![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: adult, commitment, grow, numbers |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Each candidate has his/her campaign statement. One guy says job one
is the website, another is freaked out by COI issues, and there is the usual crew of kiddie herders. I didn't see anything from any candidate (or current Board) that could be taken as a commitment to grow adult membership by even a modest 3-5%. What would it take to grow the adult numbers by just 3-5%? Ideas please. Old Haasie |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Chess Life should be converted to an electronic magazine. There is no justification for the cost of a paper publication for an organization with less than 50K adult members. The USCF should devote money to sponsoring top american players to give lectures and demos at USCF affiliate sites throughout the nation. If the Marshall Chess Club can include such perks for all members, the USCF can certainly do the same. The USCF needs to stay out of any kind of buying or selling of merchandise. Pieces, boards, and clocks should have published standards, but the sales should be conducted ONLY by outside companies. The USCF could charge a fee for official endorsement. Makers of chess equipment, books, and software, should be encouraged to sponsor tournaments and exhibitions as part of the correct USCF purpose: to PROMOTE chess! |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Forking Knight" wrote in message ... I think membership would go up by much more than 3% if the USCF stopped trying to exert ownership over tournaments. The $49 dues should allow the member to play in ANY USCF sanctioned tournament FREE OF CHARGE. The focus should be on PROMOTING chess, not trying to control the venues, sponsors, and players. These aren't defending anything, FK, just helping you out with some facts. Unless you are playing in a very small set of tournaments, you do not pay the USCF anything for your tournament participation. A portion of your tournament fee is used by the organizer to pay the USCF for rating the tournament. This is pennies per game. snip magazine discussion The USCF needs to stay out of any kind of buying or selling of merchandise. Pieces, boards, and clocks should have published standards, but the sales should be conducted ONLY by outside companies. The USCF could charge a fee for official endorsement. Makers of chess equipment, books, and software, should be encouraged to sponsor tournaments and exhibitions as part of the correct USCF purpose: to PROMOTE chess! So, I take it that you are unaware that the USCF doesn't sell merchandise? David -- without the block |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
So far we've seen nothing from the Board or its candidates re a
commitment to a 3-5% growth in the adult numbers. They're all hung up with their cosmetic approaches, i.e., piddle with Chess Life, diddle with the website, and funky dance the COI matters,.. but growth is not a hot item among them, particularly in the adult arena. More lipstick for the pig, please. Old Haasie |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Unless you are playing in a very small set of tournaments, you do not pay
the USCF anything for your tournament participation. A portion of your tournament fee is used by the organizer to pay the USCF for rating the tournament. This is pennies per game. "For just 52 cents a day you can support a chess federation..." |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Whether or not the USCF is directly involved in these sales doesn't matter. They shouldn't devote any resources to it, and this online catalog clearly violates that principle IMHO. I'm posting a schedule for a USCF affiliate I am familiar with below: Sunday: closed Monday: League games Call to sign-up as teams or as individuals USCF rated. Game/90 minutes. $25 Tuesday: Closed Wednesday: Bughouse fun tournament, 6:30pm to 8:30pm. For adults and kids Partner assigned. $3 Rated games with the Community Chess Club. Rated USCF Games, 7:30pm to 10pm. Opponent assigned. $3 Thursday: Closed Friday: Closed Saturday: Youth Rated USCF Tournament 10am to 1pm. Players can learn how to use clocks and record moves Prizes for each player and each player earns national ratings 30 minute games, usually 3 to 5 games. $5 Adult Rated USCF Tournament 2pm to 8pm. 60 minute games, 3 rounds. $12 adult, $10 in high school, $8 pre HS /end of schedule The fees you see there are in addition to the club membership fees, and on top of USCF membership fees as well. So, if I wanted to participate in the Monday night leagues, I'd be paying about $100 a month just for some USCF rated games (perhaps as few as 4) a month. I can't imagine many people would pay this kind of money, and this is the only club for a large area. I think the USCF should insist that fees for USCF rated games be as nominal as possible, up to and including no charge, if practical. It just seems to me that these affiliates feel they should make several dollars for EVERY game played on their premises. Am I wrong? |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
For those who can take advantage of the promotional membership it can
work to be less than 9 cents each day. For an annual Regular Membership, it's less than 14 cents each day. Best regards, George John |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
When I first joined the USCF I did so to play in tournaments. I didn't
know they had a magazine and really didn't care. I care even less about the magazine now because the flatulent bloviation of people like fat-ass Jerry Hanken make me ill. In the first year (1973) I played in USCF events, the little town I lived in (population 8,000) had a twenty-year-old USCF affiliated club with 20 USCF members and about 30 non-USCF members. That year I played in about 50 rated games and played in over 60 rated games the next year. Fast forward 30+ years. The little town I grew up in has long lost its chess club and the last time I asked for mailing lables, it didn't even have a single USCF member (even widdle kiddies!) even though its population is now 12,000. I now live in a small city of 250,000 and it also long ago lost its chess club. If I am lucky, I might find some skittles games with a few players in one of the bookstores, but that is not guaranteed. At most there are two weekend tournaments a year here and they both lose money and are financially supported by the tournament directors in order for them to have tournaments to play in. I used to run USCF tournaments here too, but I finally stopped when it became too difficult and expensive to recruit new players to replace the inevitable deaths, moves, and loss of interest among current players. Since I hate the magazine, joined the USCF only to play in tournaments, have to travel to play in a weekend tournament, even 14 cents each day for the membership is no longer worth it. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
An idea to facilitate the growth of adult USCF members:
Put all of the current crop of national chess polititions in a rickety school bus with no brakes and bald tires. Then let Ted Kennedy drive them around all the bridges in the Florida Keys during a major hurricane after he has had two fifths of vodka to keep out the chill. Either that let the next Policy Board meeting take place in downtown Faluja, Iraq and plaster the building with lots of United States flags and ask the locals to provide ham sandwiches for lunch. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Forking Knight" wrote in message ...[color=blue][i] David Wrote: "Forking Knight" wrote in message ... - These aren't defending anything, FK, just helping you out with some facts. Unless you are playing in a very small set of tournaments, you do not pay the USCF anything for your tournament participation. A portion of your tournament fee is used by the organizer to pay the USCF for rating the tournament. This is pennies per game. snip magazine discussion The USCF needs to stay out of any kind of buying or selling of merchandise. Pieces, boards, and clocks should have published standards, but the sales should be conducted ONLY by outside companies. The USCF could charge a fee for official endorsement. Makers of chess equipment, books, and software, should be encouraged to sponsor tournaments and exhibitions as part of the correct USCF purpose: to PROMOTE chess!- So, I take it that you are unaware that the USCF doesn't sell merchandise? David -- without the block With regard to selling merchandise: What is this then? http://www.uscfsales.com/ Whether or not the USCF is directly involved in these sales doesn't matter. They shouldn't devote any resources to it, and this online catalog clearly violates that principle IMHO. I'm posting a schedule for a USCF affiliate I am familiar with below: Sunday: closed Monday: League games Call to sign-up as teams or as individuals USCF rated. Game/90 minutes. $25 stuff deleted /end of schedule The fees you see there are in addition to the club membership fees, and on top of USCF membership fees as well. So, if I wanted to participate in the Monday night leagues, I'd be paying about $100 a month just for some USCF rated games (perhaps as few as 4) a month. I can't imagine many people would pay this kind of money, and this is the only club for a large area. I think the USCF should insist that fees for USCF rated games be as nominal as possible, up to and including no charge, if practical. It just seems to me that these affiliates feel they should make several dollars for EVERY game played on their premises. Am I wrong? -- Forking Knight The $25 you quoted is for an entire league session, typically 10 weeks. At four games a month your cost would be $10 not including USCF membership, club membership, coffee, ... The $25 includes expenses for team and individual trophies. Club membership reduces the $25 to something less but I don't recall to what. |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| USCF Numbers: adult, under-18, under-14? | richardfkennedy@hotmail.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | March 31st 05 05:12 PM |
| More tournament data | Mike Nolan | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 3 | February 27th 04 04:14 AM |
| Waiting for the latest adult membership numbers. | Bruce Draney | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 48 | November 14th 03 06:48 PM |
| Comparative Adult Membership Numbers for August/September | Mike Nolan | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 0 | October 4th 03 08:42 AM |
| Further Refining of Adult Membership Decline Numbers. | Bruce Draney | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 10 | September 20th 03 06:42 PM |