Sam Sloan wrote:
I am disputing that you, Randy, who has never played a rated game in
eight years, are a real chess player.

Sam Sloan

Prove it, Sloan, by playing him. He's provided the purse, all you have
to do is show up. Is this concept that hard for you to understand? Or
are you just a big ****in' CHICKEN, unwilling to put your skill where
your mouth is (since the money's already been provided for your broke
ass)?

(Though this isn't a rhetorical question, I don't expect an answer.
Sloan will puss-out as predicted.)

MN

"Sam Sloan" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 18:50:03 GMT, "Randy Bauer"
wrote:

Bill has beaten some excellent players.

I am not disputing that Bill is a real chess player. I have seen his
results.

I am disputing that you, Randy, who has never played a rated game in
eight years, are a real chess player.

Sam Sloan

This sort of illogic would suggest that GM Larry Evans is not a real chess
player. It would also suggest that GM Bobby Fischer is not a real chess
player.

I've put up numerous games where I beat masters, senior masters, won Grand
Prix tournaments, state championships. Sam Sloan, now an A player,
considers himself a real player but not me.

Get real.

Randy Bauer

"Randy Bauer" wrote in message
news:_3pte.86665$xm3.84244@attbi_s21...

I've put up numerous games where I beat masters, senior masters, won Grand
Prix tournaments, state championships. Sam Sloan, now an A player,
considers himself a real player but not me.

Sam can't be a real player. He is only 200 points higher than me and he's
been playing for fifty years or more. I've only been playing for 12. Sam
must be a fish.

StanB wrote:
"Randy Bauer" wrote in message
news:_3pte.86665$xm3.84244@attbi_s21...

I've put up numerous games where I beat masters, senior masters, won Grand
Prix tournaments, state championships. Sam Sloan, now an A player,
considers himself a real player but not me.

Sam can't be a real player. He is only 200 points higher than me and he's
been playing for fifty years or more. I've only been playing for 12. Sam
must be a fish.

Let's give credit where credit is due.

It takes more studying to become a 1500 player than to get a PhD in
mathematics according to Sloan, and he's 1900-something.

My what 50+ years of chessplaying will do for a motivated player.

Regards,

Matt

Sam Sloan dared come forth and utter:

Yes, I could easily play Bill Brock,Taylor Kingston, Randy Bauer, and
the top 5 players in the USCF in a simultaneous exhibition in both
Chinese Chess and shogi at the same time and win all of my games
without difficulty.

There is however one opponent would be dangerous. International Master
Larry Kaufman is much stronger than I in both chess and shogi. He once
beat me in Chinese chess too, but that was 20 years ago when I was not
very good.

However, as long as you keep Larry Kaufman out of the game, I can
easily beat all of the rest of them simultaneously and possibly
blindfolded as well.

Yeah, I'm sure you could easily play those guys and kick their asses,
and that's because Chinese Chess and shogi SUCK! Chinese Chess is for
little kids.

I could beat you, Sloan, at the REAL game, blindfolded and with my
hands tied behind my back. I'd just have to move the pieces with my
teeth. Or gums, rather. I had my front teeth kicked out a few years
back when I got into a fight with one of my grandfather's drinking
buddies down at the Legion Hall when he said Fischer should have lost
that game against Botvinnik.

So don't come selling that swagger around here, Sloan! I'll show you
how a real man plays!

On 21 Jun 2005 07:17:51 -0700, wrote:

Sam Sloan dared come forth and utter:

Yes, I could easily play Bill Brock,Taylor Kingston, Randy Bauer, and
the top 5 players in the USCF in a simultaneous exhibition in both
Chinese Chess and shogi at the same time and win all of my games
without difficulty.

There is however one opponent would be dangerous. International Master
Larry Kaufman is much stronger than I in both chess and shogi. He once
beat me in Chinese chess too, but that was 20 years ago when I was not
very good.

However, as long as you keep Larry Kaufman out of the game, I can
easily beat all of the rest of them simultaneously and possibly
blindfolded as well.

Yeah, I'm sure you could easily play those guys and kick their asses,
and that's because Chinese Chess and shogi SUCK! Chinese Chess is for
little kids.

Chinese Chess is not a game for kids. You are thinking about Chinese
Checkers.

Chinese Chess and Shogi are both much more complicated and difficult
than chess, especially shogi.

I will be demonstrating both games on future episodes of my "Sam Sloan
TV Show" which starts as a regularly scheduled weekly TV Show on
Monday, June 27, 2005 at 3:30 PM on Channel 34 and 67 in Brooklyn and
on http://www.bcat.tv/bcat Channel 1 on the Internet.

Sam Sloan

Lookee here, pal. When you're the Grim Repa, they're all kids' stuff.

Sam Sloan wrote:
I will be demonstrating both games on future episodes of my "Sam Sloan
TV Show" which starts as a regularly scheduled weekly TV Show on
Monday, June 27, 2005 at 3:30 PM on Channel 34 and 67 in Brooklyn and
on http://www.bcat.tv/bcat Channel 1 on the Internet.

Sam Sloan

I'm really interested in watching this. What time will it be on the
Internet station? 3:30 PM of what time zone, GMT? And, will it be
recorded and made available online like your previous chess episode was?
It was very interesting, and I'm hoping more will be available

Please let me know! ^^