"Spam Scone" wrote in message
oups.com...

Randy Bauer wrote:
(Snipped)

Randy, why are you bothering to respond to all this garbage?

Because it's kind of like negative campaigning in politics. Even though
it's ugly and distorted, people respond to it. I'm not going to let Sam
Sloan spew lies and Larry Parr make him into the chess version of Mother
Theresa without pointing out the lies and evident contradictions.

Randy Bauer

Randy Bauer wrote:
"Spam Scone" wrote in message
oups.com...

Randy Bauer wrote:
(Snipped)

Randy, why are you bothering to respond to all this garbage?

Because it's kind of like negative campaigning in politics. Even
though
it's ugly and distorted, people respond to it. I'm not going to let
Sam
Sloan spew lies and Larry Parr make him into the chess version of
Mother
Theresa without pointing out the lies and evident contradictions.

Randy Bauer

But there are others who ENJOY doing this sort of thing. Why put Matt
Nemmers and Louis Blair out of work?

On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 23:21:44 GMT, "Randy Bauer"
wrote:


"Spam Scone" wrote in message
roups.com...

Randy Bauer wrote:
(Snipped)

Randy, why are you bothering to respond to all this garbage?

Because it's kind of like negative campaigning in politics. Even though
it's ugly and distorted, people respond to it. I'm not going to let Sam
Sloan spew lies and Larry Parr make him into the chess version of Mother
Theresa without pointing out the lies and evident contradictions.

Randy Bauer

So far, you have not pointed out any specific lies, not one.

I imagine that your lawyer, if he is your lawyer (I am not sure) will
want to put in a reply to my two affidavits, and then you will have to
come up with something concrete.

For example, if you want to dispute that Beatriz has no verifiable job
you will have to say where she works. If you want to dispute the other
thing about Beatriz you will have to say that you know that is not
true because you did her last week

I have just posted my two reply affidavits on my website at
http://www.samsloan.com/dubeckop.pdf
http://www.samsloan.com/goichop.pdf

You are the first to know. So get to work and come up with something.

Sam Sloan

"Spam Scone" wrote in message
oups.com...

Randy Bauer wrote:
"Spam Scone" wrote in message
oups.com...

Randy Bauer wrote:
(Snipped)

Randy, why are you bothering to respond to all this garbage?

Because it's kind of like negative campaigning in politics. Even
though
it's ugly and distorted, people respond to it. I'm not going to let
Sam
Sloan spew lies and Larry Parr make him into the chess version of
Mother
Theresa without pointing out the lies and evident contradictions.

Randy Bauer

But there are others who ENJOY doing this sort of thing. Why put Matt
Nemmers and Louis Blair out of work?


Matt's busy getting ready to move south; Louis stepped up and pointed out
some Parr-for-the-course shortcomings in a current thread, for which I am,
of course, grateful. Unfortunately, most times Parr and Sloan just post too
damn often to expect others to respond. Parr also has this annoying
tendancy to post responses to one thread in another, which makes it hard to
keep on point ... gee, I'm sure that's benign and unintentional, right?

Randy Bauer

In article , StanB says...


"Kevin L. Bachler" wrote in message
...

In article .com, Spam
Scone
says...

But what an awful settlement! What would she do with Sloan's used
condom collection?

Neil. I'm ashamed of you. How could you write something like this?? We
all
know Sam wouldn't be caught dead using a condom.

Who said they were his condoms?

When I lobbed it up there like that, I was certain that either you or Neil would
slam it home.

**High five***


--
Kevin L. Bachler

Kevin L. Bachler wrote:
In article , StanB says...


"Kevin L. Bachler" wrote in
message
...

In article
.com, Spam
Scone
says...

But what an awful settlement! What would she do with Sloan's used
condom collection?

Neil. I'm ashamed of you. How could you write something like
this?? We
all
know Sam wouldn't be caught dead using a condom.

Who said they were his condoms?

When I lobbed it up there like that, I was certain that either you or
Neil would
slam it home.

**High five***


--
Kevin L. Bachler
Kevin, I think both Stan and I scored on that one. Thanks for the pass.

Randy Bauer wrote:
"Spam Scone" wrote in message
oups.com...

Randy Bauer wrote:
"Spam Scone" wrote in message
oups.com...

Randy Bauer wrote:
(Snipped)

Randy, why are you bothering to respond to all this garbage?

Because it's kind of like negative campaigning in politics. Even
though
it's ugly and distorted, people respond to it. I'm not going to
let
Sam
Sloan spew lies and Larry Parr make him into the chess version of
Mother
Theresa without pointing out the lies and evident contradictions.

Randy Bauer

But there are others who ENJOY doing this sort of thing. Why put
Matt
Nemmers and Louis Blair out of work?


Matt's busy getting ready to move south; Louis stepped up and pointed
out
some Parr-for-the-course shortcomings in a current thread, for which
I am,
of course, grateful. Unfortunately, most times Parr and Sloan just
post too
damn often to expect others to respond. Parr also has this annoying
tendancy to post responses to one thread in another, which makes it
hard to
keep on point ... gee, I'm sure that's benign and unintentional,
right?

I put it down to Larry not being computer-savvy.

Randy Bauer wrote:
"Spam Scone" wrote in message
oups.com...

Randy Bauer wrote:
"Spam Scone" wrote in message
oups.com...

Randy Bauer wrote:
(Snipped)

Randy, why are you bothering to respond to all this garbage?

Because it's kind of like negative campaigning in politics. Even
though
it's ugly and distorted, people respond to it. I'm not going to
let
Sam
Sloan spew lies and Larry Parr make him into the chess version of
Mother
Theresa without pointing out the lies and evident contradictions.

Randy Bauer

But there are others who ENJOY doing this sort of thing. Why put
Matt
Nemmers and Louis Blair out of work?


Matt's busy getting ready to move south; Louis stepped up and pointed
out
some Parr-for-the-course shortcomings in a current thread, for which
I am,
of course, grateful. Unfortunately, most times Parr and Sloan just
post too
damn often to expect others to respond. Parr also has this annoying
tendancy to post responses to one thread in another, which makes it
hard to
keep on point ... gee, I'm sure that's benign and unintentional,
right?

I put it down to Larry not being computer-savvy.

Matt,
Are you moving to my neck of the woods?
If so, I would love to help if you need anything.
Rob

"Parrthenon" wrote in message
...
Randy Bauer now charges, very falsely indeed, that I am turning Sam Sloan
into
a chess version of Mother Teresa.

Amazing junk. I have said repeatedly that Sam is badly flawed, but I
have also said that based on the exchanges on this forum, he is a
gentleman in
comparison with Randy Bauer or Stan Booz.

Larry Parr's "gentleman" in one post:

Refers to respected former USCF President Dr. Leroy Dubeck as a "whacko"
bent on revenge who "wants [the USCF] to get into the building construction
business".

Refers to former Board member Harry Sabine as one who "cooked up this scheme
to move the USCF to Crossville." Alleges it is "widely known" that Sabine,
an attorney and county commissioner, "wants to become Executive Director of
the USCF."

Current President Beatriz Marinello is a "notorious lesbian" and she and
Vice President of Finance Tim Hanke are "unemployed with probably little
money." They have "questionable backgrounds" and we are "not sure" whether
they are "going to run off with the money." Tim and Beatriz running off
with the USCF money "could possibly happen."

Larry Parr's defense of Sloan -- and belief in him -- is bizarre. In an
earlier post, Parr took to attacking me with claims of ties to chess
political allies that he has not been able to back up with facts.

It's time for Parr to put up or shut up here as well. Parr, you've got a
whole Google archive to use as research, please find posts where I attacked
a similar number of respected chess figures to the despicable extent
exhibited here by Sam Sloan. If you cannot, I'll be waiting for a
correction. Of course, I won't hold my breath.

I realize it's too much to ask for an apology -- you've picked your bed, I
expect you to continue to lie in it.

Randy Bauer








..