Generally, you are correct that amplifying the words of hate-mongers is
unwise, as it only breeds more hate. But rules have exceptions.

I want to force the USCF Board to endorse Sam Sloan's conduct or reject
it. Not necessarily formally. Why? Because I want this Board to
succeed.

I have explained my words, Phil Innes. Are you up to explaining yours?

***********
Sam Sloan wrote:
Lately, in case you have not noticed, Bill Brock has been posting
biographies of me on Wikipedia. At first, he asked that my biography
be deleted, claiming that I had written the biography myself. This was
demonstrated not to be true. My Wikipedia biography was written by two
persons who have never met me and who know of me for reasons unrelated
to chess and who do not know each other either. I feel that it is
improper for me to comment on the biography of me, but the problem is
that first Neil Brennen and more recently Bill Brock have been posting
statements about me that are untrue. Fortunately, the site
administrators have regularly deleted these untrue statements made by
Neil Brennen and Bill Brock without intervention from any of us.

Phil Innes wrote:
Laugh - One of these biographers [Brennan] is a compulsive liar and distorter in his
every public word, even though the CJA of America have sought to honour him
for his biographies of 1700-rated players, while they ignore the Silence of
the Lambs! I know not the other one [Brock].

[....]

Sam Sloan wrote:

Nevertheless, Bill Brock keeps reposting his stuff, even after it had
been deleted. Therefore, I decided to post my own biography of Bill
Brock to alert readers to what is going on.

Phil Innes wrote:

Such stuff! And how American-egalitarian it is that one can distort another
person with seeming composure in public as if this comprised anything
worthwhile.

**********

What did I distort?

I should add that if the Board endorses Sloan's conduct, then they
might wish to slate him for the next open seat.

Distortion: Brennan s/b Brennen

wrote:
Distortion: Brennan s/b Brennen

How charming that Sloan's pet fish wishes to draw me into his dispute
with Innes!

Not at all: just a correction for the record.

Bye!

Reading Sam Sloan is interesting.

Reading Bill Brock is boring. This prude should get a life!

Will do, Larry.

Eliot's working title for "The Waste Land" was "He Do the Police in
Different Voices." OTOH, some people do various anons in the same
voice. Who's more boring, jr?

Work on your personae. Suggestion: "I'm Rick James, bitch!" (...and
I'll be Charlie Murphy.)

I don't mind porn by adults for adults. I mind adults who sexually
exploit children. Have you checked out the various Pok=E9mon porn web
pages on Sloan's web site, jr? THE PROBLEM IS NOT THE PORN PER SE;
it's the mixing of porn with content intended for children. Are you a
parent, jr?

I don't like racists. Do you like racists, jr?

Cat got your tongue, jr?

Larry Parr doesn't answer inconvenient questions, either. Create
another id for self-glorification, Larry.

Of course, if jr is not Larry Parr, jr will have no problem answering
these questions....

I'm waiting for your answer, Phil Innes.

What did I distort in the Wikipedia article?

Why won't you answer the questions about Sloan's character?

If you wish to speak privately, I'll be in my office later today.
Phone # is on my website.