![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: championships, chess, lets, states, two, united |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Whoever is interested in having two U.S. chess Championships please let
me know? We could end up with an EAST and WEST national chess federation. I fear that if Sam Sloan is going to get elected to the policy board, 1/2 of the United States will form their own chess federation and be recognized by FIDE. The only way to limit's infinite number of sexual harassment lawsuits both the fake and real Sam Sloan will expose the USCF is by forming two sepreate FIDE entities. In stead of the United States complaining about power in FIDE, the US should follow the lead of the United Kindgom, and divide within FIDE for more voting power. Another advantage of two national chess organiztions is that Sloan would be banned from 1/2 of the entire United States from Chess events. While I oppose the employment of banning in FIDE, I realize that since I am banned by USCF Congressman Mike Nolan right now, there are inevitable exceptions to the general rule. Everyone complains about the U.S.C.F., why not have everyone complain about two organizations? There isn't much moeny to even divide up any more. I don't see who would really lose, except certain people, like USCF Congressman Mike Nolan, who just have a desire for power. Organizational change has been very difficult for the Americans. OMOV took yeasrs, and did nothing. The general trend is devolution in the larger western countries, except for chess governance. I doubt that the USCF executive committee has courage to debate this issue. They will run and hide from it, until one day, I'll push the button and force it to a vote in FIDE. In the end of it, if Congressman Mike Nolan is going to do ban me from the USCF web site, then we are all a little safer with TWO MIKE NOLANS INSTEAD OF ONE. Marcus Roberts Permanent Delegate of St Kitts and Nevis to FIDE |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
How about if you have 2 dicks?
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Another advantage of two national chess organiztions is that Sloan
would be banned from 1/2 of the entire United States from Chess events. While I oppose the employment of banning in FIDE, I realize that since I am banned by USCF Congressman Mike Nolan right now, there are inevitable exceptions to the general rule. OK why have you been banned by him ? |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ambassador wrote: In stead of the United States complaining about power in FIDE, the US should follow the lead of the United Kindgom, and divide within FIDE for more voting power. Marcus Roberts Permanent Delegate of St Kitts and Nevis to FIDE The United Kingdom is the union of two or three countries: England and Scotland, and possibly Wales, though I am not sure about that. What I am sure of is that the United States is ONE nation indivisible, a mattter which has been settled since 1865. There is no basis in fact, and probably no basis in law, to claim that the U.S. is more than one country. David Ames |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Now we know that Marcus Roberts is just a dick for Ilyumzhinov.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ambassador wrote: Not true in FIDE. The US can be divided in FIDE. The FIDE rules can be changed by majority vote of the FIDE Delegates. So, if a few of my colleagues decide to make an exception, it can be done. The US civil war doesn't bound FIDE. All we are bound by is the International Olympic Committee (drug tests, etc...). A doubtful point of view. By the way, the word is "bind" -- "doesn't bind FIDE." My point is that the US constantly screams sour grapes because they don't have enough power in FIDE. This is a reasonable way to get more power, more titles (IGM, IM, I think), and not upset FIDE too much. If the US fields two teams, then we are all the less likely to score medals in the Olympiad. If you believe titles are conditioned on power, rather than strength across the chess board, then you have an erroneous view of what titles represent. Of course you would not be alone in a fallacious belief. Now, can this be done against the will of the United States? YES. FIDE can do this by a membership application. The US can't block the vote, with one supporter placing this on the 2007 agenda in Turkey. And who, do you think, is going to implement the split if USCF doesn't go for it? Piffle. This has been propoed and discussed by good players in the early 1970's (Joe Bradford) and the last I heard was that FIDE wouldn't allow it. Today, the US FIDE Delegtate refuses to talk to me. All of my communications with the USCF are second hand. None of the executive committee will even send me an e-mail to discuss the idea. I am glad to hear that. Marcus Roberts David Ames |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Go suck your own pussy Marcus Roberts. You're nothing but an
Ilyumzhinov cock sucker. Ray Gordon |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
No, they accuse you of being an Ilyumzhinov cock sucker.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| rec.games.chess.misc FAQ [2/4] | pribut@yahoo.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | March 7th 06 05:30 AM |
| rec.games.chess.misc FAQ [2/4] | pribut@yahoo.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | February 19th 06 05:44 AM |
| rec.games.chess.misc FAQ [2/4] | pribut@yahoo.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | January 19th 06 06:15 AM |
| rec.games.chess.misc FAQ [2/4] | pribut@yahoo.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | December 19th 05 05:36 AM |
| rec.games.chess.misc FAQ [2/4] | pribut@yahoo.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | December 4th 05 05:29 AM |