"The Histerian" Neil Brennen wrote in message
oups.com...


Yes, I wrote that.



We all could find strength and follow newsgroup rules to kick off all false
posters and cheaters from this newsgroup. This newsgroups would serve for
chess players and chess fans.
Mr. Brennen was the first who confessed himself because he was cached and
proved like cheater and false poster.
The question is: If somebody is false poster and cheater on this newsgroup,
could he be honest in ordinary life. In business contact or in personal
relation? I think that the answer is no.
I'm disgusting of such dishonest people! Their instrict dirty threatens to
spoil all this newsgroup! So, I think that we would draw conclusion that
would be correct to kick Mr. Taylor Kingston off this newsgroup. Because Mr.
Kingston support Neil Brenenn in his dirty false mails.
Thanks for Mr. Sloan who revealed these false posters and cheaters.

Sam Sloan wrote:
One of the rules is that personal attacks are not allowed. Neil
Brennen's "biography" of me was obviously a personal attack and was
immediately removed by one of the site administrators.

No, it's still there last I checked. And it appears that by using the
"compare" option, one can cross-check various entries. Thus I was wrong
to think that the latest entry completely supercedes all previous
entries.

I did not write the original encyclopedia entry about me. I happened
to discover it by accident while doing an Internet search. As you can
see, it was written by somebody named Amorrow. I do not know this
person. Never heard of him.

If this is true, then I retract my comments about Sam submitting an
entry about himself, and apologize for jumping to that conclusion.

On 5 Aug 2005 07:25:25 -0700, "Taylor Kingston"
wrote:


Mike Murray wrote:
Except that one does not consult an encyclopedia to view an argument
in progress. On controversial topics, we expect a concise summary of
the conflict by a (presumably) neutral third party.

True, which brings into question the whole Wikipedia methodology.
Unlike, say, World Book or Britannica, there seems to be no competent
editorial control nor any guarantee that the contributors are either
neutral or knowledgeable. An encyclopedia to which anyone can
contribute can't be taken seriously.

There is new news on this that just came out 54 minutes ago.

Perhaps our current discussion and debate helped trigger this.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050805/...a_wikipedia_dc

Web's Wikipedia to tighten editorial rules-founder 54 minutes ago

BERLIN (Reuters) - Wikipedia, the Web encyclopaedia written and edited
by Internet users from all over the world, plans to impose stricter
editorial rules to prevent vandalism of its content, founder Jimmy
Wales was quoted as saying Friday.

Wiki-Pedia is pure crap for imbeciles. It is an encyclopedia written by
anyone who has access to the internet. Get to any topic first (such as Sam
Sloan) and whatever garbage is written becomes the MAIN TEXT, and then
everyone else has a shot at editing the nonsense.

I would never consult Wiki-Pedia for anything. It would be more credible to
just post a question on any newsgroup and take the first answer as GOSPEL.

Johnny Wales was probably a pimp before he had the ingenious idea of
creating a bogus encyclopedia written by the most ignorant people on earth;
those that have endless hours of internet time due to unemployment or
disability.

"Jules77" wrote in message
oups.com...
This service should make it more easy to catch the fake posters.


Sam Sloan


Nope, you can't trust it...


Mr. Brennen confessed that he was that false poster.

From: "Taylor Kingston"
Newsgroups:

As for Brennen's amendments to Sloan's Wikipedia entry, I have
offered no opinion; therefore it cannot be said that I support Brennen
in this regard.



You have to say clearly do you still support Mr. Brennen in his dirty doings
(false posts, using different nicknames, posts false biography, use vulgar
worlds, shortly in his dirty doings!).
If you support him (he confessed that he is so called "dirty poster" or
"spam sender") you are the same. I wouldn't be surprised, because I have
statement that you are mentally twins and that you are the dirtiest posters
on this newsgroup. So, my advice is to kick you off (both, you and Mr.
Brennen) from this newsgroup and generally out from chess events and every
event connected in any way with chess. That's my opinion. So we have dirty
posters KICK OFF THIS NEWSGROUP. DON'T SPOIL KING'S GAME WITH YOUR PRESENCE!
YOU ARE FINALLY REVEALED!

Dear Taylor,
as you can read on:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050805/...a_wikipedia_dc
Wikipedia, the Web encyclopaedia written and edited by Internet users from
all over the world, plans to impose stricter editorial rules to prevent
vandalism of its content, founder Jimmy Wales was quoted as saying
Friday.

Your fellow and man who you support, Neil Brennen (The Histo(e)rian) is
indirectly accused for vandalism. If you are his supporter you are also
accused for vandalism, false posts, misrepresenting and other amoral and
dirty doings. If you don's distance yourself from the "dirty man" (in moral
sense) you would be also amoral and dirty poster like him. He was several
times accused because similar doings but this is first time that Mr. Neil
Brennen confessed that he was false poster. His confess has enormous
importance for all free thinkers and writers who are fighting against dirty
in chess. So, you have to distance yourself from that dirty man or you would
be regard the same (because you supported him for years).
That dirty man have to kick off all chess events an chess generally (by the
way he scarcely could move the piece).
So, are you cheater, false poster and dirty man like Mr. Neil Brennen. Five
thousand people want to hear your answer!!! We are waiting... It's your move
Mr. Kingston!!! Are you vandal like Mr. Brennen?

Cordially,
Goran Tomic

"Vandal Kingston" wrote in message
oups.com...


Shame you! Vandal! You would spread chess culture and you spread vandalism!!
You supported Mr. Brennen who confessed that he is false poster and
indirectly Wikipedia named Mr. Brennen as "vandal". Only vandal could
support vandal. Shame you! You are accused for the worst crime in
intellectual world: for false posts, cheats and misrepresenting! If you have
a bit of honest you would go away and never come back on this newsgroup.
Now, each reader knows who you are! Vandals! Go away from this newsgroup,
vandals! It's newsgroup for honest chess players and chess funs. GO AWAY
VANDALS! Go away! Vandals without culture! Shame you!

GO AWAY VANDALS! Go away! Vandals without culture! Shame you! Goran
Tomic

If Neil Brennen has admitted to posting under false names (perhaps
wmiketwo and cynic also?) then he indicts himself.

Having said that, I don't favor kicking him or ELO-super-master NM
Taylor
Kingston off the sites. Frankly, I don't care what they write short of
death threats, etc. and the inciting thereof.

Let the gents remain.

wrote:
GO AWAY VANDALS! Go away! Vandals without culture! Shame you! Goran
Tomic

If Neil Brennen has admitted to posting under false names (perhaps
wmiketwo and cynic also?) then he indicts himself.

Unfortunately for this line of argument, Neil Brennen has NOT posted
under a false name. I merely corrected a Wikipedia posting.