A Chess forum. ChessBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ChessBanter forum » Chess Newsgroups » rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , ,

Sloan vs. USCF: Amazing



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 1st 04, 08:05 PM
Matt Nemmers
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sloan vs. USCF: Amazing

Does anyone else find it truly amazing that somebody like Sam Sloan --
somebody who can't even manage his own life, care for his own children
(legitimate or otherwise), or hold down a steady (and legal) job, and
somebody who has been soundly thrashed for every single office for which
he's ever run, including the USCF Executive Board (numerous times) -- thinks
that HE knows how to run the United States Chess Federation better than it's
duly elected officials? He's not on the inside, nobody worth their salt
trusts him, nobody who supplies him with information has access to any more
accurate sources than any other member who does their homework, and the guy
STILL continues his exercises in futility.

What a ****ing imbecile.

Regards,

Matt


Ads
  #2  
Old December 1st 04, 08:15 PM
Jud McCranie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 19:05:16 GMT, "Matt Nemmers"
wrote:

What a ****ing imbecile.


He's not an imbecile. On his website he shows how he is smarter than
Einstein. :-)

---
Replace you know what by j to email
  #3  
Old December 1st 04, 10:33 PM
ASCACHESS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Does anyone else find it truly amazing that somebody like Sam Sloan --
somebody who can't even manage his own life, care for his own children
(legitimate or otherwise), or hold down a steady (and legal) job, and
somebody who has been soundly thrashed for every single office for
which
he's ever run, including the USCF Executive Board (numerous times) -- thinks
that HE knows how to run the United States Chess Federation better than it's
duly elected officials?


This is unintentionally funny.

Let's see. Sam Sloan or USCF's duly elected officials.

Considering the history of the later, it is just about a pickem.

Matt continues to prove that he is new.

Richard Peterson
  #5  
Old December 2nd 04, 12:46 AM
David Ames
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Matt Nemmers" wrote in message news:MBord.427677$wV.214563@attbi_s54...
Does anyone else find it truly amazing that somebody like Sam Sloan --
somebody who can't even manage his own life, care for his own children
(legitimate or otherwise), or hold down a steady (and legal) job, and
somebody who has been soundly thrashed for every single office for which
he's ever run, including the USCF Executive Board (numerous times) -- thinks
that HE knows how to run the United States Chess Federation better than it's
duly elected officials? He's not on the inside, nobody worth their salt
trusts him, nobody who supplies him with information has access to any more
accurate sources than any other member who does their homework, and the guy
STILL continues his exercises in futility.

What a ****ing imbecile.


Ever hear the expression "Speak for yourself"?


Regards,

Matt


Sam Sloan evidently knows New York law better than the entire
Executive Board, better than the lawyer and the real estate broker
USCF used to "sell" their building. And for this you call him an
imbecile? Clearly you've got some kind of problem, and you're trying
to make your problem his.

David Ames
  #6  
Old December 2nd 04, 01:03 AM
StanB
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"David Ames" wrote in message
om...

Sam Sloan evidently knows New York law better than the entire
Executive Board, better than the lawyer and the real estate broker
USCF used to "sell" their building. And for this you call him an
imbecile? Clearly you've got some kind of problem, and you're trying
to make your problem his.


I'm not so sure he did. Your hero is a ne'er-do-well who has never succeeded
at anything other than the exploitation of foreign born women.


  #7  
Old December 2nd 04, 01:26 AM
ASCACHESS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Clearly you've got some kind of problem, and you're trying
to make your problem his.


I'm not so sure he did. Your hero is a ne'er-do-well who has never succeeded
at anything other than the exploitation of foreign born women.


But let's give him his due. Who thought he would get this far.
By the way, your reference to his exploitation of foreign born women begs the
questions of whether there is substance to his lawsuit.

This is like quarreling over whether a certain former USCF President is the
biggest liar that ever walked the earth OR whether he has on an ugly tie.
Both may be true, but sure one is more significant.

Rp



  #8  
Old December 2nd 04, 02:17 AM
StanB
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"ASCACHESS" wrote in message
...

I'm not so sure he did. Your hero is a ne'er-do-well who has never
succeeded
at anything other than the exploitation of foreign born women.


But let's give him his due. Who thought he would get this far.
By the way, your reference to his exploitation of foreign born women begs
the
questions of whether there is substance to his lawsuit.

This is like quarreling over whether a certain former USCF President is
the
biggest liar that ever walked the earth OR whether he has on an ugly tie.
Both may be true, but sure one is more significant.


It is the only thing he has any demonstrated success at. Do you know of
anything else?


  #9  
Old December 2nd 04, 05:10 AM
Matt Nemmers
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"David Ames" wrote in message
om...
"Matt Nemmers" wrote in message
news:MBord.427677$wV.214563@attbi_s54...
Does anyone else find it truly amazing that somebody like Sam Sloan --
somebody who can't even manage his own life, care for his own children
(legitimate or otherwise), or hold down a steady (and legal) job, and
somebody who has been soundly thrashed for every single office for which
he's ever run, including the USCF Executive Board (numerous times) --
thinks
that HE knows how to run the United States Chess Federation better than
it's
duly elected officials? He's not on the inside, nobody worth their salt
trusts him, nobody who supplies him with information has access to any
more
accurate sources than any other member who does their homework, and the
guy
STILL continues his exercises in futility.

What a ****ing imbecile.


Ever hear the expression "Speak for yourself"?


Yeah. Who'd you THINK I was speaking for?

Sam Sloan evidently knows New York law better than the entire
Executive Board, better than the lawyer and the real estate broker
USCF used to "sell" their building. And for this you call him an
imbecile?


Perhaps, but then you can cloud *any* issue and file a lawsuit for just
about *any* reason these days. Just ask Ray Gordon. Doesn't mean Sloan's
exceptional. Anybody with a serious problem with the Crossville move
could've caused all this legal ruckus. Sloan just happens to be unemployed
and has nothing better to do with his life. You think he's doing this for
the good of the membership or the Federation?? Get a grip, man! Sloan's an
attention whore who just can't deal if he's not the center of attention.
You must be new 'round here not to have figured THAT out by now.

Clearly you've got some kind of problem, and you're trying
to make your problem his.


Yeah. *I'm* the one with the problem. I'm sure you're right. My websites
are MUCH more disturbing than Sloan's.

Toodles,

Matt


David Ames



  #10  
Old December 2nd 04, 05:15 AM
Matt Nemmers
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"ASCACHESS" wrote in message
...

This is unintentionally funny.


As funny as your defense of the theft of $25,000 from CalChess?

Let's see. Sam Sloan or USCF's duly elected officials.

Considering the history of the later, it is just about a pickem.


If you seriously don't think there's a difference, then it's a good thing
you're out of chess on your can.

Matt continues to prove that he is new.


I've been posting here since 1999 -- long enough to tell the difference
between the good guys, the bad guys, and fruitcakes like Sloan -- so spare
me your patronizing, "old timer."

MN


Richard Peterson



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sam Sloan or Tim Hanke break up USCF "Open Meeting" Sam Sloan rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 13 December 19th 04 05:20 PM
Sloan vs. USCF: Amazing Matt Nemmers rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 10 December 4th 04 08:26 PM
THE U.S.CHESS TRUST WPraeder rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 22 December 23rd 03 07:30 AM
Sam Sloan "judgment". Bruce Draney rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 24 October 14th 03 06:24 AM
Eade's Libel Charge vs. Sloan Parrthenon rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 0 October 13th 03 04:55 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 ChessBanter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Loans - Cheap Loan - Final Fantasy OST - Mobile Phone - Property for sale in Spain