I call upon the Executive Board to expel and ban Beatriz Marinello from the United States Chess Federation TODAY!

I strongly endorse Shahade. I conditionally endorse Goichberg. I
think Joel Channing would be a wonderful addition to the Board.

Character matters.

USCF has suffered enough from the lies sown by Parr and Sloan.

Time for a board that will work together.

On 8 Jul 2005 11:54:03 -0700, "Taylor Kingston"
wrote:



Sam Sloan wrote:
Since you keep changing the subject by asking over and over again
about this girl, I will tell you the answer ... When I came to see her, she told me that she had no idea who I was,
did not recognize my name, could not recall ever having seen or met me

Perhaps by then she had learned about the disgusting way in which Sam
writes about his past affairs and Japanese women in general. If so, it
is not surprising that she would claim not to know him.

I have told this story to many people, about how I met this girl again
20 years later and she said that she could not remember me and had no
idea who I am. Almost everybody has concluded, as you do, that she
knew perfectly well who I was and did not want to admit it. In fact, I
told her that I thought this myself, but she kept insisting that she
really did not know who I was.

I reject your theory because she was very polite to me and did not
throw me out. She even allowed me to take three pictures of herself,
one of which I have posted on my website.

And you are wrong. I have never written anything about my affair with
her. I have not told you her name and will not do so either.

I stiull basically love this girl and hope to become friends with her
someday again.

As to how it is possible that she really does not remember me. back in
1984 she had a big fight or argument with her mother about me. She
told her mother about me but I believe that she did not tell her
father. It is possible that this traumatic experience caused a
complete block-out in her memory about me. I do not know the answer
but I hope to find out some day.

Sam Sloan

A requirement to disclose felony convictions may be a good one.

I would support that requirement.


While I am less comfortable with preventing those with such
convinctions from running, this is probably worth looking at, too.

I would oppose that requirement. Generally, people who have paid their
debt to society should not be barred from serving USCF (think of George
Steinbrenner).

However, it might be wise to treat certain classes of felonies as
disqualifying.

On 8 Jul 2005 14:32:49 -0700, "George John"
wrote:

This life member's reaction is the USCF needs to amend its Bylaws to
better screen its candidates.

Yes. One thing we ned to do is require candidates to identify
themselves.

We still do not know what George John's real name is.

We still do not know what jobs you have ever held, with what
companies.

We still do not know where you went to high school.

We still do not know where you went to elementary school.

George John still has refused to provide any verifiable information
that he even exists.

Nobody should be allowed to run for USCF election without providing
answers to at least one of these questions.

Sam Sloan

Nobody should be allowed to run for USCF election without providing
answers to at least one of these questions.


Questions posed by a racist child-molesting porn-peddling felon no
longer matter.

If Sloan's outrage over Natrol comes across as hypocritical, so does
your lack of outrage.


Sloan and Parr created the polarization that isolated Beatriz.

Because she was afraid to seek advice and get stabbed in the back *yet
again*, she freelanced and fell on her face, big time.

Ultimately, who's to blame?

On 8 Jul 2005 15:06:17 -0700, "
wrote:

If Sloan's outrage over Natrol comes across as hypocritical, so does
your lack of outrage.


Sloan and Parr created the polarization that isolated Beatriz.

Because she was afraid to seek advice and get stabbed in the back *yet
again*, she freelanced and fell on her face, big time.

Ultimately, who's to blame?

Goodness, what a lie.

I was her supporter. I signed her petitiion to run for election and
actively campaigned for her.

Take a look at my postings about her back in mid-2003 when she was
campaigning.

Frank Brady and Don Schultz actively supported her and it was they who
made her president.

Beatriz has turned against her active supporters. Now, she has new
supporters, Shaughnessy, Shutt, Bauer, Hanke and George John. Do they
still support her now that she has taken money for endorsing a
brainspeed drug?

Sam Sloan

Goodness, what a lie.

Goodness, what a liar.

wrote:
A requirement to disclose felony convictions may be a good one.

I would support that requirement.


While I am less comfortable with preventing those with such
convinctions from running, this is probably worth looking at, too.

I would oppose that requirement. Generally, people who have paid their
debt to society should not be barred from serving USCF (think of George
Steinbrenner).

Isn't there some law or rule that prohibits a felon from serving on the
board of a non- or not-for-profit? I know such things exist for
publicly traded companies, as Martha Stewart can attest to.

wrote in message
oups.com...
If Sloan's outrage over Natrol comes across as hypocritical, so
does
your lack of outrage.


Sloan and Parr created the polarization that isolated Beatriz.

Because she was afraid to seek advice and get stabbed in the back
*yet
again*, she freelanced and fell on her face, big time.

Ultimately, who's to blame?


No doubt they deserve blame for many things, but not the
lack of competence and character that caused this incident.