I don't claim to know the in's and out's of this predicament the way you
do, Allan, but from an outsider's perspective I can tell you that RP's
silence and evasion on this subject make him look guilty as hell.

I asked RP a number of questions he felt unable to answer. Previously I did
not have a settled opinion concerning a history of his claims contra-USCF,
afterwards it is still less certain.

I cannot quite agree with Matt about 'guilt' but RP does seem to have the
same desease which he complains exists in others.

Perhaps this means that everyone is a bit guilty? Or another conclusion is
that the system of chess management in which we operate will inevitably and
frequently produce these results.

Phil Innes


Regards,

Matt

"Matt Nemmers" wrote in message
news:MBord.427677$wV.214563@attbi_s54...
Does anyone else find it truly amazing that somebody like Sam Sloan --
somebody who can't even manage his own life, care for his own children
(legitimate or otherwise), or hold down a steady (and legal) job, and
somebody who has been soundly thrashed for every single office for which
he's ever run, including the USCF Executive Board (numerous times) --
thinks
that HE knows how to run the United States Chess Federation better than
it's
duly elected officials? He's not on the inside, nobody worth their salt
trusts him, nobody who supplies him with information has access to any
more
accurate sources than any other member who does their homework, and the
guy
STILL continues his exercises in futility.

What a ****ing imbecile.

Regards,

Matt

Matt, It sounds like your jealous of Sam cause you didn't think of it first.
Leopold

"Leopold" wrote in message
...

Matt, It sounds like your jealous of Sam cause you didn't think of it
first.
Leopold

Leopold, it sounds like you have a lot to read and even more to learn.

MN