![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: championship, chess, great, success |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
U.S. Chess Championship a Great Success
I was skeptical but I have to admit that the US Chess Championship, which concludes today in San Diego, was a great success. Throughout the tournament I checked in several times every day to keep up with the games and the results, and I rarely do that any more. Under the old system of a 16-player round robin with nearly all the players grandmasters, I rarely looked at the results and in most years I did not even know who the US Chess Champion was. However, under the new system with a dual 64-player Swiss, there is always something interesting going on. This year, the great sensation of the tournament was completely unexpected. A previously unknown 19 year old Mongolian girl with unpronounceable name and low rating ran away with the early rounds of the tournament, defeating three top grandmasters and drawing another grandmaster, so that by round five she had scored 3.5 - 1.5 against opposition averaging 2612, so she had a performance rating of 2782, or a world championship performance. Batchimeg Tuvshintugs (nice name, eh!) rated 2271 started the tournament with a bang, defeating Grandmaster Alexander Fishbein (rated 2593) who ultimately finished fourth. Batchimeg Tuvshintugs then lost to Grandmaster Yury Shulman (2623) who won the trournament, defeated Grandmaster Boris Kreiman (2535), drew Grandmaster Boris Gulko (2678) and then defeated Grandmaster Julio Becerra (2629). Sadly, she then lost all the rest of her games. However, this was nothing to be ashamed of since all of her opponents were strong players, including Kamsky, rated 2729. So, the result was that poor Batchimeg Tuvshintugs did not even win the womans prize. However, this is a well known consequents. Anytime a low rated player goes to an early lead, they get bombed out by having to face the strongest players in the tournament, whereas high rated players who start badly usually get easy opponents enabling them to catch up. In this tournament, defending champion Hikura Nakamura had a disastrous start losing his first round game and scoring only one draw in his first three games against low rated opposition. However, Nakamura them came back, winning five games in a row. Thus, in the last round, Nakamura could have tied for first by beating Grandmaster Alexander Onischuk, who had led the tournament throughout. However, Nakamura had black and Onischuk only needed a draw to clench clear first place. Namakura played a Benoni Defense and the result was a wild game. I thought that Nakamura was winning. I am not really sure what happened. Too complicated. The end result was a draw by perpetual check. Probably every observer had their own favorite player to watch. I followed the results of Boris Kreiman. The reason: There was a controversy before the tournament involving Kreiman. Kreiman got in to the tournament by defeating De Guzman in the last round of the American Open. Some said that the game had been fixed; that Kreiman (a professional poker player) had paid De Guzman to dump the game. However, I studied and analyzed the game and concluded that De Guzman had simply gotten crushed. According to my analysis, De Guzman was dead lost by move 13. His sacrifice of a pawn with 13. h3 was the only way to keep the game going. Otherwise, Kreiman was going to open his position like a can of sardines. The USCF Executive Board debated this issue and decided after a vote to let Kreiman play, so it would be interesting to see how he would do. The dress code prevented Kreiman from wearing his signature attire, which is a skimpy body-hugging shirt showing off his bulging steroid-enhanced muscles. Kreiman scored 5-4 and finished in 13th place. He finished the tournament by defeating Grandmaster Becerra and drawing grandmasters Kaidanov (2722), Shabalov (2665), Ivanov (2657) and Gulko (2678). Clearly he belonged in the tournament. There were two players who did not belong in the tournament. In an effort to make the tournament more attractive to sponsors, slots had been set aside for women. However, one woman qualified by being the ONLY WOMAN to pay the $75 qualification fee. As a result, she got in even though her rating was only 1663, which ranks her below about 100,000 male chess players. Predictably, she lost ALL nine of her games. Another low rated woman also got in, rated 1872. She lost eight games and got one draw against one of the other female players. The rules will have to be changed to prevent such weak players from getting into the US Championship. Indeed, the rules have already been changed. There were a few more flaws in this tournament. For one, the lack of publicity. At a very minimum, the photo of Batchimeg Tuvshintugs should have appeared on the cover of PEOPLE magazine. These opportunities only happen once in a lifetime. The USCF blew it. I remember a similar case. In the 1996 US Open, Jennie Frenklakh, aged 15, scored a fantastic, sensational result by leading the tournament after five rounds with 5-0, after defeating three masters. Nobody bothered to inform the newspapers of this incredible achievement. Three rounds later, somebody finally got the bright idea to call the newspapers and, as a result, the San Francisco Chronicle did publish a large photo of Jennie Frenklakh on the front page, but without mentioning her chess result, because by then Jennie had lost all the rest of her games. We had this chance with Batchimeg Tuvshintugs, but now you can forget about it. One good thing: The two most beautiful women in the tournament won first prize in their respective sections, so whomever wins the playoff today, we will have a beautiful woman as our champion. This is important, because if we want to interest girls in playing chess, we need to have a suitable role model for them to look up to. Sam Sloan |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Do you want to **** her too?
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sam Sloan wrote:
Nice post, and the ending: One good thing: The two most beautiful women in the tournament won first prize in their respective sections, so whomever wins the playoff today, we will have a beautiful woman as our champion. This is important, because if we want to interest girls in playing chess, we need to have a suitable role model for them to look up to. makes you ... :-) Nice again. ************ Wlod |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Did you are to your knowledge your double threaten to kill me on this
newsgroup? Marcus Roberts Permanent Delegate of St Kitts and Nevis to FIDE |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey Marcus,
Who taught you english? Regards, CF. p.s. Do us all a favor and drop dead. "Ambassador" wrote in message oups.com... Did you are to your knowledge your double threaten to kill me on this newsgroup? Marcus Roberts Permanent Delegate of St Kitts and Nevis to FIDE |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Chess Freak wrote:
Hey Marcus, Who taught you english? Probably Sam Sloan or Phil Innes. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
AGAIN, DID YOU THREATEN TO KILL ME.
Marcus Roberts |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey Marcus:
I don't even see St. Kitts or Nevis on the FIDE member list. "Ambassador" wrote in message oups.com... Did you are to your knowledge your double threaten to kill me on this newsgroup? Marcus Roberts Permanent Delegate of St Kitts and Nevis to FIDE |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Marcus Roberts blew Ilyumzhinov to get his position.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Historian wrote: Chess Freak wrote: Hey Marcus, Who taught you english? Probably Sam Sloan or Phil Innes. Naeh, must be Boobaki. ********** Wlod |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| rec.games.chess.misc FAQ [2/4] | pribut@yahoo.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | March 7th 06 05:30 AM |
| rec.games.chess.misc FAQ [2/4] | pribut@yahoo.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | January 19th 06 06:15 AM |
| rec.games.chess.misc FAQ [2/4] | pribut@yahoo.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | December 4th 05 05:29 AM |
| rec.games.chess.misc FAQ [2/4] | pribut@yahoo.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | November 18th 05 05:36 AM |
| rec.games.chess.misc FAQ [2/4] | pribut@yahoo.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | October 19th 05 05:37 AM |