively simple (but weak) lines for white. He lost, as he deserved to. -- "I ain't gonna play Sun City" and the world's best chessplayers should not play Libya, which banned the Israeli players from competing. Shame on the Americans who went! Everything you need to know about women. FREE! http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html The Seduction Library http://www.cybersheet.com/hotties.html Why Hotties Choose Losers http://www.cybersheet.com/6/ubb.x The Seduction Library Forum My IRC chat channel: freenode.net #seduction |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
PeteCasso wrote:
Overall, I got the impression that K was playing the half hour chess game as a half hour chess game, i.e. tailored to reality, whereas A was trying to play the half hour chess game as a classical chess game, i.e. not tailored to reality. Therefore, A had a winning position and would have certainly won under regular time control. But K got practical chances that A did not take into account in his attempt to play classical chess, and at the end, K won, I would say, deservedly so. Yep, I agree with this - Kazim. is the deserved winner under these circs. the title may be meaningless, the money in his bank acct. on the other hand looks not to bad at all.. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Adams proves why garbage openings ruin title chances | Peter Rhodes | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 1 | July 19th 04 01:23 AM |
| Adams proves why garbage openings ruin title chances | Doctor SBD | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 17 | July 16th 04 08:25 AM |
| Adams proves why garbage openings ruin title chances | Oliver Maas | rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) | 1 | July 15th 04 11:22 AM |
| Adams proves why garbage openings ruin title chances | Oliver Maas | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 1 | July 15th 04 11:22 AM |