A Chess forum. ChessBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ChessBanter forum » Chess Newsgroups » rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , , ,

US Hypocrites: "Polgars had Fischer at their house. So?"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 9th 04, 10:58 PM
Nick
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default US Hypocrites: "Polgars had Fischer at their house. So?"

Claudia wrote in message
...(to ):
wrote:
So it's OK to selectively prosecute based on whether someone expresses
unpopular opinions? What happened to equal protection under the law
and unbiased jurisprudence?


I didn't say that at all. But seriously, when during the last 50 years
did the US ever tolerate unpopular opinions?
(snipped)


Unlike in Germany, for instance, extremely 'unpopular opinions' such as
neo-Nazi 'hate speech' seem more or less legally protected in the United
States by the US Constitution. A neo-Nazi may freely express in the
United States something that would be considered criminal in Germany.

But Claudia seems right in observing that the United States has been less
tolerant of unpopular opinions, particularly when expressed by members of
minority communities, than most 'patriotically correct' Americans would
like to believe about their beloved country.

In the chess newsgroups, particularly in rec.games.chess.politics
(which has long been a de facto United States political newsgroup),
many, if not most, of the American writers seem quite intolerant
of any criticisms (even when they have been made by carefully citing
some well-respected American sources) of the United States.

"I find the intolerance of differing opinions here disturbing.
The citizens of the U.S. do not have a monopoly on the truth but
from external appearances it seems like most of them think they do.
Before you ask, I am an American citizen but this does not change my opinion."
--David Bohm (5 August 2004, in rec.games.chess.politics)

--Nick
Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
US Hypocrites: "Polgars had Fischer at their house. So?" invalid@example.com rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 2 August 9th 04 10:58 PM
US Hypocrites: "Polgars had Fischer at their house. So?" Fifiela rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 28 August 8th 04 01:48 AM
US Hypocrites: "Polgars had Fischer at their house. So?" banana rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 0 August 7th 04 10:19 AM
Fischer -new appeal, refugee claim, 1st asylum offer (press release) banana rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 6 August 5th 04 03:07 AM
US Hypocrites: "Polgars had Fischer at their house. So?" Nick rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 4 August 3rd 04 07:20 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 ChessBanter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Mortgage Loans - Mortgage - Super Mario Bros Music - Free Advertising - Debt Management