![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: beatriz, letter, open |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
AN OPEN LETTER TO BEATRIZ MARINELLO
July 26, 2005 Dear Beatriz: With slightly over two weeks remaining before the Delegates meet in Phoenix and the new Executive Board takes office, you have declared your intention to sign a contract with a builder to construct USCF's new headquarters in Crossville, and to arrange a mortgage to fund this construction cost. The estimated cost of this construction is about $550,000. The real cost is likely to be more, as such projects frequently run over budget. There will also be interest charges. The five signers of this letter will be on the new Executive Board that takes office August 14, a majority of that seven person Board. None of us supports moving USCF out of Crossville, but all are concerned that the Federation is about to commit to spending a great deal of money without having carefully considered alternatives. Randy Bauer, a current Board member who you supported for re-election, has expressed the same concern and suggested that you not sign the construction contract. There appear to be appropriately sized office buildings in Crossville advertised for sale at prices well below what it will cost to construct this building. Especially if we are able to obtain compensation for returning or selling the land we currently own, it is possible that USCF might save a great deal of money by purchasing in Crossville rather than building. While this is not certain, we do not feel it is prudent to eliminate this possibility by the immediate signing of a contract, nor do we understand why such signing is so urgent that it justifies shutting the Delegates and the new Board out of the process only about two weeks before the meetings. Too often in the past, USCF has signed contracts without adequate consideration and it has cost us money. Maybe the arrangements currently negotiated are desirable for USCF and maybe not, but analysis of our options before taking a fateful step is surely appropriate at this time. Joel Channing Bill Goichberg Don Schultz Greg Shahade Robert Tanner |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
This letter represents a complete and total repudiation of Beatriz's
inept leadership ever since the bids from Lindsborg and Liberty were rejected out of hand. Her tenure as COO was a costly disaster. Even Randy Bauer finally sees the error of his ways. Surprise. Surpise. Larry Parr was right all along. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
This letter has me wondering again...why did we move down there in the first
place? wrote None of us supports moving USCF out of Crossville, but all are concerned that the Federation is about to commit to spending a great deal of money without having carefully considered alternatives. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
OUR CROSS-TO-BEAR
This letter has me wondering again...why did we move down there in the first place? -- Angelo Selling the building in New Windsor was the first blunder. One must also wonder how many pockets were lined when the move to Tennessee was approved. As I reported to you many weeks ago, there were talks going on about returning the land in Cross-to-Bear. I was called a liar amid blank denials of said talks. Randy Bauer was utterly shameless -- truly a low flying bird. It's a pity the new Board coming in does not yet support moving. If memory serves, the USCF rejected the offer of a free building in Lindsborg and would not wait two weeks while exploring a bid from a billionaire in Liberty. End result: the Federation has lost its expertise to sell products; they have no building; they are in the middle of chess nowhere rather than near the center of U.S. chess. And so it goes. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
In the internet age, it may not matter much where the organization is
located (as long as a major airport is within 90 minutes) so I never had a problem with moving to Crossville as a low cost area. I have never felt comfortable about building a new building. Cost overruns, delays and quality issues are all possibilities. I would prefer the federation to lease or buy existing commercial space in the Crossville area. I keep hearing ads about the steel buildings that are quick to erect and cost effective. Apparently the new gen of steel buildings can have the look and feel of traditional office space at a meaningful reduction in cost and long term upkeep. Is this just advertising BS? Does anyone have personal experience with this type of construction used as office space? Seems to me like we could delay the signing the building contract to give the new board time to review all the issues. The cash available is the last meaningful asset of USCF. We blow this and it's bye-bye USCF (although I see this as less and less of a tragedy despite a sentimental attachment to the Old Dame). |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article . com, cynic says...
This letter represents a complete and total repudiation of Beatriz's inept leadership ever since the bids from Lindsborg and Liberty were rejected out of hand. Her tenure as COO was a costly disaster. Even Randy Bauer finally sees the error of his ways. Shows just how little you've been paying attention. I voted for the 2 week delay in the decision to locate in Crossville and abstained on the final vote to move to Crossville. I expressed concerns in writing to the rest of the EB about the decision to prefer new construction. Randy Bauer Surprise. Surpise. Larry Parr was right all along. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Angelo DePalma says...
This letter has me wondering again...why did we move down there in the first place? There still are good arguments for the move, and the new Board members aren't talking about leaving Crossville. We have lower costs in a variety of areas, have been able to change our staff structure to reduce costs and make it more efficient, etc. I don't think the physical plant is the primary motivation pro or con for the move. Randy Bauer wrote None of us supports moving USCF out of Crossville, but all are concerned that the Federation is about to commit to spending a great deal of money without having carefully considered alternatives. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Randy Bauer was utterly shameless -- truly a low flying bird. "Randy Bauer" spewed forth: Absolute bull dung. I had NO involvement or knowledge of these presumed talks. Bauer, you're a worse liar than the Baron von Munchausen! You have been caught red-handed lying in the past, and you expect anyone to believe you now? And I'll take a polygraph on that and make the wager of your choice on the result. Your wagering hasn't gone too well these days has it Bauer. How much did you lose on the Gredge match? Also, I understand that chronic liars like you find techniques to beat a polygraph. Regards, Jason (check my headers) Repa |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Open Letter to Beatriz | parrthenon@cs.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 40 | August 1st 05 07:24 AM |
| Dubeck lashes out | StanB | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 31 | July 28th 05 11:07 PM |
| Appellate Division - Affidavit in Support of Order to Show Cause | Randy Bauer | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 8 | April 22nd 05 05:26 AM |
| Appellate Division - Affidavit in Support of Order to Show Cause | Randy Bauer | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 1 | April 20th 05 08:40 PM |
| Fischer gets more support in Japan parliament / the 'UN' point | banana | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 46 | March 24th 05 03:35 PM |