On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 04:53:26 GMT, "Randy Bauer"
wrote:


"Don C. Aldrich" wrote in message
.. .
God help me, I actually read something posted on Sam's site, in
particular the decision handed down by the court.

Essentially, the judge tossed Sam's suit for failure to follow proper
procedure. Imagine that. While it is without prejudice, meaning he
can come back, he also included this paragraph:

"Based on the complex nature of the issues involved, this Court
requires, pursuant to CPLR §1101(b), that this movant submit a
certificate of an attorney stating that the attorney has examined the
action and believes there is merit to the moving party's contentions.
The attorney should address issues such as standing and the
appropriateness of the remedies requested (including the issuance of
an injunction against an official of another state)."

These are sufficiently complex issues that no lawyer worth his salt
would file such an affidavit without some significant research.
Hopefully, none of my brothers in the NY bar will assist the looney,
and this will be a dead issue.

There is justice.

==Dondo

I know Attorney Don Aldrich. Attorney Don Aldrich is a friend of mine. Sam
Sloan is no Don Aldrich.

Randy Bauer

Dumbo, who claims to be a lawyer, and a good one at that, is wrong
again.

Remember that he claimed that I would lose my case against the Taxi
and Limousine Commission, but I won that case.

Here again, he claimed that my case had been thrown out of court, but
as everybody can see now, my case is going strong with a hearing
scheduled for November 30.

Is Dumbo/Dondo really a lawyer and is he really a good one?

It was not rocket science to see that I had a legally sound case.

Sam Sloan

"Sam Sloan" wrote in message
...

Remember that he claimed that I would lose my case against the Taxi
and Limousine Commission, but I won that case.

Curious that you never drove a cab again after your "win".

"Sam Sloan" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 04:53:26 GMT, "Randy Bauer"
wrote:


"Don C. Aldrich" wrote in message
. ..
God help me, I actually read something posted on Sam's site, in
particular the decision handed down by the court.

Essentially, the judge tossed Sam's suit for failure to follow proper
procedure. Imagine that. While it is without prejudice, meaning he
can come back, he also included this paragraph:

"Based on the complex nature of the issues involved, this Court
requires, pursuant to CPLR §1101(b), that this movant submit a
certificate of an attorney stating that the attorney has examined the
action and believes there is merit to the moving party's contentions.
The attorney should address issues such as standing and the
appropriateness of the remedies requested (including the issuance of
an injunction against an official of another state)."

These are sufficiently complex issues that no lawyer worth his salt
would file such an affidavit without some significant research.
Hopefully, none of my brothers in the NY bar will assist the looney,
and this will be a dead issue.

There is justice.

==Dondo

I know Attorney Don Aldrich. Attorney Don Aldrich is a friend of mine.
Sam
Sloan is no Don Aldrich.

Randy Bauer

Dumbo, who claims to be a lawyer, and a good one at that, is wrong
again.

Remember that he claimed that I would lose my case against the Taxi
and Limousine Commission, but I won that case.

Here again, he claimed that my case had been thrown out of court, but
as everybody can see now, my case is going strong with a hearing
scheduled for November 30.

Is Dumbo/Dondo really a lawyer and is he really a good one?

It was not rocket science to see that I had a legally sound case.

Sam Sloan

You're a long way from proving anything, other than that you could scrounge
up enough chumps to post your $300 and prove Abe Lincoln right about
foolery.

Randy Bauer

StanB wrote:
"Sam Sloan" wrote in message
...

Remember that he claimed that I would lose my case against the Taxi
and Limousine Commission, but I won that case.

Curious that you never drove a cab again after your "win".

Must have been one of dem moral victories!

(Sam Sloan) wrote in message ...
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 04:53:26 GMT, "Randy Bauer"
wrote:


"Don C. Aldrich" wrote in message
.. .
God help me, I actually read something posted on Sam's site, in
particular the decision handed down by the court.

Essentially, the judge tossed Sam's suit for failure to follow proper
procedure. Imagine that. While it is without prejudice, meaning he
can come back, he also included this paragraph:

"Based on the complex nature of the issues involved, this Court
requires, pursuant to CPLR §1101(b), that this movant submit a
certificate of an attorney stating that the attorney has examined the
action and believes there is merit to the moving party's contentions.
The attorney should address issues such as standing and the
appropriateness of the remedies requested (including the issuance of
an injunction against an official of another state)."

These are sufficiently complex issues that no lawyer worth his salt
would file such an affidavit without some significant research.
Hopefully, none of my brothers in the NY bar will assist the looney,
and this will be a dead issue.

There is justice.

==Dondo

I know Attorney Don Aldrich. Attorney Don Aldrich is a friend of mine. Sam
Sloan is no Don Aldrich.

Randy Bauer

Dumbo, who claims to be a lawyer, and a good one at that, is wrong
again.

Remember that he claimed that I would lose my case against the Taxi
and Limousine Commission, but I won that case.

Actually, he pointed out you had lied in an affidavit.

(Sam Sloan) wrote in message ...
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 20:31:38 -0500, "StanB"
wrote:


"Sam Sloan" wrote in message
...

That is not what the judge wrote at all. He wrote that I must either
pay the $305 filing fee or provide an affidavit from an attorney, but
not both.

Since you have neither I guess it's all so much **** for the birds.

Dumbkoff.

Poor Sam, he makes reference to himself.

Stan is wrong, as usual. I paid the $305 filing fee on Friday.

Sam Sloan

Care to tell us who your puppetmaster is? Who is funding this suit?

On 20 Nov 2004 09:20:52 -0800, (Spam Scone)
wrote:

(Sam Sloan) wrote in message ...
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 20:31:38 -0500, "StanB"
wrote:


"Sam Sloan" wrote in message
...

That is not what the judge wrote at all. He wrote that I must either
pay the $305 filing fee or provide an affidavit from an attorney, but
not both.

Since you have neither I guess it's all so much **** for the birds.

Dumbkoff.

Poor Sam, he makes reference to himself.

Stan is wrong, as usual. I paid the $305 filing fee on Friday.

Sam Sloan

Care to tell us who your puppetmaster is? Who is funding this suit?

Nobody is my puppetmaster. I did all the legal research and wrote the
whole thing myself.

I am surprised that you do not realize this. Everybody else does.

Sam Sloan

"Sam Sloan" wrote in message
...

Nobody is my puppetmaster. I did all the legal research and wrote the
whole thing myself.

That was patently obvious.

Why bother?


On 11/20/04 11:41 AM, in article , "Sam
Sloan" wrote:

On 20 Nov 2004 09:20:52 -0800, (Spam Scone)
wrote:

(Sam Sloan) wrote in message
...
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 20:31:38 -0500, "StanB"
wrote:


"Sam Sloan" wrote in message
...

That is not what the judge wrote at all. He wrote that I must either
pay the $305 filing fee or provide an affidavit from an attorney, but
not both.

Since you have neither I guess it's all so much **** for the birds.

Dumbkoff.

Poor Sam, he makes reference to himself.

Stan is wrong, as usual. I paid the $305 filing fee on Friday.

Sam Sloan

Care to tell us who your puppetmaster is? Who is funding this suit?

Nobody is my puppetmaster. I did all the legal research and wrote the
whole thing myself.

I am surprised that you do not realize this. Everybody else does.

Sam Sloan

I'm going to hate myself in the morning for this, I just know it.
Posting yet again to a Sloan thread.

Sam, you are such an idiot. It is criminal that the likes of you is
about to cost our federation money due to your insane view of the
world.

An 'order to show cause' is not a victory. It is nothing more than a
notice of motion. That you had to do it twice does not bode well for
your success.

I am confident you will not survive the hearing with your case in
tact. The only question is whether you will be appropriately
sanctioned for your actions in bad faith.

==Dondo