A Chess forum. ChessBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ChessBanter forum » Chess Newsgroups » rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , ,

Sloan Suit tossed



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old November 22nd 04, 08:49 AM
Parrthenon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

And you seriously question why I don't respond to your claptrap anymore? The
guy who has elevated school yard name calling into self deluded sophistry? You
know, once you did write about ideas. It is tragic to see a once sharp wit
deteriorate so completely. -- Dondo

When have I ever wondered why Don Aldrich does not "respond" to my "claptrap?"

For the sake of argument, I can accept that I write claptrap and that my wits
are a particularly viscous suet pudding. But I do not question why Mr. Aldrich
refuses to respond.

I already know the answer to that one.

And why is the man so upset? I merely wrote that his postings here suggest
that he is more a solicitor than a barrister.

We live in a time of rgcp love. We were supposed to stick daisies in the
rhetorcial gun barrels. I thought we had reached our own Woodstock. I am
disillusioned.

I'm going to hate myself in the morning for this, I just know it. Posting
yet again to a Sloan thread. Sam, you are such an idiot. It is criminal
that the likes of you is about to cost our federation money due to your insane
view of the world. Dondo

Writes Don Aldrich, "I'm going to hate myself in the morning for this."

The devil made me do it, ma. The devil made me do it.

Our jailhouse lawyers will not decide this case. A judge, who is far
removed from the hatreds and jealousies of rgcp, will render a decision.

Sam's case has evident merit. The issue will be whether a judge will
overturn a major organizational decision -- a horrendous intervention and
enormous sanction -- based on the Board violating its own bylaws. The odds are
against Sam's case, but the fact of bylaws violation has created enough
uncertainty that members of the inner circle are unsure of the outcome.

__________________________________________________ ______________
"FIDE has made its decision. Players who refuse to be drug tested will not be
able to play chess." -- Dr. Press, co-founder of the FIDE Medical Commission.
Ads
  #22  
Old November 22nd 04, 10:44 AM
Sam Sloan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 23:17:31 -0600, Don C. Aldrich
wrote:

I'm going to hate myself in the morning for this, I just know it.
Posting yet again to a Sloan thread.

Sam, you are such an idiot. It is criminal that the likes of you is
about to cost our federation money due to your insane view of the
world.

An 'order to show cause' is not a victory. It is nothing more than a
notice of motion. That you had to do it twice does not bode well for
your success.

I am confident you will not survive the hearing with your case in
tact. The only question is whether you will be appropriately
sanctioned for your actions in bad faith.

==Dondo


Please note Dondo's mixed-up view of the world.

In the first place, he calls this a "Sloan thread". As anybody can
see, this is not a Sloan thread. This is a Dondo thread. Go look at
the top. Dondo started this thread.

Secondly, he claims that the Sloan suit has been tossed. It has not
been tossed. It is going stronger than ever.

Thirdly, an order to show cause is not a notice of motion., I have to
wonder if Dondo is really the lawyer he claims to be. Before the judge
signed the order, he reviewed it for legality. By the way, the judge's
law clerk is an author of law books, which is rare and unusual.

Fourthly, it is Dondo who is costing the federation money by
expressing views about New York Law when he is not licensed to
practice in New York, which will lead his political allies to have a
false sense of security and indeed arrogance which will cause them to
fall a lot harder if and when I win this case.

Sam Sloan
  #23  
Old November 24th 04, 05:49 AM
Good Moves aren't worth BEANS ......
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Aldrich, it figures that a fat whining crybaby like you would have an axe to
grind with Sam Sloan, who is one of the best contributors of information in
this chess usenet.

By the way, have you stopped crying about that beating I gave you in the
Canadian Open? I've been waiting to give you a few more ass kickings, but
you don't come back to Winnipeg to play chess anymore. I guess you're tired
of donating rating points.

Someone once said: "pawn sacs are for wimps...real men sac pieces".
Interesting, considering how you sac'd a pawn in our game (from's gambit),
and I went on to sacrifice a knight for an attack against the black king.

Now Aldrich, who was it who said that bit about sacrifices again?

Jason Repa





"Don C. Aldrich" wrote in message
...
God help me, I actually read something posted on Sam's site, in
particular the decision handed down by the court.

Essentially, the judge tossed Sam's suit for failure to follow proper
procedure. Imagine that. While it is without prejudice, meaning he
can come back, he also included this paragraph:

"Based on the complex nature of the issues involved, this Court
requires, pursuant to CPLR §1101(b), that this movant submit a
certificate of an attorney stating that the attorney has examined the
action and believes there is merit to the moving party's contentions.
The attorney should address issues such as standing and the
appropriateness of the remedies requested (including the issuance of
an injunction against an official of another state)."

These are sufficiently complex issues that no lawyer worth his salt
would file such an affidavit without some significant research.
Hopefully, none of my brothers in the NY bar will assist the looney,
and this will be a dead issue.

There is justice.

==Dondo



  #24  
Old November 24th 04, 05:58 AM
ESchember
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Someone once said: "pawn sacs are for wimps...real men sac pieces".
Interesting, considering how you sac'd a pawn in our game (from's gambit),
and I went on to sacrifice a knight for an attack against the black king.

Now Aldrich, who was it who said that bit about sacrifices again?

Jason Repa"

Repa..you remind me of Mother Teresa..






  #25  
Old November 24th 04, 08:29 AM
Fifiela
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jason Repa

Must be a Full Moon....
  #26  
Old November 24th 04, 02:26 PM
The Jury is still out on that!
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I never claimed to be "Mother Teresa. But I do tell it like it is. That's
alot more than can be said for a snivelling little piece of **** punk like
you.

Jason Repa



"ESchember" wrote in message
...
"Someone once said: "pawn sacs are for wimps...real men sac pieces".
Interesting, considering how you sac'd a pawn in our game (from's gambit),
and I went on to sacrifice a knight for an attack against the black king.

Now Aldrich, who was it who said that bit about sacrifices again?

Jason Repa"

Repa..you remind me of Mother Teresa..








  #27  
Old November 24th 04, 02:27 PM
The Jury is still out on that!
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Fifiela" wrote in message
...
Jason Repa

Must be a Full Moon....





Nope, ran out of Prozac!

Jason (the troll buster) Repa


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sam Sloan DNA test results are back Sam Sloan rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 3 November 14th 03 05:24 AM
Crossville, TN Crossville Chess rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 184 October 27th 03 12:33 AM
Eade's Libel Charge vs. Sloan Parrthenon rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 2 October 14th 03 03:46 AM
Eade's Libel Charge vs. Sloan Parrthenon rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 0 October 13th 03 04:55 PM
Astronomers Discover Planet Sloan. Bruce Draney rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 1 September 7th 03 09:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 ChessBanter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Free File Hosting - Free Credit Reports - 3dge Viral Emails - Cheap Loan - Cell Phone