"John Macnab" wrote in message
. ca...
Tell you what, Jason. Why don't we both contact Shaw and make a
complaint. You can use my name as I post it here; I'll mention your
previous comments about how they are too cowardly to cut you off. OK?

It is obvious that you are a snivelling coward "John", and a total loser! I
know that a weasel like you is probabably used to getting beaten up your
entire life. Since you live in Western Canada I would suggest that we meet
and settle this like men, but you are not a man, you are nothing more than a
snivelling little coward that antagonizes others and runs away like a cry
baby latter.






I think that 1. f4 is a decent first move and still affords white some
objective advantage, and certainly some novelty value in many cases.
John


Dr. Robert Faurisson wrote:
"John Macnab" wrote in message
. ca...

Sorry I took the bait.

John


"bait" for you is probably a young boy whos parents have looked the
other
way.

This forum is for chess analysis jackass. Continue to harrass and post
off-topic like the loser Houlsby and I will report the abuse to your
ISP.

For a chess analysis related topic.....What is so good about the
Caro-Kann???

Dr. Robert Faurisson wrote:

Shaw is not too "cowardly" to cut people off. They will likely cut you off
Macnab, for the chronic harrassment you are doing. My posts on the other
hand are legitimate for the newsgroup. Feel free to send shaw as many
complaints as you like!

Go for it Bob! I think it's really interesting that a 'revisionist' like
yourself & a 'wuse' like Macnab should get embroiled in a Shaw-server
issue. Really points up ongoing usenet small-mindedness, think ye not?.

BTW, I don't think you know much caro-khan, also 1. (f4) is a joke..

I could play the "Hammershling" ( I know the spelling is probably
wrong....1.f3 2.Kf3) and beat you every game "michael adams". You don't even
know enough to name yourself after a good player like Kasp, Kram,Annand etc.


"michael adams" wrote in message
...
Dr. Robert Faurisson wrote:

Shaw is not too "cowardly" to cut people off. They will likely cut you
off
Macnab, for the chronic harrassment you are doing. My posts on the other
hand are legitimate for the newsgroup. Feel free to send shaw as many
complaints as you like!

Go for it Bob! I think it's really interesting that a 'revisionist' like
yourself & a 'wuse' like Macnab should get embroiled in a Shaw-server
issue. Really points up ongoing usenet small-mindedness, think ye not?.

BTW, I don't think you know much caro-khan, also 1. (f4) is a joke..

correction 1. f3 2. Kf2


"Dr. Robert Faurisson" wrote in
message . ca...
I could play the "Hammershling" ( I know the spelling is probably
wrong....1.f3 2.Kf3) and beat you every game "michael adams". You don't
even
know enough to name yourself after a good player like Kasp, Kram,Annand
etc.


"michael adams" wrote in message
...
Dr. Robert Faurisson wrote:

Shaw is not too "cowardly" to cut people off. They will likely cut you
off
Macnab, for the chronic harrassment you are doing. My posts on the
other
hand are legitimate for the newsgroup. Feel free to send shaw as many
complaints as you like!

Go for it Bob! I think it's really interesting that a 'revisionist' like
yourself & a 'wuse' like Macnab should get embroiled in a Shaw-server
issue. Really points up ongoing usenet small-mindedness, think ye not?.

BTW, I don't think you know much caro-khan, also 1. (f4) is a joke..

Jason,

This is amusing, even for you. You make three accusations:

1. I am a "liar".
2. I am a "snivelling coward".
3. I am engaged in "chronic harrassment."

And you offer to settle this "like a man". I can only imagine what your
conception of a man is...

It's time to put up or shut up. Provide *any* evidence of points 1-3.

It's your move, revisionist boy.

John

1. e4


Dr. Robert Faurisson wrote:
Shaw is not too "cowardly" to cut people off. They will likely cut you off
Macnab, for the chronic harrassment you are doing. My posts on the other
hand are legitimate for the newsgroup. Feel free to send shaw as many
complaints as you like!

"Dr. Robert Faurisson" wrote in
message . ca...

"John Macnab" wrote in message
w.ca...

Tell you what, Jason. Why don't we both contact Shaw and make a
complaint. You can use my name as I post it here; I'll mention your
previous comments about how they are too cowardly to cut you off. OK?

It is obvious that you are a snivelling coward "John", and a total loser!

I

know that a weasel like you is probabably used to getting beaten up your
entire life. Since you live in Western Canada I would suggest that we meet
and settle this like men, but you are not a man, you are nothing more than

a

snivelling little coward that antagonizes others and runs away like a cry
baby latter.






I think that 1. f4 is a decent first move and still affords white some
objective advantage, and certainly some novelty value in many cases.

John


Dr. Robert Faurisson wrote:

"John Macnab" wrote in message
haw.ca...


Sorry I took the bait.

John


"bait" for you is probably a young boy whos parents have looked the

other

way.

This forum is for chess analysis jackass. Continue to harrass and post
off-topic like the loser Houlsby and I will report the abuse to your

ISP.

For a chess analysis related topic.....What is so good about the
Caro-Kann???

I guess the Caro-Kann is flexible...what do others think?

No problem. Caissa's Web at http://caissa.com. It has been around
for years, it is much easier to use than any of the sites often
mentioned here (letsplay, redhot etc), the interface is simple,
uncluttered and professionally designed, and it is professionally
managed. Much better and more features than the other sites and it is
always available. I've been there for over 4 years, have tried the
other sites and have no intention of changing.



"redbloke" wrote in message ...

If you can direct me to a more well run, active, sociable, friendly, helpful
and enjoyable site