A Chess forum. ChessBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ChessBanter forum » Chess Newsgroups » rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: ,

Why I'm voting for Sam



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #151  
Old May 13th 06, 12:45 AM posted to rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why I'm voting for Sam


LiamToo wrote:
Jerzy wrote:
I will give you my conditions later. I am not interested if Tyrone or
someone else will approve them.

My conditions will be final. I mean conditions on place, date and other
technical issues of the match.

I have not decided to fly to Iowa, wherever it is or whatever it is, but
probably I will fly to some other State. So Herr Bauer will have to fly e.g.
to New York to play a match with me


You and Randy can negotiate the conditions on place, date and other
technical issues of the match.

Since Tyrone is the main sponsor, he has to approve the match between
you and Randy for him to release the prize money. Who knows, other
players maybe more deserving in his eyes.


For the purse offered, I would presumably arrange travel, but the idea
that one player's conditions will be "final" is absurd. Quite frankly,
I'd much prefer to play GM Evans, who would be a much greater
challenge. As Lance notes, the match is ultimately the decision of
Tyrone and the other sponsors.

Randy Bauer

Ads
  #152  
Old May 13th 06, 02:15 AM posted to rec.games.chess.politics
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why I'm voting for Sam (DSM 295.3)

Dear fellow ratpacker Randy,

I've got a great idea! We'll flip a coin, and the loser will find
suddenly Sam Sloan's character unproblematic.

The winner will take offense, and we'll have the perfect cover to play
Grudge Match II between ourselves.

Of course, you'd be the favorite and this brilliant idea was mine, so
we'd have to have a side deal to split the pot.

(But what if first prize is a 1955 Buick?)

Our secret!

best regards, Bill

  #153  
Old May 13th 06, 08:11 AM posted to rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why I'm voting for Sam

Uzytkownik "Randy Bauer" napisal w wiadomosci
ups.com...

I have not decided to fly to Iowa, wherever it is or whatever it is,
but
probably I will fly to some other State. So Herr Bauer will have to fly
e.g.
to New York to play a match with me


You and Randy can negotiate the conditions on place, date and other
technical issues of the match.

Since Tyrone is the main sponsor, he has to approve the match between
you and Randy for him to release the prize money. Who knows, other
players maybe more deserving in his eyes.


For the purse offered, I would presumably arrange travel, but the idea
that one player's conditions will be "final" is absurd. Quite frankly,
I'd much prefer to play GM Evans, who would be a much greater
challenge. As Lance notes, the match is ultimately the decision of
Tyrone and the other sponsors.


So I understand that you will change your conditions whenever you like ?
That`s an ABSURD, Herr Bauer.

My conditions will be final when I publish them. It means that I will not
change them. However I will publish them only when I get to th USA.

Of course in the meantime you can play with Mr.Evans. I will enjoy crushing
you by him very, very much


  #154  
Old May 13th 06, 02:21 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why I'm voting for Sam

Yeah, that makes perfect sense. I am to agree to play a match, and I'll
learn the terms when you arrive for the match. Get a grip.

Randy Bauer

"Jerzy" wrote in message
...
Uzytkownik "Randy Bauer" napisal w wiadomosci
ups.com...

I have not decided to fly to Iowa, wherever it is or whatever it is,
but
probably I will fly to some other State. So Herr Bauer will have to
fly e.g.
to New York to play a match with me

You and Randy can negotiate the conditions on place, date and other
technical issues of the match.

Since Tyrone is the main sponsor, he has to approve the match between
you and Randy for him to release the prize money. Who knows, other
players maybe more deserving in his eyes.


For the purse offered, I would presumably arrange travel, but the idea
that one player's conditions will be "final" is absurd. Quite frankly,
I'd much prefer to play GM Evans, who would be a much greater
challenge. As Lance notes, the match is ultimately the decision of
Tyrone and the other sponsors.


So I understand that you will change your conditions whenever you like ?
That`s an ABSURD, Herr Bauer.

My conditions will be final when I publish them. It means that I will not
change them. However I will publish them only when I get to th USA.

Of course in the meantime you can play with Mr.Evans. I will enjoy
crushing you by him very, very much



  #155  
Old May 13th 06, 09:15 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why I'm voting for Sam

Randy Bauer napisal(a):
Yeah, that makes perfect sense. I am to agree to play a match, and I'll
learn the terms when you arrive for the match. Get a grip.


Okey, see you in the USA then

  #156  
Old May 13th 06, 09:22 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why I'm voting for Sam

Nick napisal(a):

Simon ('chapman billy'), who's of Jewish heritage, is a friend of
mine, who regards Jerzy Ciruk as an extremely offensive liar.
Simon has condemned Jerzy Ciruk in rec.games.chess.misc.


Noone can verify the truthfullness of the words by Nick-the-liar
because Simon is another anymouse the same as
Nick-the-anonymous-coward.

Of course the anonymous coward prefers to send someone else to play a
match against me because he does not have balls to play with me in
person but I can see that he is the right person to play the grudge
match with me because of his anonymous hatred he spreads towards me

  #157  
Old May 13th 06, 09:39 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why I'm voting for Sam

Jerzy wrote:
Nick napisal(a):
Simon ('chapman billy'), who's of Jewish heritage, is a friend of
mine, who regards Jerzy Ciruk as an extremely offensive liar.
Simon has condemned Jerzy Ciruk in rec.games.chess.misc.


In the interest of clarity, the last sentence (above) should be:
"Simon has condemned Jerzy Ciruk on account of what
Jerzy Ciruk has written in rec.games.chess.misc."

Noone can verify the truthfullness of the words by Nick-the-liar
because Simon is another anymouse the same as
Nick-the-anonymous-coward.


That's another falsehood by Jerzy Ciruk.

Simon ('chapman billy') has previously revealed his full name
in rec.games.chess.misc. I am certain that at least several
other readers here know Simon's full name, if not also knowing
him personally. Simon has asked me, as his friend, not to
draw attention to his full name, and I respect his preference.

I expect that the more experienced readers here will recall
that Jerzy Ciruk has long been a vehement advocate for
Sam Sloan, who evidently has a general reputation as an
extremely dishonest writer in rec.games.chess.* The
fact that Jerzy Ciruk evidently regards Sam Sloan as
one of the most admirable writers in rec.games.chess.*
reflects Jerzy Ciruk's own extremely base character.

--Nick

  #158  
Old May 14th 06, 02:29 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why I'm voting for Sam

Nick burba napisal(a):

In the interest of clarity, the last sentence (above) should be:
"Simon has condemned Jerzy Ciruk on account of what
Jerzy Ciruk has written in rec.games.chess.misc."


Okay, another mistake by Nick-the-liar who has an obssesion to correct
his numerous mistakes

BTW Simon (chapmann Billy) was a mutation of Nick-the-anonymous-coward
and in fact he neither revealed his true identity nor did write much
here to defend his friend


I expect that the more experienced readers here will recall
that Jerzy Ciruk has long been a vehement advocate for
Sam Sloan, who evidently has a general reputation as an
extremely dishonest writer in rec.games.chess.* The
fact that Jerzy Ciruk evidently regards Sam Sloan as
one of the most admirable writers in rec.games.chess.*
reflects Jerzy Ciruk's own extremely base character.


Of course I vote and have respect for honest and decent people like Sam
Sloan who have the courage to write here under their real names.

Unfortunately that Nick-the-hate-monster is not an honest and decent
person like Sam and other people here.

On the contrary : there are many examples of his obssessive stalking of
decent and honest people here.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
by laws for St Kitts and Nevis Chess Federation marcus@stkittsnevischess.org rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 0 April 12th 06 06:28 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 ChessBanter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Credit Card - Advertising - Mobile Phones - Bargain Flights - Xbox Mod Chip