What a disgusting and unfortunate thing to say on a public forum. I wish you
had something of substance to contribute.

"Jason (the grim) Repa" wrote in message
news:Qe66g.113239$P01.68153@pd7tw3no...

"Randy Bauer" wrote in message
news:sx06g.132522$oL.16596@attbi_s71...

"John J." wrote in message
. ..
Very strange. I guess he thinks he's The Catcher in the Rye.

"Very strange" sums it up nicely. This is far from the only "very
strange" post you can find with Sam discussing in tasteless detail his
sexual escapades.

What about your whore wife Debbie's sexual escapades? I hear she took on
three NBA players at once!

"John J." wrote in message
...
What a disgusting and unfortunate thing to say on a public forum. I wish
you had something of substance to contribute.

I agree.

Its taunting people in a cowardly way - I rather doubt that any of these
taunts would be uttered face to face, since as men we'd knock the living
**** out of anyone who insulted our families or ourselves.

The difference in this taunt is that its cruder and more obvious than
others.

Phil Innes


"Jason (the grim) Repa" wrote in message
news:Qe66g.113239$P01.68153@pd7tw3no...

"Randy Bauer" wrote in message
news:sx06g.132522$oL.16596@attbi_s71...

"John J." wrote in message
. ..
Very strange. I guess he thinks he's The Catcher in the Rye.

"Very strange" sums it up nicely. This is far from the only "very
strange" post you can find with Sam discussing in tasteless detail his
sexual escapades.

What about your whore wife Debbie's sexual escapades? I hear she took on
three NBA players at once!

Heck, Phil. Down here they just shoot first and ask questions later. Seems
everyone in Florida carries a piece these days.

"Chess One" wrote in message
news:HG66g.3626$Fp5.2224@trndny09...

"John J." wrote in message
...
What a disgusting and unfortunate thing to say on a public forum. I wish
you had something of substance to contribute.

I agree.

Its taunting people in a cowardly way - I rather doubt that any of these
taunts would be uttered face to face, since as men we'd knock the living
**** out of anyone who insulted our families or ourselves.

The difference in this taunt is that its cruder and more obvious than
others.

Phil Innes


"Jason (the grim) Repa" wrote in message
news:Qe66g.113239$P01.68153@pd7tw3no...

"Randy Bauer" wrote in message
news:sx06g.132522$oL.16596@attbi_s71...

"John J." wrote in message
. ..
Very strange. I guess he thinks he's The Catcher in the Rye.

"Very strange" sums it up nicely. This is far from the only "very
strange" post you can find with Sam discussing in tasteless detail his
sexual escapades.

What about your whore wife Debbie's sexual escapades? I hear she took on
three NBA players at once!

since as men we'd knock the living **** out of anyone who insulted
our families [?--WHB] or ourselves.

See you at the Chicago Open!

I'm 5'3", 135 lbs. Bauer is about the same size.

"John J." wrote in message
.. .
Heck, Phil. Down here they just shoot first and ask questions later. Seems
everyone in Florida carries a piece these days.

Its not legal here in new england - not even with lawyers! I used to carry a
nato assault rifle, and its no fun! You have a much better chance of getting
dead with one than without. Phil

"Chess One" wrote in message
news:HG66g.3626$Fp5.2224@trndny09...

"John J." wrote in message
...
What a disgusting and unfortunate thing to say on a public forum. I wish
you had something of substance to contribute.

I agree.

Its taunting people in a cowardly way - I rather doubt that any of these
taunts would be uttered face to face, since as men we'd knock the living
**** out of anyone who insulted our families or ourselves.

The difference in this taunt is that its cruder and more obvious than
others.

Phil Innes


"Jason (the grim) Repa" wrote in message
news:Qe66g.113239$P01.68153@pd7tw3no...

"Randy Bauer" wrote in message
news:sx06g.132522$oL.16596@attbi_s71...

"John J." wrote in message
. ..
Very strange. I guess he thinks he's The Catcher in the Rye.

"Very strange" sums it up nicely. This is far from the only "very
strange" post you can find with Sam discussing in tasteless detail his
sexual escapades.

What about your whore wife Debbie's sexual escapades? I hear she took
on three NBA players at once!

Chess One wrote:
"The Historian" wrote in message
oups.com...

wrote:

Sam took a securities case to the U.S. Supreme
Court and WON by 9-0. He is the last non-attorney to
argue successfully before the Court. He would have
had to prevail in a second case to recover his
license, which he had neither the money nor energy to
do.

Larry is 'under-researched', as Philth Innes might say. The Supreme
Court case was in 1978, AFTER Sloan lost his license.

Some people think you go to court to seek redress for things which have
already happened!

Some people think you can go to court whenever, for whatever you feel
like going to court for. Shame the courts don't agree with them.

On the other hand, some people don't think at all!

Your narcissism is showing again.

Snip Innes talking about himself again.


The bureaucrats lost in the courts but they won
out against the individual.

Again, Sloan's 'victory' was only on a procedural matter. The Supreme
Court ruled the SEC could not reissue a ten-day suspension order "based
upon a single set of circumstances." Implying Sloan could ever have
resumed trading shows an ignorance, wilfull or otherwise, of the facts.

http://www.samsloan.com/sec.htm

http://www.samsloan.com/369fs996.htm

Conclusions of Law

1. This Court has jurisdiction under Section 27 of the Exchange Act, 15
U.S.C. ?? 78aa.

2. From on or about January 15, 1971 through January 31, 1972, [**13]
as well as from May 1973 to date, Sloan & Co., under the direction of
Sloan wilfully violated Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C.
?? 78q(a), and Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4 promulgated thereunder, in
that Sloan & Co. failed to properly maintain, keep current and preserve
certain of its books and records, including: Ledgers or other records
reflecting all assets and liabilities, income and expense and capital
accounts; A securities record or ledger; A firm trading account;
Ledgers (or other records) reflecting securities failed to receive and
failed to deliver; Trial balances (or other records of all ledger
accounts); and Computations of aggregate indebtedness and net capital.

3. From on or about January 18, 1971 as well as May and August 1973,
Sloan & Co., under the direction of Sloan wilfully violated Section
15(c)(3) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. ?? 78o(c)(3), and Rule
15c3-1 promulgated thereunder, in that Sloan & Co. effected
transactions in securities (other than exempted securities or
commercial paper, bankers' acceptances or commercial bills) otherwise
than on a national securities exchange while and at a time when its
aggregate indebtedness to all other persons exceeded [**14] 2,000 per
centum of its net capital and, in addition, its net capital was less
than $5,000 or $15,000 as required.

4. While engaged in the above described acts, practices and course of
business, defendants, directly and indirectly, made use of the mails
and means and instruments of transportation and communication in
interstate commerce, and of the means and instrumentalities of
interstate commerce, and effected the transactions otherwise than on a
national securities exchange.

5. The issuance of a permanent injunction is necessary to protect the
public against the continuation or repetition of the above described
violations [*1002] and, unless permanently enjoined, there is a
likelihood that the defendants will continue to engage in violations of
the Exchange Act and the Rules promulgated thereunder.

[Bauer and Brock] have not a word to say about chess

1 As for Brock: well, no, not here.

1.1 This is rgckf.

1.11 'Nuff said!

1.2 Separately, chess is hard.

1.21 "What we cannot speak of we must pass over in silence..."

1.211 "...unless our surname is Parr."

1.2111 Truthiness at http://tinyurl.com/pzvuw

1.21111 And also at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen...ciation_Dinner

1.211111 ...but I digress

1.2112 Reality-based commentary at
http://www.gadycosteff.com/eg/eg73.pdf

1.21121 Don't miss the amazing Diagram S15: has this been
computer-checked?

1.2113 Funny thing: the Szen position and related endings have been
explained rather clearly *several times* in Chess Life over the years:
I've seen it & related positions in "Evans on Chess" more than once.

1.21131 One would think that even a casual reader would remember.

1.211311 I recommend that Parr read Evans's writings on the play of the
game of chess.

1.212 Squabbling book reviewers and authors are encouraged not to
substitute names.

1.2121 Molesting a child is worse that writing a bad chess book.

1.2122 Molesting a child is somewhat worse than writing a bad chess
review.

"John J." wrote in message
...
What a disgusting and unfortunate thing to say on a public forum. I wish
you had something of substance to contribute.

I concur. Debbie is such a filthy whoring pig, I can barely keep myself from
vomiting.

Chess One wrote:
"John J." wrote in message
...
What a disgusting and unfortunate thing to say on a public forum. I wish
you had something of substance to contribute.

I agree.

Its taunting people in a cowardly way - I rather doubt that any of these
taunts would be uttered face to face, since as men we'd knock the living
**** out of anyone who insulted our families or ourselves.

The difference in this taunt is that its cruder and more obvious than
others.

Phil Innes

I appreciate your post. Jason is a sick soul who has gone so far as to
take a picture of my wife and me once posted on Matt Nemmer's site with
pictures of RGCP posters, crop me out of the picture, then post it on
dating sites.

He is obviously mentally ill. I am not concerned about him in the
physical sense -- I've had others send me pics from Canadian
tournaments, and he is a slouching Pillsbury doughboy type. I suspect
he lives at home, and when working, he and asks if people want fries
with their burger.

Given the choice of saving Sam or Jason from a burning building, Sam
will be my choice.

Randy Bauer


"Jason (the grim) Repa" wrote in message
news:Qe66g.113239$P01.68153@pd7tw3no...

"Randy Bauer" wrote in message
news:sx06g.132522$oL.16596@attbi_s71...

"John J." wrote in message
. ..
Very strange. I guess he thinks he's The Catcher in the Rye.

"Very strange" sums it up nicely. This is far from the only "very
strange" post you can find with Sam discussing in tasteless detail his
sexual escapades.

What about your whore wife Debbie's sexual escapades? I hear she took on
three NBA players at once!

wrote:
HEY, RANDY, DID YOU MISS THIS POST?


From: Peter F. - view profile
Date: Wed, May 3 2006 12:15 pm
Email: "Peter F."
Groups: rec.games.chess.misc, rec.games.chess.politics

I found this pretty interesting. In a thread about Susan Polgar a week
ago or so, someone posted the link: http://chesswhore.blogspot.com/
This was clearly a prank, and additionally, it looks as though whoever
conducted this prank, tried to make it look as though Sam Sloan was
responsible as you can see for yourself that Sam Sloan's chess page is
one of the links there. However, and this is the interesting part, if
you view the original html code, ie; "view", "source" (in internet
explorer), you will see who actually put this blog together. Near the
bottom of the source code page, you will come across this line of code:
"!-- emposted by Randy Bauer @ a
href="http://chesswhore.blogspot.com/2006/04/i-am-whore.html"
title="permanent link"4:40 PM/a/em   -- "


that has been commented out with the !-- &-- tags so that it
doesn't appear on the actual webpage. I guess he didn't know that it
would still appear in the html code.

I'm sure somebody can do some deeper research to find out who is
responsible. I've learned there are lots of people with knowlege of
computers and programming far deeper than mine.

Needless to say, I see no need to make up fake Sloan posts -- the real
ones are good enough for me. I did not post the material in question.
Gee, you think somebody could have conveniently put that information
there to take the heat off the FACTS about Sloan I have posted?

I genuinely like and respect Susan Polgar. I wouldn't post anything
negative about her, even if I was supposedly attributing it to others.
She is a class act and deserves better.

If I were a betting man, this sounds like the work of Jason Repa, who
has a history of similar types of forgeries.

Randy Bauer