"Randy Bauer" wrote in message
news:nJRud.557050$D%.167537@attbi_s51...

I realize it's too much to ask for an apology -- you've picked your bed, I
expect you to continue to lie in it.

Larry is sleeping with Sam Sloan?

StanB wrote:
"Frank Dreck" wrote in message
t...

[snip]

Well Charlie, it's like this. Sam Sloan has no regular or known
source of
income and [snip]

Your use of "Charlie" here reminded me of something that I would have
forgotten, which is that "Frank Dreck" seems a lot like a pseudonym.
"Frank Dreck" came into existence since the lawsuit, and "Frank Dreck"
posts messages only about the lawsuit, and only to take Sam's side, but
usually saying things that Sam would rather not have over his own
signature. So perhaps "Frank Dreck" is Sam.

What is the purpose of "Frank Dreck"? Purely provocation. (You can
verify that by reading the message to which Stan was replying; I
snipped it because it's too provocative even for me.) What would be
Sam's interest in such provocation? I suppose he wants to get the
parties he is suing to say things that make life more difficult for
their lawyers.

"Frank Dreck" is not the only new name to post messages on the topic of
the lawsuit. I guess pseudonyms are cheap and there's no limit one per
customer.

Bruce

Bruce,


Frank defined - [Clearly manifest; clinically evident]
Dreckdefined --[From German, dirt, trash, and Yiddish drek, excrement
]
It's all in the name!


;-)
Rob

In article , Altes Wiesel says...


"Sam Sloan" wrote in message
...
Usually I ignore the slings and arrows being thrown at me, but this
one I think I will keep.

From hinceforth I shall be known as "A chess version of Mother
Teresa."

Sam Sloan

Sam, I've always thought of you as a mother. It's just that Teresa was not
the next word I had in mind.

-Der Wiesel

Gotta love it!


--
Kevin L. Bachler

"Rob Mitchell" It's all in the name!

ROB: To steal, as in Ass-Bandit.

"Bruce Leverett" wrote in message
ups.com...

Your use of "Charlie" here reminded me of something that I would have
forgotten, which is that "Frank Dreck" seems a lot like a pseudonym.
"Frank Dreck" came into existence since the lawsuit, and "Frank Dreck"
posts messages only about the lawsuit, and only to take Sam's side, but
usually saying things that Sam would rather not have over his own
signature. So perhaps "Frank Dreck" is Sam.

It has occurred to me lately that Sam may very well be behind so many of the
anonymous posters that come and go here. Sam, when he puts his mind to it,
can be an excellent writer. He could easily mask his usual style. Sam also
likes to crosspost mucho rubbish just to whip up activity here. But he's not
the only one doing it.

On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 19:10:09 -0500, "StanB"
wrote:


"Bruce Leverett" wrote in message
oups.com...

Your use of "Charlie" here reminded me of something that I would have
forgotten, which is that "Frank Dreck" seems a lot like a pseudonym.
"Frank Dreck" came into existence since the lawsuit, and "Frank Dreck"
posts messages only about the lawsuit, and only to take Sam's side, but
usually saying things that Sam would rather not have over his own
signature. So perhaps "Frank Dreck" is Sam.

It has occurred to me lately that Sam may very well be behind so many of the
anonymous posters that come and go here. Sam, when he puts his mind to it,
can be an excellent writer. He could easily mask his usual style. Sam also
likes to crosspost mucho rubbish just to whip up activity here. But he's not
the only one doing it.

However, it is not my style. My preference is to be the only one right
when everyone else is wrong.

Therefore, I would never create an anonymous poster who agrees with
me. In contrast, Kevin Bachler and Bruce Draney feel a need to have
someone in the group agree with them, so when they feel outnumbered
they go out and create a fake personality. I never do that.

I was just researching the Bible to find out an example of this.
Repent sinners and read your Bible. There is a story in the Old
Testament that goes something like this:

They brought 30 great and wise men and they all said that A was true,
but this prophet said, no A is false and B is true.

Then they brought 60 great and wise men and they all said that A was
true, but this prophet said, no A is false and B is true.

Then they brought 100 great and wise men and they all said that A was
true, but this prophet said, no A is false and B is true.

In the end it comes out that the prophet was right and all those other
190 were wrong.

Can anybody find the name of this prophet because I am just looking
and I cannot remember it? It might have been the same one who was told
by God to lie.

Sam Sloan

On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 00:33:01 GMT, (Sam Sloan)
wrote:

On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 19:10:09 -0500, "StanB"
wrote:


"Bruce Leverett" wrote in message
roups.com...

Your use of "Charlie" here reminded me of something that I would have
forgotten, which is that "Frank Dreck" seems a lot like a pseudonym.
"Frank Dreck" came into existence since the lawsuit, and "Frank Dreck"
posts messages only about the lawsuit, and only to take Sam's side, but
usually saying things that Sam would rather not have over his own
signature. So perhaps "Frank Dreck" is Sam.

It has occurred to me lately that Sam may very well be behind so many of the
anonymous posters that come and go here. Sam, when he puts his mind to it,
can be an excellent writer. He could easily mask his usual style. Sam also
likes to crosspost mucho rubbish just to whip up activity here. But he's not
the only one doing it.

However, it is not my style. My preference is to be the only one right
when everyone else is wrong.

Therefore, I would never create an anonymous poster who agrees with
me. In contrast, Kevin Bachler and Bruce Draney feel a need to have
someone in the group agree with them, so when they feel outnumbered
they go out and create a fake personality. I never do that.

I was just researching the Bible to find out an example of this.
Repent sinners and read your Bible. There is a story in the Old
Testament that goes something like this:

They brought 30 great and wise men and they all said that A was true,
but this prophet said, no A is false and B is true.

Then they brought 60 great and wise men and they all said that A was
true, but this prophet said, no A is false and B is true.

Then they brought 100 great and wise men and they all said that A was
true, but this prophet said, no A is false and B is true.

In the end it comes out that the prophet was right and all those other
190 were wrong.

Can anybody find the name of this prophet because I am just looking
and I cannot remember it? It might have been the same one who was told
by God to lie.

Sam Sloan

I need to add that while I would never create an anonymous poster who
agrees with me, I might consider creating an anonymous poster who
disagrees with me. When I receive a letter from someone who strongly
disagrees with me, I often post it here.

Fortunately, there is no shortage of people who disagree with me, so I
do not need to create fake personalities who do so.

Sam Sloan

"Sam Sloan" wrote in message
...

I need to add that while I would never create an anonymous poster who
agrees with me, I might consider creating an anonymous poster who
disagrees with me. When I receive a letter from someone who strongly
disagrees with me, I often post it here.

Hmmmnnnn.

ok,?