![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: bother, pollling, readers |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#51
|
|||
|
|||
|
POT CALLS KETTLE BLACK
Surely you can't be suggesting that a known perjurer, such as yourself, should be taken at all seriously? -- Taylor Kingston to jr Looks like known perjurer Mr. 2300+ Elo has added another person to his enemy list -- without addressing the topic at hand. |
| Ads |
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message oups.com... My understanding is that GM Evans has several offers pending to pick up his Q&A column from prestigious European magazines. If that happens, we will have a good way to quantify the value of Evans' column. Parr can feel vindicated if Evans' new magazine gains, say, 10,000 subscribers and USCF loses 10,000 members. But whatever the effect on subscriptions, I'd expect that Evans' columns will improve in quality. This is because working for a private magazine dependent on subscribers is going to be more demanding than his semi-patronage position at the USCF. So the chess world wins in any event. |
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
|
Another way of saying it is that they're preaching to the choir.
How long before ICC starts its own OTB events? "Vince Hart" wrote in message ups.com... Polling current members is probably not worth the bother for several reasons: (1) Does not provide any help in determining what might attract new members; (2) Does not provide any help in determining what might recapture former members; (3) Provides little help in determining what new features might increase appeal of magazine to current members: (4) May be biased towards a status quo that is not presently working very well. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|