Rob, in all seriousness, are you clinically retarded? A fetal-alcohol case?
Perhaps you're just a usenet troll with too much time on your hands. I've
got to rethink whether or not you can handle doing even menial tasks.

Jason






"Rob" wrote in message
oups.com...
Jay,
Not that it is any of my business, but since you made it in a public
post rather than a personal e-mail to the persons involved, may I ask
why you are trying to disparage Randy Bauer and Phil Innes?

I repete the question. Would you please be so kind as to provide one if
there is a valid reason?
Rob

xganon wrote:

(Snipped Innes nonsense)

Cluck Cluck... Cluck

Nice try, Phil. I was wondering when you were going to revive this
screen name.

Brennan can't resist drawing comment to his vile stalkings. Its as if he
wished his persona[s] to be pierced as is often the case with paranoid
schizophrenics.

"The Historian" wrote in message
oups.com...

xganon wrote:

(Snipped Innes nonsense)

I wrote nothing.

Cluck Cluck... Cluck

Nice try, Phil. I was wondering when you were going to revive this
screen name.

Brennan-the-vile is not very sharp, and thinks others similar - he being
personally shaped like a barrage balloon with a Monty Python head on top.

Instead of chess, I have another game in mind for these sorts of people - a
rejoinder not subject to conversation or negotiation.

Phil Innes

Phil Innes wrote (Sun, 28 May 2006 19:17:46 GMT):

Instead of chess, I have another game in mind for these
sorts of people - a rejoinder not subject to conversation
or negotiation.

_
Is Phil Innes posting hints of violence again?

Chess One wrote:
Brennan can't resist drawing comment to his vile stalkings.

On March 25, 2005, Goran Tomic wrote:

"xganon"

IP: 216.196.110.149
Country: United States
City: Cincinnati, Ohio

I wrote:

"...thanks to Goran Tomic, we know that Xganon is posting
through a Cincinnati, OH, address."

Goran Tomic wrote:

"Nothing, if you want to know about spam senders, just call me to
identify
them. I can identify everybody, till his house (if it's necessary)."

Phil Innes wrote:

"Thanks Goran, thanks, but it is not necessary."

And I wrote then, and repeat now:

Of course not. Far better for you to libel others rather than attempt
to discover who Xganon is.

Louis Blair wrote:
Phil Innes wrote (Sun, 28 May 2006 19:17:46 GMT):

Instead of chess, I have another game in mind for these
sorts of people - a rejoinder not subject to conversation
or negotiation.

_
Is Phil Innes posting hints of violence again?

Yes. I'll let Philth's own words speak instead:

"The FBI will possibly in touch with you Brennen; for your own
expressions
seem to inexplicably engender abuse of others (not only myself). But
for
myself, I simply offer you the reflection that their are sharper
things than
wit.

"And if you **** with me and mine I will certainly make entirely sure
you
understand me without a shadow of a doubt. I am possibly over my
petit-fascist tolerancing line.

"Is this sufficiently clear?"

And:

"I am prepared to visit you to discuss our differences - what do you
say to
that? You can be up front about it here or simply wait until I show
up. If
you are at all alarmed at the potential threat of this message I
suggest you
contact the FBI."

And:

"Brennen- you fail to understand - you have booked yourself a date!

"You are the mother****er who has continously excited these events,
based on
ad hominem attack, and who now cannot even remember their consequence,
preferring, as you do, the words of the rascist (and ******) abuser,
as
apparently did St. Niro.

"Hang on for a month or two if you can, and eventually I'll make it
down and
visit you where you are and we'll get things entirely clear between
us.

"This is not, as you realise, the proverbial threat, but an absolutely
solid
promise of response to continuous provocation against myself and my
family.

"If you want to accelerate the encounter, come."

And here's Philth with his potty mouth on:

"I must remind any reader here that the person who writes this
describes
himself as an 'historian', but one who has apparently read ****-all."

"But still you **** with the subject, lol!!"

"Louis, this is boring beyond tears. I have wondered why you agitate on
the
unbidden behest of others, without the slightest attempt to even
identify
what the **** you are now objecting to"

"You are the mother****er who has continously excited these events,"

"And if you **** with me and mine I will certainly make entirely sure
you
understand me without a shadow of a doubt."

"Will your sub-personality xganon-**** show up..."

"**** your condolences."

"if you cant write your own name to your posts why dont you **** off?"

"...**** that for a game of charlies!"

"Mala fides, malignum spernere vulgus!
(Bad faith and **** the people)"

"Neither of these people seem to me to be hyphenable-**** to me."

"If you want to **** with me lets sort it out. Come on... Lets do it.
Where
do you both live?"

"So interest from Americans has to go around, even avoid USCF [because
they
will **** it up],"

"'****' Sam, why be coy when talking of freudian sluts"

"**** him! "

Is Neil Brennen gratuitously raising the subject of disgusting messages
about my family? What a vile piece of work he is! How strange that stalker
Brennen's posts are followed by this xganon person's messages. How utterly
pathetic!


Phil Innes

"The Historian" wrote in message
ups.com...

Chess One wrote:
Brennan can't resist drawing comment to his vile stalkings.

On March 25, 2005, Goran Tomic wrote:

"xganon"

IP: 216.196.110.149
Country: United States
City: Cincinnati, Ohio

I wrote:

"...thanks to Goran Tomic, we know that Xganon is posting
through a Cincinnati, OH, address."

Goran Tomic wrote:

"Nothing, if you want to know about spam senders, just call me to
identify
them. I can identify everybody, till his house (if it's necessary)."

Phil Innes wrote:

"Thanks Goran, thanks, but it is not necessary."

And I wrote then, and repeat now:

Of course not. Far better for you to libel others rather than attempt
to discover who Xganon is.

Chess One wrote:
Is Neil Brennen gratuitously raising the subject of disgusting messages
about my family?

No, I am raising the subject of your lack of interest in discovering
the identity of the poster.

On March 25, 2005, Goran Tomic wrote:

"xganon"

IP: 216.196.110.149
Country: United States
City: Cincinnati, Ohio

I wrote:

"...thanks to Goran Tomic, we know that Xganon is posting
through a Cincinnati, OH, address."

Goran Tomic wrote:

"Nothing, if you want to know about spam senders, just call me to
identify
them. I can identify everybody, till his house (if it's necessary)."

Phil Innes wrote:

"Thanks Goran, thanks, but it is not necessary."

And I wrote then, and repeat now:

Of course not. Far better for you to libel others rather than attempt
to discover who Xganon is.