Uzytkownik "Randy Bauer" napisal w wiadomosci
oups.com...

I claim that Sam is your political opponent and you want to defame him,
Herr
Bauer together with your colleagues like moronic Bill Brock.

I don't need to defame him - the facts do the job just fine.


Of course you want to defame him by accusing him of crimes he did not
commit.

That`s your ill-will, Herr Bauer.

I am willing to extend the same opportunity to discuss the evidence
supporting the Sam Sloan allegations, Jerzy.

If I were to provide links to five separate collections of source
material (total citations not to exceed twenty-five; total links to
photos/illustrations hosted elsewhere not to exceed fifteen), and quote
them verbatim here [redacted for their relevance to my private
obsession ;-) & because life is short], would you agree to provide your
*textual* commentary on each collection in rgcp?

http://philosophons.free.fr/corriges...xplication.htm

No commentary from me in the presentation itself; just primary sources.

SURPRISE! BROCK'S NOT MOTIVATED

Were one motivated, one could subpoena Blogger or
whomever. Most likely, the email address used to create
the blog is itself a cutout. -- Bill Brock

Bill Brock appears to be saying that there is no
way to trace the origin of the third-party attack
containing traces of Randy Bauer's hidden hand.

I imagine that such is true if the party involved
set about to cover his tracks. But Randy Bauer may
have slipped up this time and his cohort on the Finance
Committee lacks the appetitite to investigate further.
..
If there are any among you who have computer expertise,
try to trace the origin of the attack. IF Mr. Bauer is the one,
which may be the case based on his four-letter advocacy
and his relentless smears against Sam Sloan, then we can
close out his USCF political career once and for all.

Since Larry Parr is motivated, he'll forward $1,000 to me for costs.
I'll provide a full accounting of the fees (nothing for myself or
related parties) and refund the difference.

Larry Parr wrote (4 May 2006 18:20:22 -0700):

IF Mr. Bauer is the one, ...

_
"OK, Larry - get out the tired lie
detector issue, because you and
anybody else can raise all the
money you want. I will take a test
anywhere, anytime asking whether
I created that sick content, and
whether I had any advance knowledge
of it. Think Jason would do the same?"
- Randy Bauer (Thu, 04 May 2006
10:49:11 GMT)
_
Does Larry Parr think that this offer settles the
matter? If not, why not?

Upon reflection, wouldn't someone have to have an interest to pursue
this legally? In creating the blog, one has to provide an email
address, inaccessible AFAIK to anyone outside of blogspot.com.

OccamsRazorFreeZone

Who'd be more likely to use the spelling "favours," Randy Bauer or
Jason Repa? Most certainly Bauer, as he could have "pretended" to
slip, but then subsequently frame Repa for having carelessly used the
Canadian spelling.

Equally likely is George John, the only rgcp poster with English as
first language who has used the misspelling "collegue." Again, this is
probably John's clumsy attempt to pin the blog entry upon Repa (bearing
in mind that the French cognate is collègue, and that this English
misspelling is therefore more likely to be made by a Canadian than an
American). Transparent on George's part....

/OccamsRazorFreeZone

Only Parr posing as a politik could believe this ham-handed effort is
anything other than a dirty trick by Jason Repa. It's almost sad to
see Parr either taken in by this chimpanzee masquerading as an ape or
willing to parrot his bull to serve a political purpose.

First, as Bill Brock notes, it is very easy to concoct this sort of
forgery, and Repa has cyber-stalked me and my family before. In fact,
the last time occurred during the last election, when once I showed
Parr the evidence of Repa's bad deeds, he rescinded support for a post
Repa had made against me.

Second, Repa suddenly reappears with a Gmail address and just a couple
days later, this revelation, from a mysterous Frank F -- never posted
here before -- with a Gmail address gives us his sleuthing evidence of
my supposed post of a fake blog of Susan Polgar.

Keep in mind, Susan Polgar is a friend, a person I admire and respect.
It is ludicrous to suggest that I would post a blog that makes her look
bad with the flimsy excuse that it contains a link to Sloan, which
might, to somebody (if they ever saw it), lead them to think badly of
Sloan.

Give me a break - what a house of cards. There is no reason to make
something up about Sloan -- his website alone and his many newsgroup
posts contain stuff more prurient than this blog I supposedly created
and masqueraded as him.

Meanwhile, Parr talks of relentless "smears" of Sam Sloan, which
consist of me noting his felony conviction, prison time, and loss of
both a securities and cab license. Quite a smear; somehow Parr equates
this as similar to the abuse of our boy, Jason Repa. Perhaps Parr --
and anybody else -- should Google Repa on RGCP over the last few years.
If Parr can honestly claim he is a credible source, I'll get out the
polygraph machine.

Randy Bauer

wrote:
SURPRISE! BROCK'S NOT MOTIVATED

Were one motivated, one could subpoena Blogger or
whomever. Most likely, the email address used to create
the blog is itself a cutout. -- Bill Brock

Bill Brock appears to be saying that there is no
way to trace the origin of the third-party attack
containing traces of Randy Bauer's hidden hand.

I imagine that such is true if the party involved
set about to cover his tracks. But Randy Bauer may
have slipped up this time and his cohort on the Finance
Committee lacks the appetitite to investigate further.
.
If there are any among you who have computer expertise,
try to trace the origin of the attack. IF Mr. Bauer is the one,
which may be the case based on his four-letter advocacy
and his relentless smears against Sam Sloan, then we can
close out his USCF political career once and for all.

wrote:
Upon reflection, wouldn't someone have to have an interest to pursue
this legally? In creating the blog, one has to provide an email
address, inaccessible AFAIK to anyone outside of blogspot.com.

OccamsRazorFreeZone

Who'd be more likely to use the spelling "favours," Randy Bauer or
Jason Repa? Most certainly Bauer, as he could have "pretended" to
slip, but then subsequently frame Repa for having carelessly used the
Canadian spelling.

Equally likely is George John, the only rgcp poster with English as
first language who has used the misspelling "collegue." Again, this is
probably John's clumsy attempt to pin the blog entry upon Repa (bearing
in mind that the French cognate is collègue, and that this English
misspelling is therefore more likely to be made by a Canadian than an
American). Transparent on George's part....

/OccamsRazorFreeZone

Very good, Bill - you are a much better sleuther than I. No doubt Parr
will ignore all this, he being linquistically challenged.

Randy Bauer

WHODUNIT?

Since Larry Parr is motivated, he'll forward $1,000
to me for costs. I'll provide a full accounting of the fees
(nothing for myself or related parties) and refund the
difference. -- Bill Brock

Bill Brock can never see the point. He tries.
Gawd knows he tries. But....

Once again THE POINT: Randy Bauer's name was
left hanging in what he claims to be a forgery.
I say that Mr. Bauer would enjoy an overwhelming
presumption of innocence (in addition, to the usual
presumption we accord those accused, including Jason
Repa) if a thorough search of the message source leads
to a dead end. Why? Because if Mr. Bauer is really
behind the third-party assault that tried to implicate
Sam Sloan, he did NOT know how to hide himself as a
source, and a search will lead to him. If it leads to
a deadend, then we may assume with fair certainty that
someone else concocted the assault.

It is not up to me to pay for an investigation
that can clear Mr. Bauer's name. But if someone with
computer expertise who is not a louse or if someone
on the side of the angels knows how to do these things,
a search that leads to a deadend, given Mr. Bauer's
apparent relative computer illiteracy, will leave him
enjoying an overwhelming presumption of innocence.

ANYONE CAN SEE THAT.

On the other hand, if Mr. Bauer ... well, let's find out.

WHODUNIT?

Since Larry Parr is motivated, he'll forward $1,000
to me for costs. I'll provide a full accounting of the fees
(nothing for myself or related parties) and refund the
difference. -- Bill Brock

Bill Brock can never see the point. He tries.
Gawd knows he tries. But....

Once again THE POINT: Randy Bauer's name was
left hanging in what he claims to be a forgery.
I say that Mr. Bauer would enjoy an overwhelming
presumption of innocence (in addition, to the usual
presumption we accord those accused, including Jason
Repa) if a thorough search of the message source leads
to a dead end. Why? Because if Mr. Bauer is really
behind the third-party assault that tried to implicate
Sam Sloan, he did NOT know how to hide himself as a
source, and a search will lead to him. If it leads to
a deadend, then we may assume with fair certainty that
someone else concocted the assault.

It is not up to me to pay for an investigation
that can clear Mr. Bauer's name. But if someone with
computer expertise who is not a louse or if someone
on the side of the angels knows how to do these things,
a search that leads to a deadend, given Mr. Bauer's
apparent relative computer illiteracy, will leave him
enjoying an overwhelming presumption of innocence.

ANYONE CAN SEE THAT.

On the other hand, if Mr. Bauer ... well, let's find out.