"ASCACHESS" wrote in message
...
One of the issues with accepting the validity of this is I
don't recall any disclosure of who these people are, what their
relationship
to Calchess is, and how plans to "return the money" have been developed.
Of
course, how these people have the authority to make this determination is
another issue, but just a little sunshine directed on these stewards of
other people's money would be good.

Randy Bauer


These political morons tried to have me arrested, but deliberately omitted
details to the police which proved me innocent.
The authorities have full knowledge of who, where, and now, why.

You will forgive me if I don't choose to share with you since you are
sitting
on the same board as the batty yet dictatorial Mrs. Shaughnessy.

Have you shared it with anybody? Don't you think it's a fair question?
Again, as one who has not taken sides in this dispute, I'd just like to get
a better understanding of what is transpiring.

Randy Bauer

There was no theft.

ROFLMAO....

wrote:
I have an idea.
Lets just let Sam organize the SSCF.(Sam Sloan Chess Federation) He
can have his own bylaws, file his own paperwork do his own taxes,
organize his own championships, publish his own chess magazine,
coordinate with FIDE. He could also charge his own dues. I bet Bobby
Fischer would even become the second member, Sam being the
first.grin
Rob

I might buy that magazine. He does write well and entertainingly. It may
be full of untruths and self-serving stories about how he blew up the Death
Star but it might be more worth my time than Chess Life.

There was no theft.

ROFLMAO....


Idiot.
OK, who was robbed?
How much of that money came from you in any form?
Have you no understanding that it was the children who were being
systematically cheated?
We sent off another check today to someone requesting a refund.
Should we not have given those who were cheated their money back? Should we
have sent that money back to the spendthrift Shaughnessy so she can give it to
her minions?
Should we encourage people who cheat in elections?
I will be more than a little pleased to have this get to court.

Sheesh
Richard Peterson

Have you shared it with anybody? Don't you think it's a fair question?
Again, as one who has not taken sides in this dispute, I'd just like to get
a better understanding of what is transpiring.

Randy Bauer

Didn't you read what I wrote?
Perhaps I was not clear when I wrote,
"The authorities have full knowledge of who, where, and now, why."

The trustees know who they are.
None are related to me in any way nor have any of them ever worked for me nor I
for them.
The authorities know who all of them are.
They are honest folk who have an honest job to do, but at the same time it have
kids under their authority who were cheated.

Clear enough for you?

Rp

Rp

"ASCACHESS" wrote in message
...
Have you shared it with anybody? Don't you think it's a fair question?
Again, as one who has not taken sides in this dispute, I'd just like to
get
a better understanding of what is transpiring.

Randy Bauer

Didn't you read what I wrote?
Perhaps I was not clear when I wrote,
"The authorities have full knowledge of who, where, and now, why."

Can you understand why simply writing something may not be sufficient
comfort for some, even disinterested parties? Now, providing a name or the
support of even anybody else on this newsgroup that your version is correct
might get closer to corroboration.

The trustees know who they are.
None are related to me in any way nor have any of them ever worked for me
nor I
for them.
The authorities know who all of them are.
They are honest folk who have an honest job to do, but at the same time it
have
kids under their authority who were cheated.

Clear enough for you?

In a word, no, because it relies on facts not in evidence. Can you give me
the name of "the authorities" who know? Evidence that "the trustees" know
who they are? I'd be happy to make a simple phone call or email to them to
get some independent verification. Is it that much to ask?

Randy Bauer

In a word, no, because it relies on facts not in evidence. Can you give me
the name of "the authorities" who know? Evidence that "the trustees" know
who they are? I'd be happy to make a simple phone call or email to them to
get some independent verification. Is it that much to ask?

Randy Bauer


Yes. It is too much.

We will just have to agree that you are not one of the people in the inner
loop.
Your curiosity will not trump what is happening in court.
All will come out.

Rp

In article , ASCACHESS says...

In a word, no, because it relies on facts not in evidence. Can you give me
the name of "the authorities" who know? Evidence that "the trustees" know
who they are? I'd be happy to make a simple phone call or email to them to
get some independent verification. Is it that much to ask?

Randy Bauer


Yes. It is too much.

We will just have to agree that you are not one of the people in the inner
loop.
Your curiosity will not trump what is happening in court.
All will come out.

Rp

Which court? When will it come out?

Randy Bauer

"Fifiela" wrote in message
...
Which court? When will it come out?

Ummmm, Randy. You're not going to get a straight answer. Give it up and
draw
the obvious conclusion.

Best,
Allan

Yeah....it's really amazing, too. RP demands straight answers from the USCF
EB, but when someone inquires about his own "situation" he ducks the
question. Now, this could be understood if it was just a personal problem
of his, but he brought it to RGCP, for God's sake, and now doesn't want to
finish the story. He must be one of those kinds of people who tell a joke
and then keeps the punch line to himself.

I don't claim to know the in's and out's of this predicament the way you do,
Allan, but from an outsider's perspective I can tell you that RP's silence
and evasion on this subject make him look guilty as hell.

Regards,

Matt

"Matt Nemmers" wrote in message
news:ftJrd.126033$V41.62400@attbi_s52...(to Rob Mitchell):
wrote in message
oups.com...
I am just teasing and not trying to pick a fight.

Then you're out of your depth.
You should never tease on RGCP unless you're willing to fight.

Marc Antony: When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept:
Ambition should be made of sterner stuff.
--William Shakespeare (Julius Caesar)

--Nick