Bill Brock, who appears to have admitted to
molesting young boys by doing something worse than
showing them porn material (though I do NOT hold him
to the letter of what he wrote), can act as Taylor
Kingston's sports psychology adviser.

Grudge Match II; steel cage.

***

I take it that Larry "Thai soldiers on leave" Parr, frequent defender
of the child molester Sam Sloan, endorses Sloan's self-contradictory
defense of the convicted child molester Jefferson Poland?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jefferson_Poland

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?...oldid=41759835

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?...did=463352 07

Parr's defense of Sloan and Sloan's defense of Poland are matters of
record. This is not ancient history: Sloan made these Wikipedia
entries in March 2006.

When the facts are against Parr, he goes ad hominem.

I don't particularly care for Innes, but haven't even seen implicit
anti-Semitism in his postings here.

IRS gives us two extra days this year. It's no treat for whiny
agnostic CPAs with religious clients, what with Passover & Easter
immediately before.

Next year in Brookhaven!

"I don't like to bore rgcm readers with my games, but since you
insist, here's one with Stephen Barbre, who, if memory serves, has won
the US Absolute Correspondence Chess Championship, definitely a postal
master-class player:"

Barbre-Kingston, 1981 Golden Knights Finals, 8/1983-3/1984: 1. d4 Nf6
2. Nc3 d5 3. Bg5 Nbd7 4. Nf3 g6 5. e3 Bg7 6. Bd3 O-O 7. O-O c5 8. Ne5
Nxe5 9. dxe5 Ng4 10. Be2 d4 11. exd4 cxd4 12.Nb5 Nxe5 13. Nxd4 Qb6 14.
Bxe7 Re8 15. Bh4 Qxb2 16. Rb1 Qxa2 17. Bb5 Bg4 18. f3 Bd7 19. Bxd7 Nxd7
20. Rxb7 Qd5 21. Nc6 Qxc6 22. Rxd7 a5 23. Re1 a4 24. Rxe8+ Rxe8 25. Rd6
Qc5+ 26. Bf2 Re1+ 27. Qxe1 Qxd6 28. g3 a3 29. Qe8+ Bf8 30. Qa4 Qb4 31.
Qa8 Qb1+ 32. Kg2 Qxc2 33. g4 Qb2 0-1



How do we know that the winner wasn't using computer help? Yes, I
think it is entirely possible that Taylor Kingston overwhelmed the
absolute champ by consulting with Atari 2600 chess program, retrofitted
to run on a Cray supercomputer. His partner in crime? Bob Hyatt, of
course. Together, they "stole" six million dollars worth of processor
time from the Cray Corporation in order to win this one game. Note the
hyperactivity of Black's Queen, snarfing pawns -- that's all the
"proof" we need.


"Never take the Queen's Knight pawn with your Queen." -- somebody
famous

wrote:
I don't particularly care for Innes, but haven't even seen implicit
anti-Semitism in his postings here.

I think Innes has dropped enough hints. Leaving aside for the moment
his constant defense of anti-Semites Bobby Fischer, Rolf Tueschen, and
Goran Tomic, you may wish to consider his statement that the "blood
libel" was mere 'fear of outsiders' and had nothing to do with Jews, or
his statement that during the Shoah - or, as Innes puts it, the Showa -
"no one was much innocent". Or search for his defense of the posting
"Being a Jew and a Liar".

IRS gives us two extra days this year. It's no treat for whiny
agnostic CPAs with religious clients, what with Passover & Easter
immediately before.

Next year in Brookhaven!

Or search for his defense of the posting "Being a Jew and a Liar".


It's in rgcm. Ewww.

Defending child molestation does not necessarily make one a child
molester, but (shorn of context) it's not a nice thing.

So too this....

wrote:
Or search for his defense of the posting "Being a Jew and a Liar".


It's in rgcm. Ewww.

Defending child molestation does not necessarily make one a child
molester, but (shorn of context) it's not a nice thing.

I'm not sure it would be considered "nice" even in context.

So too this....

Agreed.

"help bot" wrote in message
oups.com...
Near-IM Innes challenged:

"you want to play too? bring it, i'll play you both simultaneously.
or put
some money up. anything! anything but more saxon würds"

**more würds, i'll play you too! but will need to increase the time limit to
15 minutes, in case of the 'i am beat but won't resign and am here to eat
your time factor', a straegy learned in newsgroups

**as a matter of interest, does anyone here actually play chess? i have
asked people before, but they have been unresponsive. i tried to ask if
anyone had encountered a certain variation OTB and someone wrote in to say
what the book line was... ;(

**a week ago i was speaking with a local tyro, a 2350 otb player, who says
he is now 1600, and together we discussed endings - neither of us knew
anything about them, nor much more about openings either [we both lied] but
only with würds! since the sense was that the fight was everything, and
remembering positions that you couldn't work out for yourself ensures many a
patzer stays a patzer

**with a combined 80 years of chess playing, neither of us had ever
encountered a KBN v K endgame, and we had to 'figure out' which corner you
have to get the K to, rather than 'remember' which it was

**i wonder if anyone here has ever played a KBN v K endgame, from either
side?

**Phil Innes

Brave words, a near-IM challenging to simultaneously tackle two OTB
patzers, with Sloan as his second! But how brave a Celt would he be
if challenged by another chessic titan? How bold a Celt to tackle
Fritz-bot or Keene? Evans or Smirnov? Spassky or Jim Beam? True
masters of the game.

Flail away if you will at the patzers and duffers, the hapless
victims of self-mates and hanging Queens; but fool yourself not into
thinking you are very brave or a bold adventurer, climbing these tiny
molehills!


-- help bot

I'm not sure [defending child molestation] would be considered
"nice" even in context.

Attorneys defend alleged child *molesters* all the time; that's an
honorable profession.

You are correct to correct me: defending child molestation in the
abstract, as Larry "Thai soldiers on leave" Parr has done, is not nice.